Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #29095
| Path | csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!weretis.net!feeder4.news.weretis.net!feeds.phibee-telecom.net!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed6.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| Return-Path | <dwightdhutto@gmail.com> |
| X-Original-To | python-list@python.org |
| Delivered-To | python-list@mail.python.org |
| X-Spam-Status | OK 0.002 |
| X-Spam-Evidence | '*H*': 1.00; '*S*': 0.00; 'context': 0.05; 'completeness': 0.07; 'present,': 0.07; 'referring': 0.07; 'responding': 0.07; 'seemed': 0.07; 'python': 0.09; 'docs.': 0.09; 'lawrence': 0.09; 'lookup': 0.09; 'lost.': 0.09; 'received:mail- vc0-f174.google.com': 0.09; 'referenced': 0.09; 'respond.': 0.09; 'sep': 0.09; 'through.': 0.09; 'cc:addr:python-list': 0.10; 'contribute': 0.10; 'archive': 0.11; 'thread': 0.11; 'useful,': 0.13; 'compatible,': 0.16; 'disclaimers': 0.16; 'disclaimers,': 0.16; 'securities,': 0.16; 'summarize,': 0.16; 'url:disclosures': 0.16; 'url:jpmorgan': 0.16; 'wed,': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.17; 'thu,': 0.17; 'windows': 0.19; 'putting': 0.20; 'question.': 0.20; 'do.': 0.21; 'context.': 0.22; 'help.': 0.22; "i'd": 0.22; 'cc:2**0': 0.23; 'mention': 0.23; 'posts': 0.23; 'references': 0.23; 'to:2**1': 0.23; 'seems': 0.23; 'cc:addr:python.org': 0.25; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.25; 'developers': 0.26; 'leave': 0.26; 'am,': 0.27; 'guess': 0.27; 'topic': 0.27; 'accuracy': 0.27; 'see,': 0.27; 'message-id:@mail.gmail.com': 0.27; 'there.': 0.28; 'noticed': 0.28; 'about.': 0.29; 'argue': 0.29; 'context,': 0.29; 'finds': 0.29; 'helpful.': 0.29; 'informative': 0.29; 'received:209.85.220.174': 0.29; 'url:mailman': 0.29; 'probably': 0.29; 'this.': 0.29; "i'm": 0.29; 'related': 0.30; 'usually': 0.30; 'figure': 0.30; 'on,': 0.30; 'point': 0.31; 'asking': 0.32; 'url:python': 0.32; 'google,': 0.32; 'could': 0.32; 'url:listinfo': 0.32; 'goes': 0.33; 'everyone.': 0.33; 'everyone': 0.33; 'themselves': 0.33; 'another': 0.33; 'agree': 0.34; 'received:google.com': 0.34; 'text': 0.34; 'list': 0.35; 'feed': 0.35; 'problem,': 0.35; 'especially': 0.35; 'pm,': 0.35; 'received:209.85.220': 0.35; 'sometimes': 0.35; 'subject:?': 0.35; 'received:209.85': 0.35; 'something': 0.35; 'there': 0.35; 'but': 0.36; 'url:org': 0.36; '12,': 0.36; "wasn't": 0.36; 'useful': 0.36; "i'll": 0.36; 'problems': 0.36; 'possible': 0.37; 'does': 0.37; 'resources': 0.37; 'being': 0.37; 'why': 0.37; 'previous': 0.37; 'received:209': 0.37; 'far': 0.37; 'subject:: ': 0.38; 'mark': 0.38; 'some': 0.38; 'things': 0.38; 'delete': 0.38; 'instead': 0.39; 'list,': 0.39; 'little': 0.39; 'where': 0.40; 'most': 0.61; 'real': 0.61; 'back': 0.62; 'time,': 0.62; 'referred': 0.62; 'information,': 0.63; 'url:email': 0.63; 'more': 0.63; 'show': 0.63; 'legal': 0.65; 'subject': 0.66; 'e-mail,': 0.66; 'talking': 0.66; 'response.': 0.67; 'purchase': 0.67; 'believe': 0.69; 'overcome': 0.71; 'attention': 0.75; 'saw': 0.75; 'sale': 0.76; 'absolutely': 0.84; 'about,': 0.84; 'anywhere.': 0.84; 'everything.': 0.84; 'offline,': 0.84; 'researching': 0.84; 'taken.': 0.84; 'conversation': 0.91; 'transactions': 0.91; 'response,': 0.93 |
| DKIM-Signature | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=7pGHMeEpQh1vEsAKMbG8PVcQCDOi7Dzj3s/TvXetVeA=; b=CUUQ6uHxRmXeNzBWhtdj9z3IQKkZ4pJYcYUt9Z2VmdWbiG6bJmldhQOVcR0bLTdlJI qV1JNQcgzChFVEqnKPu7SGyMlMcs8GlFm6jA0EMOHmFjbuGTUW/qG3Qy+Yeo3hZeXWyP dZLtWHlcYV5Zlj7mKer5COOWi9msWU1z3NUhg2g1mqm2YAyfymOfaHlaik+LRo+1hU2v ZwxNbm4u6OfIlyES4Sr9g2CeaQBXNLx4qH04sp6AzxZcgcc1VzuAkQTyH6lUDjpec7xv 3JItil6YhSopyhisZ76shJIJ100DcwEs1yNETviF8bPFhDceCBixrUeAyVTllPHLH/eG Da8g== |
| MIME-Version | 1.0 |
| In-Reply-To | <5B80DD153D7D744689F57F4FB69AF47416678FC5@SCACMX008.exchad.jpmchase.net> |
| References | <af4c9164-238f-4a94-8ed1-7c767f8c51bf@googlegroups.com> <k2para$298$1@ger.gmane.org> <CA+vVgJVgPVMNWYEQjVhj0zGko9ztjeaXdSQ-J19Xaqsn0-vCUg@mail.gmail.com> <k2pe2q$rul$1@ger.gmane.org> <CA+vVgJWesP_O1SgSt7qCAV-NshQH7-omQH+oiLFYw9nXtx+q0w@mail.gmail.com> <5B80DD153D7D744689F57F4FB69AF47416678FC5@SCACMX008.exchad.jpmchase.net> |
| Date | Thu, 13 Sep 2012 21:11:58 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: pythonOCC examples doesn't work? |
| From | Dwight Hutto <dwightdhutto@gmail.com> |
| To | "Prasad, Ramit" <ramit.prasad@jpmorgan.com> |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 |
| Cc | "python-list@python.org" <python-list@python.org> |
| X-BeenThere | python-list@python.org |
| X-Mailman-Version | 2.1.15 |
| Precedence | list |
| List-Id | General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org> |
| List-Unsubscribe | <http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe> |
| List-Archive | <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/> |
| List-Post | <mailto:python-list@python.org> |
| List-Help | <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help> |
| List-Subscribe | <http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.655.1347585120.27098.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
| Lines | 110 |
| NNTP-Posting-Host | 2001:888:2000:d::a6 |
| X-Trace | 1347585120 news.xs4all.nl 6920 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:44583 |
| X-Complaints-To | abuse@xs4all.nl |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.lang.python:29095 |
Show key headers only | View raw
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 7:26 PM, Prasad, Ramit <ramit.prasad@jpmorgan.com> wrote: > Dwight Hutto wrote: > > [snip] > >> On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 3:37 AM, Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> >> wrote: > > [snip] > >> Others would be able to see this for themselves but >> > you insist on sending email without context. Please don't do this. >> >> How are my emails without context? I'm referring the OP to the docs, >> as well as posts related to their question. It goes to use google, and >> RTFM, and putting it politely to them. >> > > > I have noticed that you do not always quote what you are talking about. > Sometimes I can guess or look at another message and see what you > are talking about, but not always. This list philosophy seems to be > "quote what is relevant and trim what is not". Not on a > "go lookup the previous message to find context". > >> I could summarize, but they have to do the real reading. I'm not >> researching this, and if I was, I'd charge for the time. This is to >> show that things can get complex if you don't use google, or read the >> docs. > > > Context is not the same as explaining absolutely everything. > It means that I, the reader, can see *what* you are talking about > and what you are responding *to*. > > I do agree with the stance not to spoon feed OP(s). > >> >> Why does the OP keep asking here, when there are answers out there. >> especiThey would still need to process transactions like cash while offline, and they would also need access to their inventory.ally on the pywin list, which Windows users are usually referred >> to. > > I was not aware that Windows users were "usually" referred anywhere. > Most referrals are on a case-by-case basis as many problems or > questions from Windows Python developers are Python questions and > not specific to pywin. > >> >> Please point out what's out of context. The links and references place >> it into context if the OP finds them useful, and I believe I searched >> well for them. >> >> Would the OP like to tell me I wasn't helpful? Because now they're >> probably on a search to figure out how to make these compatible, which >> means more questions, and more reading. > > Nobody is claiming you are not helpful. I appreciate your effort, > I just do not always know what is going on in a thread especially > if I see the thread jump to something I can contribute to but now have > no context with which to help. Not to mention that the archive for > this list is searchable. Your answer is much more useful for future > searchers if you leave some context for someone reading this. > > [snip] > >> >> Let's not argue about this, I was pointing them to what I saw as the >> best possible resources to overcome his current problem, and it was >> all in context of the conversation as far as I'm concerned. >> > > It is in context of the "thread", but the context of the > "conversation" was lost. > > > This email is confidential and subject to important disclaimers and > conditions including on offers for the purchase or sale of > securities, accuracy and completeness of information, viruses, > confidentiality, legal privilege, and legal entity disclaimers, > available at http://www.jpmorgan.com/pages/disclosures/email. > -- > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list Your point is taken. Most of the time, if it's in an in line response I would write the email line by line, with the referenced text shown above my response. However, when it seems like a conversation, I just trim the above, and respond. That's how I view an e-mail, like an ongoing conversation. >From now on, I'll leave the mailing I'm responding to above, and delete the point's I'm not talking about, which is about what I usually do. So being attacked about no context(which was an attack out of context, based on a few messages one night), when the whole conversation is in the topic reader/gmail/etc seemed a little ignorant to reading through. All he had to do was look back up to the email s just above my response, and see, or read just through mine, not read everyone. But anyway, I'll be more informative as to exactly what I was referencing, instead of treating it like an ongoing conversation where everyone was present, and paying attention to the whole of the topic. -- Best Regards, David Hutto CEO: http://www.hitwebdevelopment.com
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
pythonOCC examples doesn't work? Jayden <jayden.shui@gmail.com> - 2012-09-11 21:02 -0700
Re: pythonOCC examples doesn't work? Marco Nawijn <nawijn@gmail.com> - 2012-09-11 21:42 -0700
Re: pythonOCC examples doesn't work? Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-09-12 07:41 +0100
Re: pythonOCC examples doesn't work? Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-09-12 08:37 +0100
Re: pythonOCC examples doesn't work? Dwight Hutto <dwightdhutto@gmail.com> - 2012-09-12 04:12 -0400
Re: pythonOCC examples doesn't work? jelle <jelleferinga@gmail.com> - 2012-09-12 08:12 -0700
Re: pythonOCC examples doesn't work? Jayden <jayden.shui@gmail.com> - 2012-09-12 10:03 -0700
Re: pythonOCC examples doesn't work? Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2012-09-12 16:58 -0400
RE: pythonOCC examples doesn't work? "Prasad, Ramit" <ramit.prasad@jpmorgan.com> - 2012-09-13 23:26 +0000
Re: pythonOCC examples doesn't work? Dwight Hutto <dwightdhutto@gmail.com> - 2012-09-13 21:11 -0400
Re: pythonOCC examples doesn't work? Dwight Hutto <dwightdhutto@gmail.com> - 2012-09-13 21:14 -0400
Re: pythonOCC examples doesn't work? Dennis Lee Bieber <wlfraed@ix.netcom.com> - 2012-09-13 22:55 -0400
Re: pythonOCC examples doesn't work? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2012-09-14 17:30 +1000
Re: pythonOCC examples doesn't work? Dwight Hutto <dwightdhutto@gmail.com> - 2012-09-14 03:49 -0400
Re: pythonOCC examples doesn't work? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2012-09-14 18:15 +1000
RE: pythonOCC examples doesn't work? "Prasad, Ramit" <ramit.prasad@jpmorgan.com> - 2012-09-14 22:51 +0000
Re: pythonOCC examples doesn't work? Dwight Hutto <dwightdhutto@gmail.com> - 2012-09-14 23:47 -0400
Re: pythonOCC examples doesn't work? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2012-09-15 13:53 +1000
Re: pythonOCC examples doesn't work? Dwight Hutto <dwightdhutto@gmail.com> - 2012-09-15 00:40 -0400
Re: pythonOCC examples doesn't work? MRAB <python@mrabarnett.plus.com> - 2012-09-15 18:26 +0100
Re: pythonOCC examples doesn't work? Dwight Hutto <dwightdhutto@gmail.com> - 2012-09-17 02:44 -0400
BDFL Rossenbom, was Re: pythonOCC examples doesn't work? Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> - 2012-09-17 09:24 +0200
csiph-web