Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.python > #20240

Re: Python usage numbers

Path csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!weretis.net!feeder1.news.weretis.net!feeder.erje.net!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed5.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail
Return-Path <python-python-list@m.gmane.org>
X-Original-To python-list@python.org
Delivered-To python-list@mail.python.org
X-Spam-Status OK 0.007
X-Spam-Evidence '*H*': 0.99; '*S*': 0.00; 'frameworks': 0.04; 'instance,': 0.05; 'subject:Python': 0.05; 'resource.': 0.07; 'python': 0.08; 'of)': 0.09; 'received:80.91': 0.09; 'received:80.91.229': 0.09; 'received:gmane.org': 0.09; 'received:list': 0.09; 'scripts,': 0.09; 'totals': 0.09; 'thanks!': 0.14; 'matplotlib': 0.16; 'newsgroups': 0.16; 'partly': 0.16; 'sign.': 0.16; 'subject:usage': 0.16; 'whole,': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; 'level,': 0.18; '(which': 0.19; 'thus': 0.21; "aren't": 0.21; 'discussion': 0.22; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.22; '(or': 0.22; 'subject:numbers': 0.23; 'django': 0.25; '(like': 0.26; 'stuff': 0.26; "i'm": 0.28; 'compile': 0.29; 'unicode': 0.29; 'problem': 0.29; 'print': 0.29; 'generally': 0.30; "ain't": 0.30; 'actually': 0.31; "i've": 0.32; 'anyone': 0.32; 'does': 0.32; "isn't": 0.33; 'there': 0.33; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.33; 'header:X-Complaints-To:1': 0.34; 'done.': 0.34; 'eric': 0.34; 'framework': 0.34; 'from:addr:yahoo.co.uk': 0.34; 'vs.': 0.34; 'problem.': 0.35; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.35; 'received:org': 0.36; 'but': 0.37; 'stable': 0.38; 'could': 0.38; 'some': 0.38; 'useful': 0.38; 'should': 0.38; 'easier': 0.38; 'etc.)': 0.39; 'that.': 0.39; 'entirely': 0.40; 'change': 0.40; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.40; 'easy': 0.60; 'more': 0.61; 'helping': 0.62; 'projects': 0.63; 'categories': 0.64; 'ever': 0.64; 'making': 0.64; 'valuable': 0.65; 'show': 0.66; 'affected.': 0.67; 'wish': 0.68; 'received:89': 0.69; 'regional': 0.73; 'targeted': 0.76; '"big': 0.84; 'received:as13285.net': 0.84; 'discovering': 0.91; 'snow': 0.91; 'exposing': 0.93
X-Injected-Via-Gmane http://gmane.org/
To python-list@python.org
From Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk>
Subject Re: Python usage numbers
Date Sat, 11 Feb 2012 22:17:20 +0000
References <CALFfu7BwqDR+4RN9VNFi35J6HJa2x=rFFTKuGAX_K=J_eRb1xg@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding 8bit
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host host-89-243-192-216.as13285.net
User-Agent Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.0; rv:10.0) Gecko/20120129 Thunderbird/10.0
In-Reply-To <CALFfu7BwqDR+4RN9VNFi35J6HJa2x=rFFTKuGAX_K=J_eRb1xg@mail.gmail.com>
X-Antivirus avast! (VPS 120211-1, 11/02/2012), Outbound message
X-Antivirus-Status Clean
X-BeenThere python-list@python.org
X-Mailman-Version 2.1.12
Precedence list
List-Id General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org>
List-Unsubscribe <http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list>
List-Post <mailto:python-list@python.org>
List-Help <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe <http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe>
Newsgroups comp.lang.python
Message-ID <mailman.5709.1328998635.27778.python-list@python.org> (permalink)
Lines 47
NNTP-Posting-Host 2001:888:2000:d::a6
X-Trace 1328998635 news.xs4all.nl 6876 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:34302
X-Complaints-To abuse@xs4all.nl
Xref x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.python:20240

Show key headers only | View raw


On 11/02/2012 21:02, Eric Snow wrote:
> Does anyone have (or know of) accurate totals and percentages on how
> Python is used?  I'm particularly interested in the following
> groupings:
>
> - new development vs. stable code-bases
> - categories (web, scripts, "big data", computation, etc.)
> - "bare metal" vs. on top of some framework
> - regional usage
>
> I'm thinking about this partly because of the discussion on
> python-ideas about the perceived challenges of Unicode in Python 3.
> All the rhetoric, anecdotal evidence, and use-cases there have little
> meaning to me, in regards to Python as a whole, without an
> understanding of who is actually affected.
>
> For instance, if frameworks (like django and numpy) could completely
> hide the arguable challenges of Unicode in Python 3--and most projects
> were built on top of frameworks--then general efforts for making
> Unicode easier in Python 3 should go toward helping framework writers.
>
> Not only are such usage numbers useful for the Unicode discussion
> (which I wish would get resolved and die so we could move on to more
> interesting stuff :) ).  They help us know where efforts could be
> focused in general to make Python more powerful and easier to use
> where it's already used extensively.  They can show us the areas that
> Python isn't used much, thus exposing a targeted opportunity to change
> that.
>
> Realistically, it's not entirely feasible to compile such information
> at a comprehensive level, but even generally accurate numbers would be
> a valuable resource.  If the numbers aren't out there, what would some
> good approaches to discovering them?  Thanks!
>
> -eric

As others have said on other Python newsgroups it ain't a problem.  The 
only time I've ever had a problem was with matplotlib which couldn't 
print a £ sign.  I used a U to enforce unicode job done.  If I had a 
major problem I reckon that a search on c.l.p would give me an answer 
easy peasy.

-- 
Cheers.

Mark Lawrence.

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: Python usage numbers Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-02-11 22:17 +0000

csiph-web