Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #20239
| Date | 2012-02-11 15:51 -0600 |
|---|---|
| From | Andrew Berg <bahamutzero8825@gmail.com> |
| Subject | Re: Python usage numbers |
| References | <CALFfu7BwqDR+4RN9VNFi35J6HJa2x=rFFTKuGAX_K=J_eRb1xg@mail.gmail.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.5708.1328997127.27778.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
On 2/11/2012 3:02 PM, Eric Snow wrote: > I'm thinking about this partly because of the discussion on > python-ideas about the perceived challenges of Unicode in Python 3. > For instance, if frameworks (like django and numpy) could completely > hide the arguable challenges of Unicode in Python 3--and most projects > were built on top of frameworks--then general efforts for making > Unicode easier in Python 3 should go toward helping framework writers. Huh? I'll admit I'm a novice, but isn't Unicode mostly trivial in py3k compared to 2.x? Or are you referring to porting 2.x to 3.x? I've been under the impression that Unicode in 2.x can be painful at times, but easy in 3.x. I've been using 3.2 and Unicode hasn't been much of an issue. -- CPython 3.2.2 | Windows NT 6.1.7601.17640
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Python usage numbers Andrew Berg <bahamutzero8825@gmail.com> - 2012-02-11 15:51 -0600
csiph-web