Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #20240 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2012-02-11 22:17 +0000 |
| Last post | 2012-02-11 22:17 +0000 |
| Articles | 1 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.python
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: Python usage numbers Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-02-11 22:17 +0000
| From | Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-02-11 22:17 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Python usage numbers |
| Message-ID | <mailman.5709.1328998635.27778.python-list@python.org> |
On 11/02/2012 21:02, Eric Snow wrote: > Does anyone have (or know of) accurate totals and percentages on how > Python is used? I'm particularly interested in the following > groupings: > > - new development vs. stable code-bases > - categories (web, scripts, "big data", computation, etc.) > - "bare metal" vs. on top of some framework > - regional usage > > I'm thinking about this partly because of the discussion on > python-ideas about the perceived challenges of Unicode in Python 3. > All the rhetoric, anecdotal evidence, and use-cases there have little > meaning to me, in regards to Python as a whole, without an > understanding of who is actually affected. > > For instance, if frameworks (like django and numpy) could completely > hide the arguable challenges of Unicode in Python 3--and most projects > were built on top of frameworks--then general efforts for making > Unicode easier in Python 3 should go toward helping framework writers. > > Not only are such usage numbers useful for the Unicode discussion > (which I wish would get resolved and die so we could move on to more > interesting stuff :) ). They help us know where efforts could be > focused in general to make Python more powerful and easier to use > where it's already used extensively. They can show us the areas that > Python isn't used much, thus exposing a targeted opportunity to change > that. > > Realistically, it's not entirely feasible to compile such information > at a comprehensive level, but even generally accurate numbers would be > a valuable resource. If the numbers aren't out there, what would some > good approaches to discovering them? Thanks! > > -eric As others have said on other Python newsgroups it ain't a problem. The only time I've ever had a problem was with matplotlib which couldn't print a £ sign. I used a U to enforce unicode job done. If I had a major problem I reckon that a search on c.l.p would give me an answer easy peasy. -- Cheers. Mark Lawrence.
Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.python
csiph-web