Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.python > #20240 > unrolled thread

Re: Python usage numbers

Started byMark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk>
First post2012-02-11 22:17 +0000
Last post2012-02-11 22:17 +0000
Articles 1 — 1 participant

Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.python

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: Python usage numbers Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-02-11 22:17 +0000

#20240 — Re: Python usage numbers

FromMark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk>
Date2012-02-11 22:17 +0000
SubjectRe: Python usage numbers
Message-ID<mailman.5709.1328998635.27778.python-list@python.org>
On 11/02/2012 21:02, Eric Snow wrote:
> Does anyone have (or know of) accurate totals and percentages on how
> Python is used?  I'm particularly interested in the following
> groupings:
>
> - new development vs. stable code-bases
> - categories (web, scripts, "big data", computation, etc.)
> - "bare metal" vs. on top of some framework
> - regional usage
>
> I'm thinking about this partly because of the discussion on
> python-ideas about the perceived challenges of Unicode in Python 3.
> All the rhetoric, anecdotal evidence, and use-cases there have little
> meaning to me, in regards to Python as a whole, without an
> understanding of who is actually affected.
>
> For instance, if frameworks (like django and numpy) could completely
> hide the arguable challenges of Unicode in Python 3--and most projects
> were built on top of frameworks--then general efforts for making
> Unicode easier in Python 3 should go toward helping framework writers.
>
> Not only are such usage numbers useful for the Unicode discussion
> (which I wish would get resolved and die so we could move on to more
> interesting stuff :) ).  They help us know where efforts could be
> focused in general to make Python more powerful and easier to use
> where it's already used extensively.  They can show us the areas that
> Python isn't used much, thus exposing a targeted opportunity to change
> that.
>
> Realistically, it's not entirely feasible to compile such information
> at a comprehensive level, but even generally accurate numbers would be
> a valuable resource.  If the numbers aren't out there, what would some
> good approaches to discovering them?  Thanks!
>
> -eric

As others have said on other Python newsgroups it ain't a problem.  The 
only time I've ever had a problem was with matplotlib which couldn't 
print a £ sign.  I used a U to enforce unicode job done.  If I had a 
major problem I reckon that a search on c.l.p would give me an answer 
easy peasy.

-- 
Cheers.

Mark Lawrence.

[toc] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.python


csiph-web