Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.python > #92788

Re: Classic OOP in Python

Return-Path <lac@openend.se>
X-Original-To python-list@python.org
Delivered-To python-list@mail.python.org
X-Spam-Status OK 0.008
X-Spam-Evidence '*H*': 0.98; '*S*': 0.00; 'subject:Python': 0.05; 'great.': 0.07; 'received:openend.se': 0.09; 'received:theraft.openend.se': 0.09; 'cc:addr:python-list': 0.10; 'wed,': 0.15; '>in': 0.16; 'brave,': 0.16; 'from:addr:lac': 0.16; 'from:addr:openend.se': 0.16; 'from:name:laura creighton': 0.16; 'message-id:@fido.openend.se': 0.16; 'received:89.233': 0.16; 'received:89.233.217': 0.16; 'received:89.233.217.133': 0.16; 'received:fido': 0.16; 'received:fido.openend.se': 0.16; 'subject:OOP': 0.16; 'tool.': 0.16; 'laura': 0.18; 'tests': 0.18; 'cc:2**0': 0.21; 'cc:addr:python.org': 0.21; 'advocate': 0.22; 'either.': 0.22; 'pass': 0.22; 'cc:no real name:2**0': 0.23; '2015': 0.23; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.24; 'sort': 0.25; '-0700,': 0.29; 'received:se': 0.29; 'supposed': 0.31; 'true.': 0.33; 'url:code': 0.34; 'that,': 0.34; 'but': 0.36; 'tool': 0.36; 'possible': 0.36; "didn't": 0.37; 'subject:: ': 0.37; 'charset:us- ascii': 0.37; 'thank': 0.39; 'back': 0.61; 'even': 0.61; 'header :Message-Id:1': 0.62; 'great': 0.64; 'person.': 0.70; 'enjoy': 0.70; 'received:89': 0.80; 'batchelder': 0.84; 'subject:Classic': 0.84; 'convinced': 0.93; 'deal,': 0.93; 'man.': 0.93; 'baby': 0.95
To Ned Batchelder <ned@nedbatchelder.com>
cc python-list@python.org
From Laura Creighton <lac@openend.se>
Subject Re: Classic OOP in Python
In-Reply-To Message from Ned Batchelder <ned@nedbatchelder.com> of "Wed, 17 Jun 2015 14:14:34 -0700." <49f789cf-cb67-4812-8a91-218a4f049958@googlegroups.com>
References <23b2fae3-91d5-486b-9898-78b34bee486f@googlegroups.com> <16dc8c92-50e3-4fc8-ae25-cbc5b13e8971@googlegroups.com> <87eglaqdca.fsf@elektro.pacujo.net><49f789cf-cb67-4812-8a91-218a4f049958@googlegroups.com>
MIME-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID <2275.1434580391.1@fido>
Date Thu, 18 Jun 2015 00:33:11 +0200
X-Greylist Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.3.9 (theraft.openend.se [89.233.217.130]); Thu, 18 Jun 2015 00:33:15 +0200 (CEST)
X-BeenThere python-list@python.org
X-Mailman-Version 2.1.20+
Precedence list
List-Id General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org>
List-Unsubscribe <https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/>
List-Post <mailto:python-list@python.org>
List-Help <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe <https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe>
Newsgroups comp.lang.python
Message-ID <mailman.569.1434580406.13271.python-list@python.org> (permalink)
Lines 31
NNTP-Posting-Host 2001:888:2000:d::a6
X-Trace 1434580406 news.xs4all.nl 2825 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:40334
X-Complaints-To abuse@xs4all.nl
Path csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!news.stben.net!border1.nntp.ams1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed7.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail
Xref csiph.com comp.lang.python:92788

Show key headers only | View raw

In a message of Wed, 17 Jun 2015 14:14:34 -0700, Ned Batchelder writes:

>The true TDD acolytes advocate a very idiosyncratic workflow, it's true.
>I don't do this, but I also don't consider myself a TDD person. I value
>tests a great deal, and put a lot of effort into them, but I don't write
>trivial functions to get my tests to pass and then go back to change them.

Grrr.  I am a true TDD acolyte.  And I don't do that either.

>But people whose opinion I value do advocate that, and it's possible that
>in time I will understand their methods and use them myself.  Stranger
>things have happened...
>
>--Ned.

Seriously?  Oh you humble man.

I have convinced a huge number of people who used to have that sort of
dogma that the reason they advocated such baby steps is that they
didn't have a good coverage tool. ***grin***

TDD is supposed to make you brave, not cowards, and it's
Ned's most excellent tool
http://nedbatchelder.com/code/coverage/
that I recommend to TDD dogmatic cowards.

Even if you don't want to use TTD, you will enjoy Ned's tool.  It's GREAT.
Thank you, Ned.

Laura

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Classic OOP in Python "Jason P." <suscricions@gmail.com> - 2015-06-17 12:21 -0700
  Re: Classic OOP in Python Skip Montanaro <skip.montanaro@gmail.com> - 2015-06-17 14:38 -0500
  Re: Classic OOP in Python Ned Batchelder <ned@nedbatchelder.com> - 2015-06-17 12:44 -0700
    Re: Classic OOP in Python Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2015-06-17 23:39 +0300
      Re: Classic OOP in Python Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2015-06-17 22:07 +0100
      Re: Classic OOP in Python Ned Batchelder <ned@nedbatchelder.com> - 2015-06-17 14:14 -0700
        Re: Classic OOP in Python Laura Creighton <lac@openend.se> - 2015-06-18 00:33 +0200
          Re: Classic OOP in Python Ned Batchelder <ned@nedbatchelder.com> - 2015-06-17 15:55 -0700
        Re: Classic OOP in Python Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2015-06-18 11:50 +0100
        Re: Classic OOP in Python Laura Creighton <lac@openend.se> - 2015-06-19 01:01 +0200
        Re: Classic OOP in Python Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2015-06-20 23:52 +0100
        Re: Classic OOP in Python Laura Creighton <lac@openend.se> - 2015-06-21 10:26 +0200
      Re: Classic OOP in Python sohcahtoa82@gmail.com - 2015-06-17 14:33 -0700
        Re: Classic OOP in Python Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2015-06-17 22:49 +0100
        Re: Classic OOP in Python Laura Creighton <lac@openend.se> - 2015-06-18 00:22 +0200
        Re: Classic OOP in Python Marco Buttu <marco.buttu@gmail.com> - 2015-06-18 11:00 +0200
      Re: Classic OOP in Python Laura Creighton <lac@openend.se> - 2015-06-18 00:09 +0200
      Re: Classic OOP in Python Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2015-06-17 23:27 +0100
      Re: Classic OOP in Python Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> - 2015-06-18 08:58 +1000
        Re: Classic OOP in Python Cousin Stanley <cousinstanley@gmail.com> - 2015-06-18 08:10 -0700
      Re: Classic OOP in Python Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2015-06-17 19:46 -0400
      Re: Classic OOP in Python Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2015-06-18 10:07 +1000
      Re: Classic OOP in Python "Jason P." <suscricions@gmail.com> - 2015-06-18 04:24 -0700
    Re: Classic OOP in Python "Jason P." <suscricions@gmail.com> - 2015-06-18 04:21 -0700
      Re: Classic OOP in Python Ned Batchelder <ned@nedbatchelder.com> - 2015-06-18 04:54 -0700
    Re: Classic OOP in Python "Jason P." <suscricions@gmail.com> - 2015-06-18 04:22 -0700
  Re: Classic OOP in Python sohcahtoa82@gmail.com - 2015-06-17 14:16 -0700
    Re: Classic OOP in Python Fabien <fabien.maussion@gmail.com> - 2015-06-18 13:03 +0200
      Re: Classic OOP in Python Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2015-06-18 14:25 +0300
      Re: Classic OOP in Python Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2015-06-18 21:43 +1000

csiph-web