Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #92780
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-06-17 14:14 -0700 |
| References | <23b2fae3-91d5-486b-9898-78b34bee486f@googlegroups.com> <16dc8c92-50e3-4fc8-ae25-cbc5b13e8971@googlegroups.com> <87eglaqdca.fsf@elektro.pacujo.net> |
| Message-ID | <49f789cf-cb67-4812-8a91-218a4f049958@googlegroups.com> (permalink) |
| Subject | Re: Classic OOP in Python |
| From | Ned Batchelder <ned@nedbatchelder.com> |
On Wednesday, June 17, 2015 at 4:39:31 PM UTC-4, Marko Rauhamaa wrote:
> The way it was explained to me was that in TDD you actually don't write
> code to any requirements or design: you simply do the least to pass the
> tests. Thus, say you need to write a program that inputs a string and
> outputs the same string surrounded by parentheses (the requirement), the
> starting point might be this test case:
>
> - run the program
> - give it the word "hello" as input
> - check that the program prints out "(hello)"
>
> The right TDD thing would be to satisfy the test with this program:
>
> input()
> print("(hello)")
>
> That *ought* to be the first version of the program until further test
> cases are added that invalidate it.
The true TDD acolytes advocate a very idiosyncratic workflow, it's true.
I don't do this, but I also don't consider myself a TDD person. I value
tests a great deal, and put a lot of effort into them, but I don't write
trivial functions to get my tests to pass and then go back to change them.
But people whose opinion I value do advocate that, and it's possible that
in time I will understand their methods and use them myself. Stranger
things have happened...
--Ned.
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Classic OOP in Python "Jason P." <suscricions@gmail.com> - 2015-06-17 12:21 -0700
Re: Classic OOP in Python Skip Montanaro <skip.montanaro@gmail.com> - 2015-06-17 14:38 -0500
Re: Classic OOP in Python Ned Batchelder <ned@nedbatchelder.com> - 2015-06-17 12:44 -0700
Re: Classic OOP in Python Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2015-06-17 23:39 +0300
Re: Classic OOP in Python Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2015-06-17 22:07 +0100
Re: Classic OOP in Python Ned Batchelder <ned@nedbatchelder.com> - 2015-06-17 14:14 -0700
Re: Classic OOP in Python Laura Creighton <lac@openend.se> - 2015-06-18 00:33 +0200
Re: Classic OOP in Python Ned Batchelder <ned@nedbatchelder.com> - 2015-06-17 15:55 -0700
Re: Classic OOP in Python Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2015-06-18 11:50 +0100
Re: Classic OOP in Python Laura Creighton <lac@openend.se> - 2015-06-19 01:01 +0200
Re: Classic OOP in Python Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2015-06-20 23:52 +0100
Re: Classic OOP in Python Laura Creighton <lac@openend.se> - 2015-06-21 10:26 +0200
Re: Classic OOP in Python sohcahtoa82@gmail.com - 2015-06-17 14:33 -0700
Re: Classic OOP in Python Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2015-06-17 22:49 +0100
Re: Classic OOP in Python Laura Creighton <lac@openend.se> - 2015-06-18 00:22 +0200
Re: Classic OOP in Python Marco Buttu <marco.buttu@gmail.com> - 2015-06-18 11:00 +0200
Re: Classic OOP in Python Laura Creighton <lac@openend.se> - 2015-06-18 00:09 +0200
Re: Classic OOP in Python Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2015-06-17 23:27 +0100
Re: Classic OOP in Python Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> - 2015-06-18 08:58 +1000
Re: Classic OOP in Python Cousin Stanley <cousinstanley@gmail.com> - 2015-06-18 08:10 -0700
Re: Classic OOP in Python Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2015-06-17 19:46 -0400
Re: Classic OOP in Python Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2015-06-18 10:07 +1000
Re: Classic OOP in Python "Jason P." <suscricions@gmail.com> - 2015-06-18 04:24 -0700
Re: Classic OOP in Python "Jason P." <suscricions@gmail.com> - 2015-06-18 04:21 -0700
Re: Classic OOP in Python Ned Batchelder <ned@nedbatchelder.com> - 2015-06-18 04:54 -0700
Re: Classic OOP in Python "Jason P." <suscricions@gmail.com> - 2015-06-18 04:22 -0700
Re: Classic OOP in Python sohcahtoa82@gmail.com - 2015-06-17 14:16 -0700
Re: Classic OOP in Python Fabien <fabien.maussion@gmail.com> - 2015-06-18 13:03 +0200
Re: Classic OOP in Python Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2015-06-18 14:25 +0300
Re: Classic OOP in Python Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2015-06-18 21:43 +1000
csiph-web