Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #3560
| Path | csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!aioe.org!feeder.news-service.com!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed5.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| Return-Path | <anikom15@gmail.com> |
| X-Original-To | python-list@python.org |
| Delivered-To | python-list@mail.python.org |
| X-Spam-Status | OK 0.019 |
| X-Spam-Evidence | '*H*': 0.96; '*S*': 0.00; 'exception.': 0.09; 'pm,': 0.11; '>>>': 0.12; 'slightly': 0.12; 'binary': 0.14; 'wrote:': 0.14; '(another': 0.16; '(last': 0.16; 'boolean': 0.16; 'contrived': 0.16; 'exploits': 0.16; 'expression)': 0.16; 'false)': 0.16; 'mean,': 0.16; 'met.': 0.16; 'packet': 0.16; 'situations,': 0.16; 'subject:() ': 0.16; 'subject:function': 0.16; 'tue,': 0.20; 'maybe': 0.21; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.22; 'posted': 0.22; 'subject:code': 0.23; 'example': 0.24; 'received:209.85.212': 0.25; 'compare': 0.26; 'equivalent': 0.26; 'chris': 0.27; 'raise': 0.29; "won't": 0.30; 'skip:( 20': 0.31; 'guarantees': 0.31; 'recall': 0.31; 'does': 0.31; "can't": 0.31; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.32; '...': 0.32; "i've": 0.33; 'done,': 0.33; 'from:charset:iso-8859-1': 0.33; 'fairly': 0.33; "isn't": 0.34; 'received:192': 0.34; 'received:192.168.0': 0.35; 'christian': 0.35; 'flag': 0.35; 'received:192.168': 0.37; 'case': 0.37; 'received:209.85': 0.37; 'useful': 0.37; 'apr': 0.38; 'steven': 0.38; 'received:google.com': 0.38; 'but': 0.38; 'explain': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'where': 0.39; 'received:209': 0.39; 'header:Mime-Version:1': 0.39; 'how': 0.39; 'would': 0.40; 'header:Received:5': 0.40; 'direct': 0.61; '2011': 0.62; 'message-id:@localhost.localdomain': 0.74; 'guarantee': 0.75; 'exclusive': 0.77; 'satisfied': 0.83; 'concept:': 0.84; 'specifics': 0.84; 'suspicious': 0.84; 'sum': 0.89; 'or:': 0.91 |
| DKIM-Signature | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:subject:from:to:in-reply-to:references :content-type:date:message-id:mime-version:x-mailer :content-transfer-encoding; bh=sOd/Me2oiwbx0e2xcm52OkCv1KUu/jz1TDq2cXipNKQ=; b=GOepY7GxZ7pldAbvHKUEtdVRf86QKq6AOdyRN4aHH2iLT+TKlNwjkFhspSdWb213Kt FZuGvJI1kunsvJRlMxKChHEuj5Aw5oc/PhXSyizTjkk1RdtCUiVmg/6X/J3mRQ+9BjmE jx0LIwqVK5Nwn1mN4MvS03DVl9OayUnZ+3lDw= |
| DomainKey-Signature | a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=subject:from:to:in-reply-to:references:content-type:date:message-id :mime-version:x-mailer:content-transfer-encoding; b=LQF65AzNxhI1itim9N+/HOWP1i1WFjVo9Jwn6VOczZ0Nhjj70eowToUTlp7jSK2pm1 R2tn48V6R6MfqaJ0cg2V1Bmz4I0JTsxC6McIDgtVBnoPjyq+IzijMCvGt/2udHUl29VP g8GRNIe9ddBgehKIpzjz0/CdW9gvrPeYUq71o= |
| Subject | Re: Equivalent code to the bool() built-in function |
| From | Westley MartÃnez <anikom15@gmail.com> |
| To | python-list@python.org |
| In-Reply-To | <BANLkTi=K+jNchynoomeN9aeMY4gqUHvJ4A@mail.gmail.com> |
| References | <4da9fb0b$0$13696$426a74cc@news.free.fr> <mailman.442.1302987518.9059.python-list@python.org> <87k4etho6e.fsf@benfinney.id.au> <4daa2b72$0$32037$426a74cc@news.free.fr> <87d3klha85.fsf@benfinney.id.au> <4daaa6f6$0$20187$426a74cc@news.free.fr> <mailman.453.1303029985.9059.python-list@python.org> <911dvfF6ocU1@mid.individual.net> <4dac97ca$0$10609$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net> <ioip56$btd$1@dough.gmane.org> <BANLkTi=C9nz7zVvBr0nPMiKgO9hkWo2uKA@mail.gmail.com> <mailman.549.1303194413.9059.python-list@python.org> <4dad4b29$0$29984$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <BANLkTi=K+jNchynoomeN9aeMY4gqUHvJ4A@mail.gmail.com> |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset="UTF-8" |
| Date | Tue, 19 Apr 2011 06:43:45 -0700 |
| Mime-Version | 1.0 |
| X-Mailer | Evolution 2.32.2 |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 7bit |
| X-BeenThere | python-list@python.org |
| X-Mailman-Version | 2.1.12 |
| Precedence | list |
| List-Id | General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org> |
| List-Unsubscribe | <http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe> |
| List-Archive | <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list> |
| List-Post | <mailto:python-list@python.org> |
| List-Help | <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help> |
| List-Subscribe | <http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.559.1303220632.9059.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
| Lines | 41 |
| NNTP-Posting-Host | 82.94.164.166 |
| X-Trace | 1303220633 news.xs4all.nl 41103 [::ffff:82.94.164.166]:46587 |
| X-Complaints-To | abuse@xs4all.nl |
| Xref | x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.python:3560 |
Show key headers only | View raw
On Tue, 2011-04-19 at 19:00 +1000, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 6:43 PM, Steven D'Aprano
> <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> wrote:
> > but I don't see how
> >
> > (arbitrary expression) + (another expression) + ... + (last expression)
> >
> > can have any guarantees applied. I mean, you can't even guarantee that
> > they won't raise an exception. Can you explain what you mean?
>
> What Christian posted isn't something I've often done, but here's
> something slightly different that exploits the same
> comparisons-return-summable-values concept:
>
> A condition with N subconditions is deemed to be satisfied if a
> minimum of M of them are true. This is a general case of the boolean
> Or (N = 2, M = 1) and And (N = 2, M = 2), but does not have a direct
> equivalent in binary operators. You simply sum the subconditions,
> compare against M, and you have your answer.
>
> if (((port<1024) + (!ip.startswith("192.168.")) +
> (greylist[ip]>time()) + (++spewcnt>10))>=3) // flag this packet as
> suspicious
>
> Contrived example as I don't recall any specifics right now, but this
> will pick up any packets where three or more of the conditions are
> met. Useful only in fairly specific situations, but I don't know of
> any way to do this with just AND/OR/NOT that would be as clear and
> simple.
>
> Chris Angelico
Exclusive or:
>>> if not (True and False and False and False) or
(False and True and False and False) or
(False and False and True and False) or
(False and False and False and True):
... print(True)
Maybe a little silly.
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Equivalent code to the bool() built-in function candide <candide@free.invalid> - 2011-04-16 22:24 +0200
Re: Equivalent code to the bool() built-in function Chris Rebert <clp2@rebertia.com> - 2011-04-16 13:58 -0700
Re: Equivalent code to the bool() built-in function Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> - 2011-04-17 07:38 +1000
Re: Equivalent code to the bool() built-in function candide <candide@free.invalid> - 2011-04-17 01:51 +0200
Re: Equivalent code to the bool() built-in function Chris Rebert <clp2@rebertia.com> - 2011-04-16 17:16 -0700
Re: Equivalent code to the bool() built-in function Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> - 2011-04-17 12:39 +1000
Re: Equivalent code to the bool() built-in function candide <candide@free.invalid> - 2011-04-17 10:38 +0200
Re: Equivalent code to the bool() built-in function Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2011-04-17 18:46 +1000
Re: Equivalent code to the bool() built-in function Gregory Ewing <greg.ewing@canterbury.ac.nz> - 2011-04-18 12:12 +1200
Re: Equivalent code to the bool() built-in function John Nagle <nagle@animats.com> - 2011-04-18 12:58 -0700
Re: Equivalent code to the bool() built-in function Gregory Ewing <greg.ewing@canterbury.ac.nz> - 2011-04-19 12:18 +1200
Re: Equivalent code to the bool() built-in function Christian Heimes <lists@cheimes.de> - 2011-04-19 03:39 +0200
Re: Equivalent code to the bool() built-in function Kushal Kumaran <kushal.kumaran+python@gmail.com> - 2011-04-19 11:53 +0530
Re: Equivalent code to the bool() built-in function Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2011-04-19 14:23 +0000
Re: Equivalent code to the bool() built-in function Jean-Paul Calderone <calderone.jeanpaul@gmail.com> - 2011-04-19 08:43 -0700
Re: Equivalent code to the bool() built-in function Gregory Ewing <greg.ewing@canterbury.ac.nz> - 2011-04-20 11:59 +1200
Re: Equivalent code to the bool() built-in function Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2011-04-19 16:26 +1000
Re: Equivalent code to the bool() built-in function Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2011-04-19 08:43 +0000
Re: Equivalent code to the bool() built-in function Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2011-04-19 19:00 +1000
Re: Equivalent code to the bool() built-in function Westley MartÃnez <anikom15@gmail.com> - 2011-04-19 06:43 -0700
Re: Equivalent code to the bool() built-in function Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> - 2011-04-17 19:46 +1000
Re: Equivalent code to the bool() built-in function candide <candide@free.invalid> - 2011-04-18 01:22 +0200
Re: Equivalent code to the bool() built-in function Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> - 2011-04-18 09:46 +1000
Re: Equivalent code to the bool() built-in function Gregory Ewing <greg.ewing@canterbury.ac.nz> - 2011-04-18 12:08 +1200
Re: Equivalent code to the bool() built-in function Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2011-04-18 00:22 +0000
Re: Equivalent code to the bool() built-in function Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2011-04-18 10:52 +1000
Re: Equivalent code to the bool() built-in function Duncan Booth <duncan.booth@invalid.invalid> - 2011-04-18 10:01 +0000
Re: Equivalent code to the bool() built-in function Daniel Kluev <dan.kluev@gmail.com> - 2011-04-17 21:11 +1100
Re: Equivalent code to the bool() built-in function Daniel Kluev <dan.kluev@gmail.com> - 2011-04-18 10:45 +1100
Re: Equivalent code to the bool() built-in function Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> - 2011-04-18 10:36 +1000
Re: Re: Equivalent code to the bool() built-in function Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2011-04-18 11:52 +1000
Re: Re: Equivalent code to the bool() built-in function Dave Angel <davea@ieee.org> - 2011-04-17 21:46 -0400
Re: Re: Equivalent code to the bool() built-in function Daniel Kluev <dan.kluev@gmail.com> - 2011-04-18 14:16 +1100
Re: Equivalent code to the bool() built-in function Ned Deily <nad@acm.org> - 2011-04-17 21:40 -0700
Re: Equivalent code to the bool() built-in function Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2011-04-18 14:53 +1000
Re: Equivalent code to the bool() built-in function Gregory Ewing <greg.ewing@canterbury.ac.nz> - 2011-04-19 12:22 +1200
Re: Equivalent code to the bool() built-in function Chris Rebert <clp2@rebertia.com> - 2011-04-17 22:49 -0700
Re: Equivalent code to the bool() built-in function Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2011-04-18 06:14 +0000
Re: Equivalent code to the bool() built-in function Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2011-04-18 16:03 +1000
Re: Equivalent code to the bool() built-in function Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> - 2011-04-17 07:13 +1000
Re: Equivalent code to the bool() built-in function candide <candide@free.invalid> - 2011-04-17 01:51 +0200
Re: Equivalent code to the bool() built-in function Raymond Hettinger <python@rcn.com> - 2011-04-18 01:33 -0700
Re: Equivalent code to the bool() built-in function candide <candide@free.invalid> - 2011-04-18 11:19 +0200
csiph-web