Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.python > #64050

Re: data validation when creating an object

Path csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!goblin2!goblin.stu.neva.ru!newsfeed1.swip.net!uio.no!news.tele.dk!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail
Return-Path <python-python-list@m.gmane.org>
X-Original-To python-list@python.org
Delivered-To python-list@mail.python.org
X-Spam-Status OK 0.000
X-Spam-Evidence '*H*': 1.00; '*S*': 0.00; 'python.': 0.02; 'argument': 0.05; 'advocate': 0.07; 'context': 0.07; 'conventions': 0.07; 'advice.': 0.09; 'constructor': 0.09; 'indeed,': 0.09; 'received:80.91': 0.09; 'received:80.91.229': 0.09; 'received:gmane.org': 0.09; 'received:list': 0.09; 'specific.': 0.09; "they've": 0.09; 'vast': 0.09; 'python': 0.11; 'c++.': 0.16; 'cons': 0.16; 'constructor.': 0.16; 'finney': 0.16; 'received:80.91.229.3': 0.16; 'received:plane.gmane.org': 0.16; 'roy': 0.16; 'subject:object': 0.16; 'subject:when': 0.16; 'all.': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; 'normally': 0.19; 'later': 0.20; 'seems': 0.21; 'saying': 0.22; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.23; 'why.': 0.24; 'define': 0.26; 'header:X-Complaints-To:1': 0.27; 'function': 0.29; '(this': 0.29; 'statement': 0.30; 'work.': 0.31; 'argue': 0.31; 'commonly': 0.31; 'writes:': 0.31; 'class': 0.32; 'probably': 0.32; 'languages': 0.32; 'says': 0.33; 'beginning': 0.33; 'programmers': 0.33; "i'd": 0.34; 'advice': 0.35; 'agree': 0.35; 'classes': 0.35; 'but': 0.35; 'there': 0.35; 'c++': 0.36; 'instances': 0.36; 'largely': 0.36; 'subject:data': 0.36; 'doing': 0.36; 'should': 0.36; 'ben': 0.38; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.38; 'anything': 0.39; 'does': 0.39; 'use.': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'enough': 0.39; 'received:org': 0.40; 'even': 0.60; 'skip:u 10': 0.60; 'read': 0.60; 'new': 0.61; 'skip:* 10': 0.61; 'skip:\xe2 10': 0.65; '8bit%:40': 0.68; 'smith': 0.68; 'subject': 0.69; '8bit%:43': 0.74; 'belief': 0.84; 'mistaken': 0.84
X-Injected-Via-Gmane http://gmane.org/
To python-list@python.org
From Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au>
Subject Re: data validation when creating an object
Date Thu, 16 Jan 2014 15:53:56 +1100
References <CAOF-KfigMrCKz+O9_o6C+PBk6OB8hjOkUTWPW9PLfpobYO_kTw@mail.gmail.com> <mailman.5555.1389834993.18130.python-list@python.org> <roy-BA09BB.23054615012014@news.panix.com>
Mime-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding 8bit
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host rasputin.madmonks.org
X-Public-Key-ID 0xAC128405
X-Public-Key-Fingerprint 517C F14B B2F3 98B0 CB35 4855 B8B2 4C06 AC12 8405
X-Public-Key-URL http://www.benfinney.id.au/contact/bfinney-gpg.asc
X-Post-From Ben Finney <bignose+hates-spam@benfinney.id.au>
User-Agent Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.4 (gnu/linux)
Cancel-Lock sha1:6PfTrWHMp96/IXtJJNYEhNvGS9U=
X-BeenThere python-list@python.org
X-Mailman-Version 2.1.15
Precedence list
List-Id General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org>
List-Unsubscribe <https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/>
List-Post <mailto:python-list@python.org>
List-Help <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe <https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe>
Newsgroups comp.lang.python
Message-ID <mailman.5567.1389848051.18130.python-list@python.org> (permalink)
Lines 44
NNTP-Posting-Host 2001:888:2000:d::a6
X-Trace 1389848051 news.xs4all.nl 2856 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:47080
X-Complaints-To abuse@xs4all.nl
Xref csiph.com comp.lang.python:64050

Show key headers only | View raw


Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> writes:

>  Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> wrote:
>
> > Who says it's frowned on to do work in the initialiser? Where are they
> > saying it? That seems over-broad, I'd like to read the context of that
> > advice.
>
> There are some people who advocate that C++ constructors should not do
> a lot of work and/or should be incapable of throwing exceptions. The
> pros and cons of that argument are largely C++ specific. […]
>
> But, Python is not C++. I suspect the people who argue for __init__()
> not doing much are extrapolating a C++ pattern to other languages
> without fully understanding the reason why.

Even simpler: They are mistaken in what the constructor is named, in
Python.

Python classes have the constructor, ‘__new__’. I would agree with
advice not to do anything but allocate the resources for a new instance
in the constructor.

Indeed, the constructor from ‘object’ does a good enough job that the
vast majority of Python classes never need a custom constructor at all.

(This is probably why many beginning programmers are confused about what
the constructor is called: They've never seen a class with its own
constructor!)

Python instances have an initialiser, ‘__init__’. That function is for
setting up the specific instance for later use. This is commonly
over-ridden and many classes define a custom initialiser, which normally
does some amount of work.

I don't think ‘__init__’ is subject to the conventions of a constructor,
because *‘__init__’ is not a constructor*.

-- 
 \        “Absurdity, n. A statement or belief manifestly inconsistent |
  `\            with one's own opinion.” —Ambrose Bierce, _The Devil's |
_o__)                                                Dictionary_, 1906 |
Ben Finney

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: data validation when creating an object Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> - 2014-01-16 12:16 +1100
  Re: data validation when creating an object Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2014-01-15 23:05 -0500
    Re: data validation when creating an object Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> - 2014-01-16 15:53 +1100
      Re: data validation when creating an object Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2014-01-16 00:05 -0500
    Re: data validation when creating an object Robert Kern <robert.kern@gmail.com> - 2014-01-16 15:46 +0000
      Re: data validation when creating an object Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2014-01-16 08:18 -0800
        Re: data validation when creating an object Robert Kern <robert.kern@gmail.com> - 2014-01-16 16:58 +0000
    Re: data validation when creating an object Skip Montanaro <skip@pobox.com> - 2014-01-16 10:44 -0600

csiph-web