Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #64048
| From | Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Subject | Re: data validation when creating an object |
| Date | 2014-01-15 23:05 -0500 |
| Organization | PANIX Public Access Internet and UNIX, NYC |
| Message-ID | <roy-BA09BB.23054615012014@news.panix.com> (permalink) |
| References | <CAOF-KfigMrCKz+O9_o6C+PBk6OB8hjOkUTWPW9PLfpobYO_kTw@mail.gmail.com> <mailman.5555.1389834993.18130.python-list@python.org> |
Rita <rmorgan466@gmail.com> writes: >> I know its frowned upon to do work in the __init__() method and only >> declarations should be there. In article <mailman.5555.1389834993.18130.python-list@python.org>, Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> wrote: > Who says it's frowned on to do work in the initialiser? Where are they > saying it? That seems over-broad, I'd like to read the context of that > advice. Weird, I was just having this conversation at work earlier this week. There are some people who advocate that C++ constructors should not do a lot of work and/or should be incapable of throwing exceptions. The pros and cons of that argument are largely C++ specific. Here's a Stack Overflow thread which covers most of the usual arguments on both sides: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/293967/how-much-work-should-be-done-in -a-constructor But, Python is not C++. I suspect the people who argue for __init__() not doing much are extrapolating a C++ pattern to other languages without fully understanding the reason why. That being said, I've been on a tear lately, trying to get our unit test suite to run faster. I came across one slow test which had an interesting twist. The class being tested had an __init__() method which read over 900,000 records from a database and took something like 5-10 seconds to run. Man, talk about heavy-weight constructors :-)
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: data validation when creating an object Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> - 2014-01-16 12:16 +1100
Re: data validation when creating an object Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2014-01-15 23:05 -0500
Re: data validation when creating an object Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> - 2014-01-16 15:53 +1100
Re: data validation when creating an object Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2014-01-16 00:05 -0500
Re: data validation when creating an object Robert Kern <robert.kern@gmail.com> - 2014-01-16 15:46 +0000
Re: data validation when creating an object Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2014-01-16 08:18 -0800
Re: data validation when creating an object Robert Kern <robert.kern@gmail.com> - 2014-01-16 16:58 +0000
Re: data validation when creating an object Skip Montanaro <skip@pobox.com> - 2014-01-16 10:44 -0600
csiph-web