Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #43439
| Date | 2013-04-12 07:42 -0400 |
|---|---|
| From | Ned Batchelder <ned@nedbatchelder.com> |
| Subject | Re: Message passing syntax for objects | OOPv2 |
| References | <CAMjeLr_eJf1Aboz=2+oti4TOV=oejUYVo7K4zks+Ck4CSHaqpg@mail.gmail.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.515.1365766965.3114.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
On 4/11/2013 9:57 PM, Mark Janssen wrote: > Okay peeps, I'm re-opening this thread, because despite being hijacked > by naysayers, the merit of the underlying idea I think still has not > been communicated or perceived adequately. Mark, this proposal is out of place on a Python list, because it proposes an object methodology radically different from any that is implemented in Python now, or is even remotely likely to be implemented in Python in the future. Everyone else, there's no need to skewer Mark for off-topic things like tweets on topics other than Python. We can be civil, surely. --Ned.
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Message passing syntax for objects | OOPv2 Ned Batchelder <ned@nedbatchelder.com> - 2013-04-12 07:42 -0400
csiph-web