Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #43439 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Ned Batchelder <ned@nedbatchelder.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2013-04-12 07:42 -0400 |
| Last post | 2013-04-12 07:42 -0400 |
| Articles | 1 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.python
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: Message passing syntax for objects | OOPv2 Ned Batchelder <ned@nedbatchelder.com> - 2013-04-12 07:42 -0400
| From | Ned Batchelder <ned@nedbatchelder.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-04-12 07:42 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: Message passing syntax for objects | OOPv2 |
| Message-ID | <mailman.515.1365766965.3114.python-list@python.org> |
On 4/11/2013 9:57 PM, Mark Janssen wrote: > Okay peeps, I'm re-opening this thread, because despite being hijacked > by naysayers, the merit of the underlying idea I think still has not > been communicated or perceived adequately. Mark, this proposal is out of place on a Python list, because it proposes an object methodology radically different from any that is implemented in Python now, or is even remotely likely to be implemented in Python in the future. Everyone else, there's no need to skewer Mark for off-topic things like tweets on topics other than Python. We can be civil, surely. --Ned.
Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.python
csiph-web