Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.python > #43439 > unrolled thread

Re: Message passing syntax for objects | OOPv2

Started byNed Batchelder <ned@nedbatchelder.com>
First post2013-04-12 07:42 -0400
Last post2013-04-12 07:42 -0400
Articles 1 — 1 participant

Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.python

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: Message passing syntax for objects | OOPv2 Ned Batchelder <ned@nedbatchelder.com> - 2013-04-12 07:42 -0400

#43439 — Re: Message passing syntax for objects | OOPv2

FromNed Batchelder <ned@nedbatchelder.com>
Date2013-04-12 07:42 -0400
SubjectRe: Message passing syntax for objects | OOPv2
Message-ID<mailman.515.1365766965.3114.python-list@python.org>
On 4/11/2013 9:57 PM, Mark Janssen wrote:
> Okay peeps, I'm re-opening this thread, because despite being hijacked
> by naysayers, the merit of the underlying idea I think still has not
> been communicated or perceived adequately.
Mark, this proposal is out of place on a Python list, because it 
proposes an object methodology radically different from any that is 
implemented in Python now, or is even remotely likely to be implemented 
in Python in the future.

Everyone else, there's no need to skewer Mark for off-topic things like 
tweets on topics other than Python.  We can be civil, surely.

--Ned.

[toc] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.python


csiph-web