Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed1.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.002 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 1.00; '*S*': 0.00; 'python.': 0.02; 'okay': 0.09; 'cc:addr:python-list': 0.11; 'python': 0.11; 'cc:name:python list': 0.16; 'janssen': 0.16; 'mark,': 0.16; 'perceived': 0.16; 'received:74.55.86': 0.16; 'received:74.55.86.74': 0.16; 'received:smtp.webfaction.com': 0.16; 'received:webfaction.com': 0.16; 'thread,': 0.16; 'underlying': 0.16; 'topics': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; 'else,': 0.19; 'cc:addr:python.org': 0.22; 'header :User-Agent:1': 0.23; 'cc:2**0': 0.24; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.27; 'idea': 0.28; "i'm": 0.30; 'remotely': 0.31; 'everyone': 0.33; 'implemented': 0.33; 'being': 0.38; 'list,': 0.38; 'pm,': 0.38; 'even': 0.60; 'different': 0.65; 'to:addr:gmail.com': 0.65; 'methodology': 0.68 Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2013 07:42:31 -0400 From: Ned Batchelder User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130328 Thunderbird/17.0.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mark Janssen Subject: Re: Message passing syntax for objects | OOPv2 References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Python List X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 14 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1365766965 news.xs4all.nl 2706 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:42816 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:43439 On 4/11/2013 9:57 PM, Mark Janssen wrote: > Okay peeps, I'm re-opening this thread, because despite being hijacked > by naysayers, the merit of the underlying idea I think still has not > been communicated or perceived adequately. Mark, this proposal is out of place on a Python list, because it proposes an object methodology radically different from any that is implemented in Python now, or is even remotely likely to be implemented in Python in the future. Everyone else, there's no need to skewer Mark for off-topic things like tweets on topics other than Python. We can be civil, surely. --Ned.