Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.python > #63325

Re: "More About Unicode in Python 2 and 3"

From Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk>
Subject Re: "More About Unicode in Python 2 and 3"
Date 2014-01-06 19:36 +0000
References (2 earlier) <CAGGBd_qBA0OBELxgzERO4Tfs6quK7oYq8v_2idA=K2ycoiO6Dg@mail.gmail.com> <mailman.5022.1389022306.18130.python-list@python.org> <52cae78d$0$29971$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <52CAF722.6010301@stoneleaf.us> <CAMjeLr9w8ZaBO6GaFtfQPs=D7Q0M9M718thyjLDwTico2FC07Q@mail.gmail.com>
Newsgroups comp.lang.python
Message-ID <mailman.5046.1389037011.18130.python-list@python.org> (permalink)

Show all headers | View raw


On 06/01/2014 19:30, Mark Janssen wrote:
>>> Chris didn't say "bytes and ascii data", he said "bytes and TEXT".
>>> Text != "ascii data", and the fact that some people apparently think it
>>> does is pretty much the heart of the problem.
>>
>> The heart of a different problem, not this one.  The problem I refer to is
>> that many binary formats have well-defined ascii-encoded text tidbits.
>
> Really?  If people are using binary with "well-defined ascii-encoded
> tidbits", they're doing something wrong.  Perhaps you think escape
> characters "\n" are "well defined tidbits", but YOU WOULD BE WRONG.
> The purpose of binary is to keep things raw.  WTF?  You guys are so
> strange.
>
>>
>>> If you (generic you) don't get that, you'll have a bad time. I mean
>>> *really*
>>> get it, deep down in the bone. The long, bad habit of thinking as
>>> ASCII-encoded bytes as text is the problem here.
>
> I think the whole forking community is confused at because of your own
> arrogance.  Foo(l)s.
>
> markj
>

Looks like another bad batch, time to change your dealer again.

-- 
My fellow Pythonistas, ask not what our language can do for you, ask 
what you can do for our language.

Mark Lawrence

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: "More About Unicode in Python 2 and 3" Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> - 2014-01-06 07:10 -0800
  Re: "More About Unicode in Python 2 and 3" Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2014-01-07 04:27 +1100
    Re: "More About Unicode in Python 2 and 3" Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> - 2014-01-06 10:34 -0800
      Re: "More About Unicode in Python 2 and 3" Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2014-01-07 11:42 +1100
    Re: "More About Unicode in Python 2 and 3" Mark Janssen <dreamingforward@gmail.com> - 2014-01-06 13:30 -0600
    Re: "More About Unicode in Python 2 and 3" Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2014-01-06 19:36 +0000
    Re: "More About Unicode in Python 2 and 3" Mark Janssen <dreamingforward@gmail.com> - 2014-01-06 13:44 -0600
      Re: "More About Unicode in Python 2 and 3" Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2014-01-07 11:54 +1100
    Re: "More About Unicode in Python 2 and 3" Ned Batchelder <ned@nedbatchelder.com> - 2014-01-06 16:14 -0500
    Re: "More About Unicode in Python 2 and 3" Mark Janssen <dreamingforward@gmail.com> - 2014-01-06 15:23 -0600
    Re: "More About Unicode in Python 2 and 3" Mark Janssen <dreamingforward@gmail.com> - 2014-01-06 15:32 -0600
    Re: "More About Unicode in Python 2 and 3" Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-01-07 10:03 +1100

csiph-web