Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #63309
| From | Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> |
|---|---|
| Subject | Re: "More About Unicode in Python 2 and 3" |
| Date | 2014-01-06 17:13 +0000 |
| References | <lablra$1mc$2@ger.gmane.org> <201401060932.35410.gheskett@wdtv.com> <laeg5o$tes$1@ger.gmane.org> <201401061146.18518.gheskett@wdtv.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.5036.1389028448.18130.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
On 06/01/2014 16:46, Gene Heskett wrote: > On Monday 06 January 2014 11:42:55 Mark Lawrence did opine: > >> On 06/01/2014 14:32, Gene Heskett wrote: >>> On Monday 06 January 2014 08:52:42 Ned Batchelder did opine: >>> [...] >>> >>>> You are still talking about whether Armin is right, and whether he >>>> writes well, about flaws in his statistics, etc. I'm talking about >>>> the fact that an organization (Python core development) has a >>>> product (Python 3) that is getting bad press. Popular and vocal >>>> customers (Armin, Kenneth, and others) are unhappy. What is being >>>> done to make them happy? Who is working with them? They are not >>>> unique, and their viewpoints are not outliers. >>>> >>>> I'm not talking about the technical details of bytes and Unicode. >>>> I'm talking about making customers happy. >>> >>> +1 Ned. Quite well said. >>> >>> And from my lurking here, its quite plain to me that 3.x python has a >>> problem with everyday dealing with strings. If it is not solved >>> relatively quickly, then I expect there will be a fork, a 2.8 by >>> those most heavily invested. Or an exodus to the next "cool" >>> language. >> >> It's not at all plain to me, in fact quite the opposite. Please expand >> on these problems for mere mortals such as myself. > > Mortals? Likely nobody here is more acutely aware of his mortality Mark. > > But what is the most common post here asking for help? Tossup as to > whether its database related, or strings. Most everything else seems to be > a pretty distant 3rd. > > Cheers, Gene > > As the take of Python 3 is so poor then that must mean all the problems being reported are still with Python 2. The solution is to upgrade to Python 3.3+ and the superb PEP 393 FSR which is faster and uses less memory. Or is it simply that people are so used to doing things sloppily with Python 2 that they don't like being forced into doing things correctly with Python 3? -- My fellow Pythonistas, ask not what our language can do for you, ask what you can do for our language. Mark Lawrence
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: "More About Unicode in Python 2 and 3" Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2014-01-06 17:13 +0000
csiph-web