Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #63310
| References | <c552f556-4753-42dc-a2ae-e9d974f33949@googlegroups.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-01-07 04:24 +1100 |
| Subject | Re: class inheritance python2.7 vs python3.3 |
| From | Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.5037.1389029091.18130.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 4:14 AM, <jwe.van.dijk@gmail.com> wrote: > class LPU3(LPU1): > def __new__(self): > """ > the same functions as LPU1 but some added functions > and some functions redefined > """ You probably don't want to be using __new__ here. Try using __init__ instead, or simply not defining __new__ at all. I suspect that the reason that appears to work under Py2 is that you're using an old-style class, there. That means it'll be subtly different on the two versions. To make them do the same thing, explicitly subclass object: class LPU1(object): In Python 3, that's redundant - subclassing object is the default. In Python 2, though, it's important. ChrisA
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
class inheritance python2.7 vs python3.3 jwe.van.dijk@gmail.com - 2014-01-06 09:14 -0800 Re: class inheritance python2.7 vs python3.3 Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-01-07 04:24 +1100 Re: class inheritance python2.7 vs python3.3 Dave Angel <davea@davea.name> - 2014-01-06 12:46 -0500 Re: class inheritance python2.7 vs python3.3 Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2014-01-07 05:10 +1100 Re: class inheritance python2.7 vs python3.3 jwe.van.dijk@gmail.com - 2014-01-06 12:57 -0800
csiph-web