Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.python > #3437

Re: Equivalent code to the bool() built-in function

Path csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!aioe.org!news.stack.nl!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed5.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail
Return-Path <dan.kluev@gmail.com>
X-Original-To python-list@python.org
Delivered-To python-list@mail.python.org
X-Spam-Status OK 0.002
X-Spam-Evidence '*H*': 1.00; '*S*': 0.00; 'type,': 0.07; '*name*': 0.09; 'myself,': 0.09; 'object.': 0.09; 'sun,': 0.09; '>>>': 0.12; 'received:74.125.82.174': 0.12; 'received:mail- wy0-f174.google.com': 0.12; 'def': 0.13; 'am,': 0.14; 'wrote:': 0.14; '(err': 0.16; 'boolean': 0.16; 'constructor.': 0.16; 'continue;': 0.16; 'err': 0.16; 'finney': 0.16; 'subject:() ': 0.16; 'subject:function': 0.16; 'besides': 0.19; 'header:In-Reply- To:1': 0.22; 'curious': 0.23; 'subject:code': 0.23; 'calling': 0.25; 'checked': 0.25; 'equivalent': 0.26; 'function': 0.27; 'message-id:@mail.gmail.com': 0.28; 'daniel': 0.29; "won't": 0.30; '17,': 0.31; 'break;': 0.31; 'goto': 0.31; 'fact': 0.31; 'import': 0.32; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.32; "i've": 0.33; 'expression': 0.33; "isn't": 0.34; 'uses': 0.34; 'question': 0.35; 'function.': 0.35; 'rather': 0.36; 'else': 0.37; 'case': 0.37; '8bit%:12': 0.38; 'apr': 0.38; 'received:google.com': 0.38; 'but': 0.38; 'pretty': 0.38; 'sources': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'header:Received:5': 0.40; 'necessarily': 0.40; 'best': 0.60; 'charset:windows-1252': 0.61; '2011': 0.62; 'no:': 0.91; 'technically': 0.93
DKIM-Signature v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=JAD81pBp0r3fXpe/YVe6jUor93OK2ien2QzqgcqwE34=; b=DbyxRBD5A3EUdfATLwDWrD1TnMHMo0ILW1LZjuZuQd3iiTVqoKkq360iNuJcXDt8Nx qI4HvHzu6AcKec97+5Ff8aGiY32IWLFNQQo5e+rLQI5UooPlkUC7XODrUj7fN8Uhp2A3 GiHZmsRbnXzHXtAFoCrP/c0Ke4cjdR9+HdG5o=
DomainKey-Signature a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=cMvdRyXcK+olwrycfx7sg0GYHsfUOeWmWe6enrQ4aO39DBWX/VWFrqx4bZM15TrWZ5 539/5sxYTl7IgRyWofxkQirDDOSyS4gm5D4vZ7BrojHRhDJ4kgg+LFZX4ne+sYltdnkT v/McoFfM1RSt+xD1DVG125/mT7mXnTB2tbE3Q=
MIME-Version 1.0
In-Reply-To <87k4etho6e.fsf@benfinney.id.au>
References <4da9fb0b$0$13696$426a74cc@news.free.fr> <mailman.442.1302987518.9059.python-list@python.org> <87k4etho6e.fsf@benfinney.id.au>
Date Mon, 18 Apr 2011 10:45:16 +1100
Subject Re: Equivalent code to the bool() built-in function
From Daniel Kluev <dan.kluev@gmail.com>
To python-list@python.org
Content-Type text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding quoted-printable
X-BeenThere python-list@python.org
X-Mailman-Version 2.1.12
Precedence list
List-Id General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org>
List-Unsubscribe <http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list>
List-Post <mailto:python-list@python.org>
List-Help <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe <http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe>
Newsgroups comp.lang.python
Message-ID <mailman.485.1303083918.9059.python-list@python.org> (permalink)
Lines 53
NNTP-Posting-Host 82.94.164.166
X-Trace 1303083918 news.xs4all.nl 81481 [::ffff:82.94.164.166]:60871
X-Complaints-To abuse@xs4all.nl
Xref x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.python:3437

Show key headers only | View raw


On Sun, Apr 17, 2011 at 8:38 AM, Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> wrote:
> It won't look up the *name* ‘bool’, but it will use that object. Any
> boolean expression is going to be calling the built-in ‘bool’ type
> constructor.
>
> So the answer to the OP's question is no: the function isn't equivalent
> to the type, because the OP's ‘bool_equivalent’ function necessarily
> uses the built-in ‘bool’ type, while the reverse is not true.

Actually, as I was curious myself, I've checked sources and found that
`True if x else False` will _not_ call bool(), it calls
PyObject_IsTrue() pretty much directly.
>>> import dis
>>> def bool2(x):
...     return True if x else False
...
>>> dis.dis(bool2)
  2           0 LOAD_FAST                0 (x)
              3 POP_JUMP_IF_FALSE       10
              6 LOAD_GLOBAL              0 (True)
              9 RETURN_VALUE
        >>   10 LOAD_GLOBAL              1 (False)
             13 RETURN_VALUE


        case POP_JUMP_IF_FALSE:
            w = POP();
            if (w == Py_True) {
                Py_DECREF(w);
                goto fast_next_opcode;
            }
            if (w == Py_False) {
                Py_DECREF(w);
                JUMPTO(oparg);
                goto fast_next_opcode;
            }
            err = PyObject_IsTrue(w);
            Py_DECREF(w);
            if (err > 0)
                err = 0;
            else if (err == 0)
                JUMPTO(oparg);
            else
                break;
            continue;

So technically these implementations are equivalent besides the fact
that bool() is type rather than function.

-- 
With best regards,
Daniel Kluev

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar


Thread

Equivalent code to the bool() built-in function candide <candide@free.invalid> - 2011-04-16 22:24 +0200
  Re: Equivalent code to the bool() built-in function Chris Rebert <clp2@rebertia.com> - 2011-04-16 13:58 -0700
    Re: Equivalent code to the bool() built-in function Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> - 2011-04-17 07:38 +1000
      Re: Equivalent code to the bool() built-in function candide <candide@free.invalid> - 2011-04-17 01:51 +0200
        Re: Equivalent code to the bool() built-in function Chris Rebert <clp2@rebertia.com> - 2011-04-16 17:16 -0700
        Re: Equivalent code to the bool() built-in function Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> - 2011-04-17 12:39 +1000
          Re: Equivalent code to the bool() built-in function candide <candide@free.invalid> - 2011-04-17 10:38 +0200
            Re: Equivalent code to the bool() built-in function Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2011-04-17 18:46 +1000
              Re: Equivalent code to the bool() built-in function Gregory Ewing <greg.ewing@canterbury.ac.nz> - 2011-04-18 12:12 +1200
                Re: Equivalent code to the bool() built-in function John Nagle <nagle@animats.com> - 2011-04-18 12:58 -0700
                Re: Equivalent code to the bool() built-in function Gregory Ewing <greg.ewing@canterbury.ac.nz> - 2011-04-19 12:18 +1200
                Re: Equivalent code to the bool() built-in function Christian Heimes <lists@cheimes.de> - 2011-04-19 03:39 +0200
                Re: Equivalent code to the bool() built-in function Kushal Kumaran <kushal.kumaran+python@gmail.com> - 2011-04-19 11:53 +0530
                Re: Equivalent code to the bool() built-in function Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2011-04-19 14:23 +0000
                Re: Equivalent code to the bool() built-in function Jean-Paul Calderone <calderone.jeanpaul@gmail.com> - 2011-04-19 08:43 -0700
                Re: Equivalent code to the bool() built-in function Gregory Ewing <greg.ewing@canterbury.ac.nz> - 2011-04-20 11:59 +1200
                Re: Equivalent code to the bool() built-in function Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2011-04-19 16:26 +1000
                Re: Equivalent code to the bool() built-in function Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2011-04-19 08:43 +0000
                Re: Equivalent code to the bool() built-in function Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2011-04-19 19:00 +1000
                Re: Equivalent code to the bool() built-in function Westley Martínez <anikom15@gmail.com> - 2011-04-19 06:43 -0700
            Re: Equivalent code to the bool() built-in function Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> - 2011-04-17 19:46 +1000
              Re: Equivalent code to the bool() built-in function candide <candide@free.invalid> - 2011-04-18 01:22 +0200
                Re: Equivalent code to the bool() built-in function Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> - 2011-04-18 09:46 +1000
                Re: Equivalent code to the bool() built-in function Gregory Ewing <greg.ewing@canterbury.ac.nz> - 2011-04-18 12:08 +1200
                Re: Equivalent code to the bool() built-in function Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2011-04-18 00:22 +0000
                Re: Equivalent code to the bool() built-in function Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2011-04-18 10:52 +1000
                Re: Equivalent code to the bool() built-in function Duncan Booth <duncan.booth@invalid.invalid> - 2011-04-18 10:01 +0000
            Re: Equivalent code to the bool() built-in function Daniel Kluev <dan.kluev@gmail.com> - 2011-04-17 21:11 +1100
      Re: Equivalent code to the bool() built-in function Daniel Kluev <dan.kluev@gmail.com> - 2011-04-18 10:45 +1100
        Re: Equivalent code to the bool() built-in function Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> - 2011-04-18 10:36 +1000
      Re: Re: Equivalent code to the bool() built-in function Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2011-04-18 11:52 +1000
      Re: Re: Equivalent code to the bool() built-in function Dave Angel <davea@ieee.org> - 2011-04-17 21:46 -0400
      Re: Re: Equivalent code to the bool() built-in function Daniel Kluev <dan.kluev@gmail.com> - 2011-04-18 14:16 +1100
      Re: Equivalent code to the bool() built-in function Ned Deily <nad@acm.org> - 2011-04-17 21:40 -0700
      Re: Equivalent code to the bool() built-in function Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2011-04-18 14:53 +1000
        Re: Equivalent code to the bool() built-in function Gregory Ewing <greg.ewing@canterbury.ac.nz> - 2011-04-19 12:22 +1200
      Re: Equivalent code to the bool() built-in function Chris Rebert <clp2@rebertia.com> - 2011-04-17 22:49 -0700
        Re: Equivalent code to the bool() built-in function Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2011-04-18 06:14 +0000
      Re: Equivalent code to the bool() built-in function Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2011-04-18 16:03 +1000
  Re: Equivalent code to the bool() built-in function Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> - 2011-04-17 07:13 +1000
    Re: Equivalent code to the bool() built-in function candide <candide@free.invalid> - 2011-04-17 01:51 +0200
  Re: Equivalent code to the bool() built-in function Raymond Hettinger <python@rcn.com> - 2011-04-18 01:33 -0700
    Re: Equivalent code to the bool() built-in function candide <candide@free.invalid> - 2011-04-18 11:19 +0200

csiph-web