Groups > comp.lang.python > #19110

Re: python logging filter limitation, looks intentional?

Path	csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!aioe.org!news.stack.nl!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed5.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail
Return-Path	<python-python-list@m.gmane.org>
X-Original-To	python-list@python.org
Delivered-To	python-list@mail.python.org
X-Spam-Status	OK 0.000
X-Spam-Evidence	'H': 1.00; 'S': 0.00; 'bug': 0.02; 'defaults': 0.07; 'received:verizon.net': 0.07; 'terry': 0.07; 'tests,': 0.07; 'versions.': 0.07; 'python': 0.08; 'bug,': 0.09; 'received:80.91': 0.09; 'received:80.91.229': 0.09; 'received:80.91.229.12': 0.09; 'received:gmane.org': 0.09; 'received:list': 0.09; 'received:lo.gmane.org': 0.09; 'subject:python': 0.10; ';-)': 0.12; '2.7': 0.13; 'bugs,': 0.16; 'reedy': 0.16; 'release?': 0.16; 'sajip': 0.16; 'subject:limitation': 0.16; 'subject:logging': 0.16; 'vinay': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.16; 'jan': 0.19; 'header:In- Reply-To:1': 0.22; 'code': 0.25; 'pm,': 0.26; 'fix': 0.27; 'asking': 0.27; 'seem': 0.29; 'differently': 0.30; 'chris': 0.30; 'subject:?': 0.30; 'actually': 0.32; 'does': 0.32; 'idea': 0.32; "isn't": 0.32; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.33; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.33; 'agree': 0.33; 'there': 0.33; 'header:X-Complaints-To:1': 0.34; 'but': 0.37; 'received:org': 0.37; 'another': 0.37; 'think': 0.38; 'option': 0.39; 'else': 0.39; 'subject:: ': 0.39; 'change': 0.40; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.40; 'design': 0.61; 'decision,': 0.67; 'design.': 0.73; 'policy,': 0.77; '3.3': 0.91; 'achievable': 0.91
X-Injected-Via-Gmane	http://gmane.org/
To	python-list@python.org
From	Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu>
Subject	Re: python logging filter limitation, looks intentional?
Date	Wed, 18 Jan 2012 19:50:29 -0500
References	<4F1421C3.6060806@simplistix.co.uk> <1326726505.66259.YahooMailNeo@web25803.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> <4F146EFD.8090102@simplistix.co.uk> <1326756115.24713.YahooMailNeo@web25806.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> <4F151017.6020201@simplistix.co.uk> <1326797302.16852.YahooMailNeo@web25806.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> <4F173369.9010501@simplistix.co.uk>
Mime-Version	1.0
Content-Type	text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding	7bit
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host	pool-74-109-121-73.phlapa.fios.verizon.net
User-Agent	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:8.0) Gecko/20111105 Thunderbird/8.0
In-Reply-To	<4F173369.9010501@simplistix.co.uk>
X-BeenThere	python-list@python.org
X-Mailman-Version	2.1.12
Precedence	list
List-Id	General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org>
List-Unsubscribe	<http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive	<http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list>
List-Post	<mailto:python-list@python.org>
List-Help	<mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe	<http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.python
Message-ID	<mailman.4849.1326934249.27778.python-list@python.org> (permalink)
Lines	26
NNTP-Posting-Host	2001:888:2000:d::a6
X-Trace	1326934249 news.xs4all.nl 6847 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:37103
X-Complaints-To	abuse@xs4all.nl
Xref	x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.python:19110

Show key headers only | View raw

On 1/18/2012 4:02 PM, Chris Withers wrote:
> On 17/01/2012 10:48, Vinay Sajip wrote:

> How about an option that defaults to "backwards compatibility mode" for
> Python 2.7, flipped the other way in 3.3?

2.7 only gets bug fixes, and this does not seem to be one.

>> It's not a bug, because it's like that by design. I understand that
>> you don't agree with that particular design decision, but it's out
>> there now. What you're asking for isn't unreasonable, but not
>> achievable without a change in behaviour.
>
> See above ;-)
>
>> I don't want people to have to code differently for Python 3.3 and for
>> older versions.

This is not a general policy, else we would never add new features ;-)
Do you plan to keep logging feature-frozen forever, or just for another 
release? (I actually think is a good idea to fix bugs, tests, and docs 
first.)

-- 
Terry Jan Reedy

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: python logging filter limitation, looks intentional? Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2012-01-18 19:50 -0500
  Re: python logging filter limitation, looks intentional? Vinay Sajip <vinay_sajip@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-01-20 11:17 -0800
    Re: python logging filter limitation, looks intentional? Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2012-01-20 15:09 -0500
    Re: python logging filter limitation, looks intentional? Chris Withers <chris@simplistix.co.uk> - 2012-01-28 10:51 +0000
      Re: python logging filter limitation, looks intentional? Vinay Sajip <vinay_sajip@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-01-29 02:07 -0800

csiph-web