Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #19164
| From | Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> |
|---|---|
| Subject | Re: python logging filter limitation, looks intentional? |
| Date | 2012-01-20 15:09 -0500 |
| References | (4 earlier) <4F151017.6020201@simplistix.co.uk> <1326797302.16852.YahooMailNeo@web25806.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> <4F173369.9010501@simplistix.co.uk> <mailman.4849.1326934249.27778.python-list@python.org> <3e4f47f7-ab4c-4a7e-a8ab-a280202c235a@v14g2000vbc.googlegroups.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.4893.1327090195.27778.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
On 1/20/2012 2:17 PM, Vinay Sajip wrote: > On Jan 19, 12:50 am, Terry Reedy<tjre...@udel.edu> wrote: >> >>>> I don't want people to have to code differently for Python 3.3 and for >>>> older versions. >> >> This is not a general policy, else we would never add new features ;-) >> Do you plan to keep logging feature-frozen forever, or just for another >> release? (I actually think is a good idea to fix bugs, tests, and docs >> first.) > > Logging isn't by any means feature-frozen - new features are being > added all the time, including non-trivial additions made in 2.7 and > 3.2, and some more changes planned for 3.3 and already checked in. My > comment was about the specific change proposed, which if implemented > could lead to existing working third party code failing after a Python > version upgrade. The proposed change isn't a new feature, it's a > request for an existing feature to work differently. Thank you for the clarification. I had not gotten that the request was for a change, which has a much higher bar to pass than feature additions. I was thinking of 'code differently' as in if sys.version.split()[0] >= '3.3': <use snazzy new feature> else: <use klutzy old workaround> but that is not a 'have to' as long as the workaround still works. -- Terry Jan Reedy
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: python logging filter limitation, looks intentional? Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2012-01-18 19:50 -0500
Re: python logging filter limitation, looks intentional? Vinay Sajip <vinay_sajip@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-01-20 11:17 -0800
Re: python logging filter limitation, looks intentional? Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2012-01-20 15:09 -0500
Re: python logging filter limitation, looks intentional? Chris Withers <chris@simplistix.co.uk> - 2012-01-28 10:51 +0000
Re: python logging filter limitation, looks intentional? Vinay Sajip <vinay_sajip@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-01-29 02:07 -0800
csiph-web