Groups > comp.lang.python > #19546

Re: python logging filter limitation, looks intentional?

Date	2012-01-28 10:51 +0000
From	Chris Withers <chris@simplistix.co.uk>
Subject	Re: python logging filter limitation, looks intentional?
References	(5 earlier) <1326797302.16852.YahooMailNeo@web25806.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> <4F173369.9010501@simplistix.co.uk> <mailman.4849.1326934249.27778.python-list@python.org> <3e4f47f7-ab4c-4a7e-a8ab-a280202c235a@v14g2000vbc.googlegroups.com> <jfchm4$d6m$1@dough.gmane.org>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.python
Message-ID	<mailman.5174.1327754203.27778.python-list@python.org> (permalink)

Show all headers | View raw

On 20/01/2012 20:09, Terry Reedy wrote:
>> version upgrade. The proposed change isn't a new feature, it's a
>> request for an existing feature to work differently.
>
> Thank you for the clarification. I had not gotten that the request was
> for a change, which has a much higher bar to pass than feature
> additions.

To be clear, I wasn't asking for a change to existing behaviour, I was 
asking for the addition of an option that would allow the logging 
framework to behave as most people would expect when it comes to filters ;-)

cheers,

Chris

-- 
Simplistix - Content Management, Batch Processing & Python Consulting
             - http://www.simplistix.co.uk

Thread

Re: python logging filter limitation, looks intentional? Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2012-01-18 19:50 -0500
  Re: python logging filter limitation, looks intentional? Vinay Sajip <vinay_sajip@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-01-20 11:17 -0800
    Re: python logging filter limitation, looks intentional? Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2012-01-20 15:09 -0500
    Re: python logging filter limitation, looks intentional? Chris Withers <chris@simplistix.co.uk> - 2012-01-28 10:51 +0000
      Re: python logging filter limitation, looks intentional? Vinay Sajip <vinay_sajip@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-01-29 02:07 -0800

csiph-web