Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.python > #108277

Re: pylint woes

Path csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!not-for-mail
From Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com>
Newsgroups comp.lang.python
Subject Re: pylint woes
Date Sun, 8 May 2016 03:01:17 +1000
Lines 22
Message-ID <mailman.457.1462640479.32212.python-list@python.org> (permalink)
References <ngl677$68p$1@dont-email.me> <CAPTjJmr7A+UH7Wye05_T5WV0kG=DQUrOF2Mc8-uGQ26HKAoCMg@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Trace news.uni-berlin.de 9ep95Zskz8kBsn5IRk8WDQQ2XYKgxpWOducrSoQZFIWw==
Return-Path <rosuav@gmail.com>
X-Original-To python-list@python.org
Delivered-To python-list@mail.python.org
X-Spam-Status OK 0.025
X-Spam-Evidence '*H*': 0.95; '*S*': 0.00; 'cc:addr:python-list': 0.09; 'here?': 0.09; '2016': 0.16; 'dfs': 0.16; 'from:addr:rosuav': 0.16; 'from:name:chris angelico': 0.16; 'iterating': 0.16; 'received:io': 0.16; 'received:psf.io': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.16; 'cc:2**0': 0.20; 'cc:addr:python.org': 0.20; 'am,': 0.23; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.24; 'message- id:@mail.gmail.com': 0.27; 'be:': 0.29; 'code': 0.30; 'says': 0.32; '[1]': 0.32; 'possibly': 0.32; 'received:google.com': 0.35; 'something': 0.35; 'instead': 0.36; 'there': 0.36; 'received:209.85': 0.36; 'subject:: ': 0.37; 'suggestion': 0.37; 'received:209': 0.38; 'data': 0.39; 'your': 0.60; 'chrisa': 0.84; 'enumeration': 0.84; 'to:none': 0.91
DKIM-Signature v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:cc; bh=8fdZnPbBApON8FH9YeZXArEm8tcf7Y3btX5sbH9LGJU=; b=PlVr6X6vh9tNY7WiBORHad2LRGEx/g9HrTcRPl0WNnueuRoZ2yWJyhUSqaMInWEl/N ArFtbSmJInz8lvL0wr5I/toP0MSwVsARCbrSzuG+zvDVnGj9uC0d8z4aNHwgXoFPC+Ei DfQw3iPWbZSLn97RJFdN6el3MUT7GqZ+lRk8VDC/n8AbfWxwpJxGHFO0/Jqw4szXqQPc 4g5ZSwBO8rU0HZD34l0vMdFgs+0slS0zNNMuMSqZv+R1kXPlpCcJ58eHs93g2eP6rmS+ QtP9AQYwBAaGJvy5Oi0k5RGBelREZeOTnV2MXD+1zjXpjkFccNbIrwWwlAnoYVjoj5E6 LjwQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:cc; bh=8fdZnPbBApON8FH9YeZXArEm8tcf7Y3btX5sbH9LGJU=; b=XONEPmM/V8XUQkBXuD/2kWnl1FdQXmdH8A7UKWOeA+oimEh5CsH1I++6wjcYRBCmiX bWG+lQTi1yKPvWzJ4z5jODni9KpgIKwq+9XyFtKuafVQrR1GBLTYP8WEPXV80iMWo8Eb 4bt8RAnHIqgAB77U0KPekmQBykOzSZTVk4nYURHDQvhSA4TfgNcXsWWp+8gD95PPTcTw SV5O8rXRp6C6Pohu6VV5hIYDd62yJUr8ENfbnTG5dD7Fm36Y/gDfUlKIchJl6avpbqoS wsuCcHHUrtJnrx2bU5qs2kwbpp4su4wTXFWd82i/zf4w0L4+8WnrOti54bx+0+JWjw2c P/Yg==
X-Gm-Message-State AOPr4FWBrZASjQhVrcLY2g2OS4zQ3M3J7e3cjn51pU6y0ub2ch8A0iX5hBZ6P6UD0t9arSwyqGYMtz56qta+XQ==
X-Received by 10.112.189.1 with SMTP id ge1mr11674903lbc.9.1462640477663; Sat, 07 May 2016 10:01:17 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To <ngl677$68p$1@dont-email.me>
X-BeenThere python-list@python.org
X-Mailman-Version 2.1.22
Precedence list
List-Id General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org>
List-Unsubscribe <https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/>
List-Post <mailto:python-list@python.org>
List-Help <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe <https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe>
X-Mailman-Original-Message-ID <CAPTjJmr7A+UH7Wye05_T5WV0kG=DQUrOF2Mc8-uGQ26HKAoCMg@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailman-Original-References <ngl677$68p$1@dont-email.me>
Xref csiph.com comp.lang.python:108277

Show key headers only | View raw

On Sun, May 8, 2016 at 2:51 AM, DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote:
> [1]
> pylint says "Consider using enumerate instead of iterating with range and
> len"
>
> the offending code is:
> for j in range(len(list1)):
>   do something with list1[j], list2[j], list3[j], etc.
>
> enumeration would be:
> for j,item in enumerate(list1):
>   do something with list1[j], list2[j], list3[j], etc.
>
> Is there an advantage to using enumerate() here?

The suggestion from a human would be to use zip(), or possibly to
change your data structures.

for item1, item2, item3 in zip(list1, list2, list3):
    do something with the items

ChrisA

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

pylint woes DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-05-07 12:51 -0400
  Re: pylint woes Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2016-05-08 03:01 +1000
    Re: pylint woes DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-05-07 21:16 -0400
      Re: pylint woes Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2016-05-08 11:36 +1000
        Re: pylint woes DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-05-07 22:15 -0400
          Re: pylint woes Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2016-05-08 12:50 +1000
            Re: pylint woes DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-05-10 18:36 -0400
              Re: pylint woes MRAB <python@mrabarnett.plus.com> - 2016-05-11 02:02 +0100
      Re: pylint woes Stephen Hansen <me+python@ixokai.io> - 2016-05-07 19:14 -0700
        Re: pylint woes DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-05-07 23:04 -0400
          Re: pylint woes Stephen Hansen <me+python@ixokai.io> - 2016-05-07 20:46 -0700
            Re: pylint woes DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-05-08 10:26 -0400
          Re: pylint woes Jussi Piitulainen <jussi.piitulainen@helsinki.fi> - 2016-05-08 08:50 +0300
            Re: pylint woes DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-05-08 10:25 -0400
              Re: pylint woes Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2016-05-09 00:36 +1000
                Re: pylint woes DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-05-08 11:06 -0400
                Re: pylint woes Stephen Hansen <me+python@ixokai.io> - 2016-05-08 08:15 -0700
                Re: pylint woes Gregory Ewing <greg.ewing@canterbury.ac.nz> - 2016-05-09 13:17 +1200
                Re: pylint woes Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2016-05-09 12:18 +1000
                Re: pylint woes DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-05-08 22:58 -0400
                Re: pylint woes Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2016-05-09 01:15 +1000
                Re: pylint woes DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-05-08 17:06 -0400
              Re: pylint woes Stephen Hansen <me+python@ixokai.io> - 2016-05-08 08:11 -0700
              Re: pylint woes Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> - 2016-05-09 01:51 +1000
                Re: pylint woes DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-05-08 17:04 -0400
                Re: pylint woes Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> - 2016-05-09 13:09 +1000
      Re: pylint woes MRAB <python@mrabarnett.plus.com> - 2016-05-08 03:21 +0100
      Re: pylint woes Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> - 2016-05-08 21:36 +1000
        Re: pylint woes DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-05-08 17:24 -0400
          Re: pylint woes Joel Goldstick <joel.goldstick@gmail.com> - 2016-05-08 17:39 -0400
          Re: pylint woes Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> - 2016-05-09 13:46 +1000
  Re: pylint woes Michael Selik <michael.selik@gmail.com> - 2016-05-07 18:42 +0000
  Re: pylint woes Peter Pearson <pkpearson@nowhere.invalid> - 2016-05-07 18:43 +0000
    Re: pylint woes DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-05-08 17:05 -0400
  Re: pylint woes Christopher Reimer <christopher_reimer@icloud.com> - 2016-05-07 11:52 -0700
    Re: pylint woes DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-05-07 23:38 -0400
      Re: pylint woes Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2016-05-08 13:56 +1000
      Re: pylint woes Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> - 2016-05-08 16:19 +0200
  Re: pylint woes Stephen Hansen <me+python@ixokai.io> - 2016-05-07 12:21 -0700
  Re: pylint woes Stephen Hansen <me@ixokai.io> - 2016-05-07 12:23 -0700
  Re: pylint woes Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2016-05-07 15:40 -0400
    Re: pylint woes DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-05-07 23:28 -0400
      Re: pylint woes Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2016-05-08 13:51 +1000
        Re: pylint woes DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-05-08 00:40 -0400
          Re: pylint woes Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2016-05-08 14:55 +1000
      Re: pylint woes Stephen Hansen <me+python@ixokai.io> - 2016-05-07 20:55 -0700
      Re: pylint woes Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2016-05-07 23:09 -0600
      Re: pylint woes Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> - 2016-05-08 16:12 +0200
  Re: pylint woes Christopher Reimer <christopher_reimer@icloud.com> - 2016-05-07 12:43 -0700
  Re: pylint woes Ray Cote <rgacote@appropriatesolutions.com> - 2016-05-07 15:52 -0400
  Re: pylint woes Christopher Reimer <christopher_reimer@icloud.com> - 2016-05-07 13:20 -0700
  Re: pylint woes Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2016-05-08 07:56 +1000
  Re: pylint woes Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2016-05-07 21:44 -0400
  Re: pylint woes Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> - 2016-05-08 13:25 +1000
    Re: pylint woes DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-05-08 00:10 -0400
      Re: pylint woes Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2016-05-08 14:21 +1000
      Re: pylint woes "D'Arcy J.M. Cain" <darcy@VybeNetworks.com> - 2016-05-08 08:50 -0400
      Re: pylint woes Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2016-05-08 23:01 +1000
        Re: pylint woes Larry Hudson <orgnut@yahoo.com> - 2016-05-08 13:45 -0700
          Re: pylint woes Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2016-05-09 08:07 +1000
            Re: pylint woes Larry Hudson <orgnut@yahoo.com> - 2016-05-08 18:28 -0700
        Re: pylint woes Dan Sommers <dan@tombstonezero.net> - 2016-05-08 20:49 +0000
          Re: pylint woes Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2016-05-09 08:10 +1000
      Re: pylint woes Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> - 2016-05-09 03:25 +1000
        Re: pylint woes DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-05-08 17:16 -0400
          Re: pylint woes Stephen Hansen <me+python@ixokai.io> - 2016-05-08 14:38 -0700
            Re: pylint woes DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-05-08 17:46 -0400
              Re: pylint woes Stephen Hansen <me+python@ixokai.io> - 2016-05-08 15:05 -0700
                Re: pylint woes DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-05-08 18:24 -0400

csiph-web