Path: csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!not-for-mail From: Chris Angelico Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Subject: Re: pylint woes Date: Sun, 8 May 2016 03:01:17 +1000 Lines: 22 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Trace: news.uni-berlin.de 9ep95Zskz8kBsn5IRk8WDQQ2XYKgxpWOducrSoQZFIWw== Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.025 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.95; '*S*': 0.00; 'cc:addr:python-list': 0.09; 'here?': 0.09; '2016': 0.16; 'dfs': 0.16; 'from:addr:rosuav': 0.16; 'from:name:chris angelico': 0.16; 'iterating': 0.16; 'received:io': 0.16; 'received:psf.io': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.16; 'cc:2**0': 0.20; 'cc:addr:python.org': 0.20; 'am,': 0.23; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.24; 'message- id:@mail.gmail.com': 0.27; 'be:': 0.29; 'code': 0.30; 'says': 0.32; '[1]': 0.32; 'possibly': 0.32; 'received:google.com': 0.35; 'something': 0.35; 'instead': 0.36; 'there': 0.36; 'received:209.85': 0.36; 'subject:: ': 0.37; 'suggestion': 0.37; 'received:209': 0.38; 'data': 0.39; 'your': 0.60; 'chrisa': 0.84; 'enumeration': 0.84; 'to:none': 0.91 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:cc; bh=8fdZnPbBApON8FH9YeZXArEm8tcf7Y3btX5sbH9LGJU=; b=PlVr6X6vh9tNY7WiBORHad2LRGEx/g9HrTcRPl0WNnueuRoZ2yWJyhUSqaMInWEl/N ArFtbSmJInz8lvL0wr5I/toP0MSwVsARCbrSzuG+zvDVnGj9uC0d8z4aNHwgXoFPC+Ei DfQw3iPWbZSLn97RJFdN6el3MUT7GqZ+lRk8VDC/n8AbfWxwpJxGHFO0/Jqw4szXqQPc 4g5ZSwBO8rU0HZD34l0vMdFgs+0slS0zNNMuMSqZv+R1kXPlpCcJ58eHs93g2eP6rmS+ QtP9AQYwBAaGJvy5Oi0k5RGBelREZeOTnV2MXD+1zjXpjkFccNbIrwWwlAnoYVjoj5E6 LjwQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:cc; bh=8fdZnPbBApON8FH9YeZXArEm8tcf7Y3btX5sbH9LGJU=; b=XONEPmM/V8XUQkBXuD/2kWnl1FdQXmdH8A7UKWOeA+oimEh5CsH1I++6wjcYRBCmiX bWG+lQTi1yKPvWzJ4z5jODni9KpgIKwq+9XyFtKuafVQrR1GBLTYP8WEPXV80iMWo8Eb 4bt8RAnHIqgAB77U0KPekmQBykOzSZTVk4nYURHDQvhSA4TfgNcXsWWp+8gD95PPTcTw SV5O8rXRp6C6Pohu6VV5hIYDd62yJUr8ENfbnTG5dD7Fm36Y/gDfUlKIchJl6avpbqoS wsuCcHHUrtJnrx2bU5qs2kwbpp4su4wTXFWd82i/zf4w0L4+8WnrOti54bx+0+JWjw2c P/Yg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FWBrZASjQhVrcLY2g2OS4zQ3M3J7e3cjn51pU6y0ub2ch8A0iX5hBZ6P6UD0t9arSwyqGYMtz56qta+XQ== X-Received: by 10.112.189.1 with SMTP id ge1mr11674903lbc.9.1462640477663; Sat, 07 May 2016 10:01:17 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-Mailman-Original-Message-ID: X-Mailman-Original-References: Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:108277 On Sun, May 8, 2016 at 2:51 AM, DFS wrote: > [1] > pylint says "Consider using enumerate instead of iterating with range and > len" > > the offending code is: > for j in range(len(list1)): > do something with list1[j], list2[j], list3[j], etc. > > enumeration would be: > for j,item in enumerate(list1): > do something with list1[j], list2[j], list3[j], etc. > > Is there an advantage to using enumerate() here? The suggestion from a human would be to use zip(), or possibly to change your data structures. for item1, item2, item3 in zip(list1, list2, list3): do something with the items ChrisA