Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.python > #3381

Re: Equivalent code to the bool() built-in function

Path csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!aioe.org!feeder.news-service.com!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed6.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail
Return-Path <rosuav@gmail.com>
X-Original-To python-list@python.org
Delivered-To python-list@mail.python.org
X-Spam-Status OK 0.041
X-Spam-Evidence '*H*': 0.92; '*S*': 0.00; 'bool': 0.09; 'integers': 0.09; 'sun,': 0.09; 'pm,': 0.11; 'wrote:': 0.14; 'certainly.': 0.16; 'str()': 0.16; 'subject:() ': 0.16; 'subject:function': 0.16; "hasn't": 0.19; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.22; 'received:209.85.214.174': 0.23; 'received:mail- iw0-f174.google.com': 0.23; 'subject:code': 0.23; 'compare': 0.26; 'essential': 0.26; 'chris': 0.27; 'message-id:@mail.gmail.com': 0.28; 'implement': 0.30; '17,': 0.31; 'types.': 0.31; 'it.': 0.31; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.32; 'done': 0.32; 'explicit': 0.35; 'quite': 0.36; 'some': 0.37; 'received:209.85': 0.37; 'apr': 0.38; 'strings': 0.38; 'received:google.com': 0.38; 'but': 0.38; 'no.': 0.38; 'received:209.85.214': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'received:209': 0.39; 'how': 0.39; 'header:Received:5': 0.40; '2011': 0.62; 'advantages': 0.77; 'candide': 0.84; 'decades,': 0.84; 'manages': 0.84; 'killed': 0.91
DKIM-Signature v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=K5UMXZdlOoMp0Uq0EWpU72amnn1CzGHduilTARb4cmU=; b=i5iSfVGf04i4jwBDo++dDb9j1ZqiV2wCbfJKG4ZMcIdxt/DH5YedX78q+554A55mJt CgYwQatJSp8jUNFEvbD9OlSkJXV+LmZ5hjxd88HzXWaRXAmGd6YPYvloT2ZmzaOfcKl9 fPbg4BqZ4crmTotsWYNs/VOcb3mAP6ExbHMd4=
DomainKey-Signature a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=gRntwkmkSypMuJ3qoD0PGns8V02K/5BJ9HR9QQBGSWXIbv2bnHaeqqbM6gYnc1BG/d uP6YvCf8Ja4fIa2KpZtIhsYStBnUg8f4rI6gjiG8rX8zCxdjV5H27ArEs4PlS0ibarQV wZAutP2N52V641VVish1xTRIHGnVGQIbMVlIM=
MIME-Version 1.0
In-Reply-To <4daaa6f6$0$20187$426a74cc@news.free.fr>
References <4da9fb0b$0$13696$426a74cc@news.free.fr> <mailman.442.1302987518.9059.python-list@python.org> <87k4etho6e.fsf@benfinney.id.au> <4daa2b72$0$32037$426a74cc@news.free.fr> <87d3klha85.fsf@benfinney.id.au> <4daaa6f6$0$20187$426a74cc@news.free.fr>
Date Sun, 17 Apr 2011 18:46:22 +1000
Subject Re: Equivalent code to the bool() built-in function
From Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com>
To python-list@python.org
Content-Type text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-BeenThere python-list@python.org
X-Mailman-Version 2.1.12
Precedence list
List-Id General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org>
List-Unsubscribe <http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list>
List-Post <mailto:python-list@python.org>
List-Help <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe <http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe>
Newsgroups comp.lang.python
Message-ID <mailman.453.1303029985.9059.python-list@python.org> (permalink)
Lines 11
NNTP-Posting-Host 82.94.164.166
X-Trace 1303029985 news.xs4all.nl 41103 [::ffff:82.94.164.166]:35263
X-Complaints-To abuse@xs4all.nl
Xref x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.python:3381

Show key headers only | View raw

On Sun, Apr 17, 2011 at 6:38 PM, candide <candide@free.invalid> wrote:
> I also try to consider how essential the bool() type is.
> Again compare with int() or str() types.

Well, of course you can always implement bool as an int; C has done
this for decades, and it hasn't killed it. You can also implement
integers as strings - REXX manages quite well, and gets some
advantages therefrom. But having an explicit bool type has its
benefits too. Essential? No. Useful? Certainly.

Chris Angelico

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Equivalent code to the bool() built-in function candide <candide@free.invalid> - 2011-04-16 22:24 +0200
  Re: Equivalent code to the bool() built-in function Chris Rebert <clp2@rebertia.com> - 2011-04-16 13:58 -0700
    Re: Equivalent code to the bool() built-in function Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> - 2011-04-17 07:38 +1000
      Re: Equivalent code to the bool() built-in function candide <candide@free.invalid> - 2011-04-17 01:51 +0200
        Re: Equivalent code to the bool() built-in function Chris Rebert <clp2@rebertia.com> - 2011-04-16 17:16 -0700
        Re: Equivalent code to the bool() built-in function Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> - 2011-04-17 12:39 +1000
          Re: Equivalent code to the bool() built-in function candide <candide@free.invalid> - 2011-04-17 10:38 +0200
            Re: Equivalent code to the bool() built-in function Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2011-04-17 18:46 +1000
              Re: Equivalent code to the bool() built-in function Gregory Ewing <greg.ewing@canterbury.ac.nz> - 2011-04-18 12:12 +1200
                Re: Equivalent code to the bool() built-in function John Nagle <nagle@animats.com> - 2011-04-18 12:58 -0700
                Re: Equivalent code to the bool() built-in function Gregory Ewing <greg.ewing@canterbury.ac.nz> - 2011-04-19 12:18 +1200
                Re: Equivalent code to the bool() built-in function Christian Heimes <lists@cheimes.de> - 2011-04-19 03:39 +0200
                Re: Equivalent code to the bool() built-in function Kushal Kumaran <kushal.kumaran+python@gmail.com> - 2011-04-19 11:53 +0530
                Re: Equivalent code to the bool() built-in function Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2011-04-19 14:23 +0000
                Re: Equivalent code to the bool() built-in function Jean-Paul Calderone <calderone.jeanpaul@gmail.com> - 2011-04-19 08:43 -0700
                Re: Equivalent code to the bool() built-in function Gregory Ewing <greg.ewing@canterbury.ac.nz> - 2011-04-20 11:59 +1200
                Re: Equivalent code to the bool() built-in function Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2011-04-19 16:26 +1000
                Re: Equivalent code to the bool() built-in function Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2011-04-19 08:43 +0000
                Re: Equivalent code to the bool() built-in function Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2011-04-19 19:00 +1000
                Re: Equivalent code to the bool() built-in function Westley Martínez <anikom15@gmail.com> - 2011-04-19 06:43 -0700
            Re: Equivalent code to the bool() built-in function Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> - 2011-04-17 19:46 +1000
              Re: Equivalent code to the bool() built-in function candide <candide@free.invalid> - 2011-04-18 01:22 +0200
                Re: Equivalent code to the bool() built-in function Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> - 2011-04-18 09:46 +1000
                Re: Equivalent code to the bool() built-in function Gregory Ewing <greg.ewing@canterbury.ac.nz> - 2011-04-18 12:08 +1200
                Re: Equivalent code to the bool() built-in function Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2011-04-18 00:22 +0000
                Re: Equivalent code to the bool() built-in function Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2011-04-18 10:52 +1000
                Re: Equivalent code to the bool() built-in function Duncan Booth <duncan.booth@invalid.invalid> - 2011-04-18 10:01 +0000
            Re: Equivalent code to the bool() built-in function Daniel Kluev <dan.kluev@gmail.com> - 2011-04-17 21:11 +1100
      Re: Equivalent code to the bool() built-in function Daniel Kluev <dan.kluev@gmail.com> - 2011-04-18 10:45 +1100
        Re: Equivalent code to the bool() built-in function Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> - 2011-04-18 10:36 +1000
      Re: Re: Equivalent code to the bool() built-in function Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2011-04-18 11:52 +1000
      Re: Re: Equivalent code to the bool() built-in function Dave Angel <davea@ieee.org> - 2011-04-17 21:46 -0400
      Re: Re: Equivalent code to the bool() built-in function Daniel Kluev <dan.kluev@gmail.com> - 2011-04-18 14:16 +1100
      Re: Equivalent code to the bool() built-in function Ned Deily <nad@acm.org> - 2011-04-17 21:40 -0700
      Re: Equivalent code to the bool() built-in function Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2011-04-18 14:53 +1000
        Re: Equivalent code to the bool() built-in function Gregory Ewing <greg.ewing@canterbury.ac.nz> - 2011-04-19 12:22 +1200
      Re: Equivalent code to the bool() built-in function Chris Rebert <clp2@rebertia.com> - 2011-04-17 22:49 -0700
        Re: Equivalent code to the bool() built-in function Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2011-04-18 06:14 +0000
      Re: Equivalent code to the bool() built-in function Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2011-04-18 16:03 +1000
  Re: Equivalent code to the bool() built-in function Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> - 2011-04-17 07:13 +1000
    Re: Equivalent code to the bool() built-in function candide <candide@free.invalid> - 2011-04-17 01:51 +0200
  Re: Equivalent code to the bool() built-in function Raymond Hettinger <python@rcn.com> - 2011-04-18 01:33 -0700
    Re: Equivalent code to the bool() built-in function candide <candide@free.invalid> - 2011-04-18 11:19 +0200

csiph-web