Re: Spamming PyPI with stupid packages

Path	csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!news.albasani.net!feeder.erje.net!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed5.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail
Return-Path	<ethan@stoneleaf.us>
X-Original-To	python-list@python.org
Delivered-To	python-list@mail.python.org
X-Spam-Status	OK 0.045
X-Spam-Evidence	'H': 0.91; 'S': 0.00; 'from:addr:ethan': 0.09; 'from:addr:stoneleaf.us': 0.09; 'from:name:ethan furman': 0.09; 'message-id:@stoneleaf.us': 0.09; 'prejudice': 0.09; 'received:gator410.hostgator.com': 0.09; 'sure)': 0.09; '~ethan~': 0.09; 'defending': 0.16; 'fellows': 0.16; 'finney': 0.16; 'low- level': 0.16; 'subject:PyPI': 0.16; 'white,': 0.16; 'worse,': 0.16; 'cc:addr:python-list': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; 'cc:no real name:20': 0.20; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.22; 'cc:20': 0.24; "i'm": 0.26; '(and': 0.28; 'cc:addr:python.org': 0.29; 'environment.': 0.30; 'harm': 0.30; 'privileges': 0.30; 'idea': 0.32; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.33; 'there': 0.33; 'done': 0.34; 'see,': 0.34; 'ourselves': 0.35; 'subject:with': 0.36; 'received:76': 0.37; 'think': 0.37; 'despite': 0.38; 'being': 0.39; "it's": 0.40; 'hope': 0.61; 'more': 0.61; 'effective': 0.61; 'house': 0.61; 'our': 0.64; 'received:websitewelcome.com': 0.64; 'act': 0.65; 'making': 0.67; 'received:184': 0.67; 'woman': 0.84; 'atmosphere': 0.84; 'received:67.18.68': 0.84; 'received:gateway15.websitewelcome.com': 0.84; 'hostile': 0.91; 'luxury': 0.91; 'pervasive': 0.91; 'joke,': 0.93
Date	Tue, 03 Jan 2012 19:34:28 -0800
From	Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us>
User-Agent	Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (Windows/20100228)
MIME-Version	1.0
To	Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au>
Subject	Re: Spamming PyPI with stupid packages
References	<CAGjo3NNsRVHd-P87qjn30VZX7mmAxgE4UVefEOo_jpFL3TNPew@mail.gmail.com> <mailman.4310.1325506835.27778.python-list@python.org> <87hb0d28j8.fsf@benfinney.id.au> <mailman.4318.1325537848.27778.python-list@python.org> <87aa6522au.fsf@benfinney.id.au> <4f02ba8d$0$29880$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <8762gs1mag.fsf@benfinney.id.au> <4f03ad75$0$11122$c3e8da3@news.astraweb.com> <878vloz0zi.fsf@benfinney.id.au> <4f03b3b6$0$11122$c3e8da3@news.astraweb.com> <87pqf0b33c.fsf@benfinney.id.au>
In-Reply-To	<87pqf0b33c.fsf@benfinney.id.au>
Content-Type	text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding	7bit
X-AntiAbuse	This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse	Primary Hostname - gator410.hostgator.com
X-AntiAbuse	Original Domain - python.org
X-AntiAbuse	Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse	Sender Address Domain - stoneleaf.us
X-BWhitelist	no
X-Source
X-Source-Args
X-Source-Dir
X-Source-Sender	c-76-105-214-227.hsd1.or.comcast.net ([192.168.74.5]) [76.105.214.227]:2124
X-Source-Auth	ethan+stoneleaf.us
X-Email-Count	1
X-Source-Cap	dG9idWs7dG9idWs7Z2F0b3I0MTAuaG9zdGdhdG9yLmNvbQ==
Cc	python-list@python.org
X-BeenThere	python-list@python.org
X-Mailman-Version	2.1.12
Precedence	list
List-Id	General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org>
List-Unsubscribe	<http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive	<http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list>
List-Post	<mailto:python-list@python.org>
List-Help	<mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe	<http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.python
Message-ID	<mailman.4401.1325651673.27778.python-list@python.org> (permalink)
Lines	24
NNTP-Posting-Host	2001:888:2000:d::a6
X-Trace	1325651673 news.xs4all.nl 6858 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:43235
X-Complaints-To	abuse@xs4all.nl
Xref	x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.python:18488

Show key headers only | View raw

Ben Finney wrote:
> I have no idea what it would take to persuade you in particular. I do
> know that the combined privileges of being white, male, not-poor, and
> English-fluent (and many more privileges, I'm sure) grant both of us the
> luxury of barely even perceiving the harm done by a pervasive atmosphere
> of even low-level prejudice against any given group of people.


> We have very effective cognitive blinders, merely because we have never
> needed to know what it's like being a woman in this prevalently-male
> field. The onus is on us to try hard to see, despite those blinders and
> easy rationalisations, that there is a lot we allow from our fellows
> which is perpetuating a hostile environment.


> I'm not making a fuss about one sexist joke, which has already been
> retracted by its author. I'm making a fuss about allowing and, worse,
> defending such jokes as a tacitly-accepted norm of our community. And I
> hope those of us who prefer to think of ourselves as not-sexist will act
> to clean up our house more.

+1

~Ethan~

Thread

Re: Spamming PyPI with stupid packages Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> - 2012-01-02 13:20 +0100
  Re: Spamming PyPI with stupid packages Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> - 2012-01-03 06:45 +1100
    Re: Spamming PyPI with stupid packages Devin Jeanpierre <jeanpierreda@gmail.com> - 2012-01-02 15:56 -0500
      Re: Spamming PyPI with stupid packages Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> - 2012-01-03 08:59 +1100
        Re: Spamming PyPI with stupid packages Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2012-01-03 08:21 +0000
          Re: Spamming PyPI with stupid packages Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> - 2012-01-04 08:57 +1100
            Re: Spamming PyPI with stupid packages Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2012-01-04 01:37 +0000
              Re: Spamming PyPI with stupid packages Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> - 2012-01-04 12:54 +1100
                Re: Spamming PyPI with stupid packages Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2012-01-04 02:04 +0000
                Re: Spamming PyPI with stupid packages Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> - 2012-01-04 13:42 +1100
                Re: Spamming PyPI with stupid packages Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> - 2012-01-03 19:34 -0800
                Re: Spamming PyPI with stupid packages Rami Chowdhury <rami.chowdhury@gmail.com> - 2012-01-04 12:49 +0000
                Re: Spamming PyPI with stupid packages Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2012-01-04 11:39 -0700
                Re: Spamming PyPI with stupid packages Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2012-01-04 12:28 -0700
                Re: Spamming PyPI with stupid packages Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2012-01-04 13:08 -0700
                Re: Spamming PyPI with stupid packages Arnaud Delobelle <arnodel@gmail.com> - 2012-01-04 20:51 +0000
                Re: Spamming PyPI with stupid packages Rick Johnson <rantingrickjohnson@gmail.com> - 2012-01-05 21:26 -0800
                Re: Spamming PyPI with stupid packages Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2012-01-04 13:37 +1100
                Re: Spamming PyPI with stupid packages Rick Johnson <rantingrickjohnson@gmail.com> - 2012-01-05 21:22 -0800
                Re: Spamming PyPI with stupid packages Dan Sommers <dan@tombstonezero.net> - 2012-01-04 03:06 +0000
                Re: Spamming PyPI with stupid packages Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2012-01-04 14:31 +1100
        Re: Spamming PyPI with stupid packages Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> - 2012-01-03 09:47 +0100
          Re: Spamming PyPI with stupid packages Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> - 2012-01-04 09:11 +1100
    Re: Spamming PyPI with stupid packages Robert Kern <robert.kern@gmail.com> - 2012-01-02 22:43 +0000
    Re: Spamming PyPI with stupid packages Devin Jeanpierre <jeanpierreda@gmail.com> - 2012-01-02 19:10 -0500

csiph-web