Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.python > #61758

Re: [newbie] trying socket as a replacement for nc

References <efae1b3c-c9c5-4ef4-8e94-7fbe8716ab53@googlegroups.com> <mailman.3939.1386804043.18130.python-list@python.org> <l8cggd$fl9$1@reader1.panix.com>
Date 2013-12-12 13:27 -0800
Subject Re: [newbie] trying socket as a replacement for nc
From Dan Stromberg <drsalists@gmail.com>
Newsgroups comp.lang.python
Message-ID <mailman.4027.1386883640.18130.python-list@python.org> (permalink)

Show all headers | View raw

On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 6:16 AM, Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> wrote:

>> Sockets reserve the right to split one socket.send() into multiple
>> socket.recv()'s on the other end of the communication, or to aggregate
>> multiple socket.send()'s into a single socket.recv() - pretty much any way
>> the relevant IP stacks and communications equipment feel like for the sake
>> of performance or reliability.
>
> Just to be pedantic: _TCP_ sockets reserver that right.  UDP sockets
> do not, and do in fact guarantee that each message is discrete.  [It
> appears that the OP is undoubtedly using TCP sockets.]

I haven't done a lot of UDP, but are you pretty sure UDP can't at
least fragment large packets?  What's a router or switch to do if the
Path MTU isn't large enough for an original packet?

http://www.gamedev.net/topic/343577-fragmented-udp-packets/

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

[newbie] trying socket as a replacement for nc Jean Dubois <jeandubois314@gmail.com> - 2013-12-11 15:08 -0800
  Re: [newbie] trying socket as a replacement for nc Dan Stromberg <drsalists@gmail.com> - 2013-12-11 15:20 -0800
    Re: [newbie] trying socket as a replacement for nc Jean Dubois <jeandubois314@gmail.com> - 2013-12-12 00:28 -0800
      Re: [newbie] trying socket as a replacement for nc Dan Stromberg <drsalists@gmail.com> - 2013-12-12 13:23 -0800
        Re: [newbie] trying socket as a replacement for nc Jean Dubois <jeandubois314@gmail.com> - 2013-12-12 19:23 -0800
          Re: [newbie] trying socket as a replacement for nc Dan Stromberg <drsalists@gmail.com> - 2013-12-12 19:32 -0800
            Re: [newbie] trying socket as a replacement for nc Jean Dubois <jeandubois314@gmail.com> - 2013-12-13 03:03 -0800
            Re: [newbie] trying socket as a replacement for nc Jean Dubois <jeandubois314@gmail.com> - 2013-12-13 03:56 -0800
          Re: [newbie] trying socket as a replacement for nc Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2013-12-13 08:35 +0000
            Re: [newbie] trying socket as a replacement for nc Jean Dubois <jeandubois314@gmail.com> - 2013-12-13 04:20 -0800
              Re: [newbie] trying socket as a replacement for nc rusi <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2013-12-13 09:04 -0800
              Re: [newbie] trying socket as a replacement for nc rusi <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2013-12-13 09:09 -0800
                Re: [newbie] trying socket as a replacement for nc Jean Dubois <jeandubois314@gmail.com> - 2013-12-14 05:11 -0800
            Re: [newbie] trying socket as a replacement for nc Jean Dubois <jeandubois314@gmail.com> - 2013-12-14 05:14 -0800
              Re: [newbie] trying socket as a replacement for nc Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2013-12-14 13:29 +0000
        Re: [newbie] trying socket as a replacement for nc Jean Dubois <jeandubois314@gmail.com> - 2013-12-16 01:40 -0800
          Re: [newbie] trying socket as a replacement for nc Ervin Hegedüs <airween@gmail.com> - 2013-12-16 11:04 +0100
    Re: [newbie] trying socket as a replacement for nc Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2013-12-12 14:16 +0000
      Re: [newbie] trying socket as a replacement for nc Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-12-13 01:23 +1100
      Re: [newbie] trying socket as a replacement for nc Dan Stromberg <drsalists@gmail.com> - 2013-12-12 13:27 -0800
        Re: [newbie] trying socket as a replacement for nc Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2013-12-13 16:06 +0000
          Re: [newbie] trying socket as a replacement for nc Dan Stromberg <drsalists@gmail.com> - 2013-12-14 17:24 -0800
            Re: [newbie] trying socket as a replacement for nc Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2013-12-15 15:15 +0000
              Re: [newbie] trying socket as a replacement for nc Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2013-12-15 10:51 -0500
                Re: [newbie] trying socket as a replacement for nc Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-12-16 03:04 +1100
                Re: [newbie] trying socket as a replacement for nc Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2013-12-15 12:44 -0500
                Re: [newbie] trying socket as a replacement for nc Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2013-12-15 22:42 +0000
                Re: [newbie] trying socket as a replacement for nc Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-12-16 09:48 +1100
      Re: [newbie] trying socket as a replacement for nc Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-12-13 08:58 +1100
        Re: [newbie] trying socket as a replacement for nc Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2013-12-13 16:10 +0000
          Re: [newbie] trying socket as a replacement for nc Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-12-14 03:19 +1100
            Re: [newbie] trying socket as a replacement for nc Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2013-12-13 16:57 +0000
              Re: [newbie] trying socket as a replacement for nc Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-12-14 04:05 +1100
        Re: [newbie] trying socket as a replacement for nc 88888 Dihedral <dihedral88888@gmail.com> - 2013-12-16 04:38 -0800
          Re: [newbie] trying socket as a replacement for nc Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-12-16 23:59 +1100
          Re: [newbie] trying socket as a replacement for nc Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2013-12-16 09:03 -0500
            Re: [newbie] trying socket as a replacement for nc 88888 Dihedral <dihedral88888@gmail.com> - 2013-12-18 23:20 -0800
      Re: [newbie] trying socket as a replacement for nc Dave Angel <davea@davea.name> - 2013-12-12 19:52 -0500
  Re: [newbie] trying socket as a replacement for nc Conor Hughes <conorh@conorh.net> - 2013-12-11 15:38 -0800
    Re: [newbie] trying socket as a replacement for nc Jean Dubois <jeandubois314@gmail.com> - 2013-12-12 00:08 -0800
      Re: [newbie] trying socket as a replacement for nc Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-12-12 19:21 +1100
        Re: [newbie] trying socket as a replacement for nc Jean Dubois <jeandubois314@gmail.com> - 2013-12-12 01:21 -0800
          Re: [newbie] trying socket as a replacement for nc Alister <alister.ware@ntlworld.com> - 2013-12-12 14:05 +0000
          Re: [newbie] trying socket as a replacement for nc Alister <alister.ware@ntlworld.com> - 2013-12-12 14:05 +0000
            Re: [newbie] trying socket as a replacement for nc Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2013-12-12 14:34 +0000
  Re: [newbie] trying socket as a replacement for nc Christian Gollwitzer <auriocus@gmx.de> - 2013-12-13 00:43 +0100

csiph-web