Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.python > #36574

Re: Why BOM in logging message?

References <kcksg2$bkp$1@panix2.panix.com> <mailman.344.1357772847.2939.python-list@python.org> <roy-10B053.20174309012013@news.panix.com> <kcmoug$rk4$1@panix2.panix.com>
Date 2013-01-11 03:16 +1100
Subject Re: Why BOM in logging message?
From Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com>
Newsgroups comp.lang.python
Message-ID <mailman.372.1357834577.2939.python-list@python.org> (permalink)

Show all headers | View raw

On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 3:06 AM, Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> wrote:
> Well, this is fascinating.  It turns out that while all of our
> machines report that they're running 2.7.3, they have two different
> versions of /usr/lib/python2.7/logging/handlers.py!
>
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 45076 Aug  1 05:39 /usr/lib/python2.7/logging/handlers.py
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 45143 Apr 20  2012 /usr/lib/python2.7/logging/handlers.py

Ha, that would do it!

I don't have a corresponding system to compare against, but what
package is that file managed by?

$ dpkg -S /usr/lib/python2.7/logging/handlers.py

See if both systems show it as part of the same package, and if so, if
the package is at the same version on each. On my Maverick desktop, I
have 2.6, and the package is python2.6-minimal.

ChrisA

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Why BOM in logging message? roy@panix.com (Roy Smith) - 2013-01-09 17:54 -0500
  Re: Why BOM in logging message? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-01-10 10:07 +1100
    Re: Why BOM in logging message? Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2013-01-09 20:17 -0500
      Re: Why BOM in logging message? roy@panix.com (Roy Smith) - 2013-01-10 11:06 -0500
        Re: Why BOM in logging message? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-01-11 03:16 +1100
          Re: Why BOM in logging message? roy@panix.com (Roy Smith) - 2013-01-10 11:40 -0500
            Re: Why BOM in logging message? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-01-11 03:52 +1100
        Re: Why BOM in logging message? Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2013-01-10 18:45 -0500
  Re: Why BOM in logging message? John Gordon <gordon@panix.com> - 2013-01-09 23:19 +0000
    Re: Why BOM in logging message? Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2013-01-09 20:17 -0500

csiph-web