Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!us.feeder.erje.net!xlned.com!feeder7.xlned.com!news2.euro.net!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.049 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.90; '*S*': 0.00; 'package,': 0.03; 'root': 0.04; 'subject:Why': 0.09; 'aug': 0.13; 'from:addr:rosuav': 0.16; 'from:name:chris angelico': 0.16; 'roy': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.17; 'jan': 0.18; 'versions': 0.20; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.25; 'am,': 0.27; 'message-id:@mail.gmail.com': 0.27; 'fri,': 0.30; 'file': 0.32; 'running': 0.32; '11,': 0.33; 'turns': 0.33; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.33; 'version': 0.34; 'received:google.com': 0.34; 'machines': 0.35; 'so,': 0.35; 'subject:?': 0.35; 'received:209.85': 0.35; 'but': 0.36; 'compare': 0.36; 'two': 0.37; 'received:209': 0.37; 'subject:: ': 0.38; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'header:Received:5': 0.40; 'different': 0.63; 'show': 0.63; 'it!': 0.64; 'our': 0.65; 'smith': 0.71; '2013': 0.84; 'against,': 0.84; 'skip:/ 30': 0.91 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=f0yBYo2zNj2hO6mRov+jAn2/48+4AxUKAsnWV40Awog=; b=A+6IhTHhDGLT4INlvaAAMxcApw1VfOiAM6sj/39BakBqF3Lte7BF7cRL91D5C4apQX dueoLQmjhIGl5HK0s5DyDzl2O3ceTLyTgQ35+jVo3L9D+qwFlFH4yeF3Wbgf6yHSXKY/ wm777h3Dd+smLnT7Q3fQFs10czvvxuD5pFV8Nj5sVsMBKxSAlW0ZvV5b30uIOE28pqdn zJYhSPydb7xRjS7UOjKT6oJPNDjbq4B2KPo8fRjRIuomvhLOfKgYedWYQIazTohADBzr YnGMq8SakQs3o/zrB+xGhAueDbWnxMWMptDAwvYmlaPv58ADSrEndIUaDeFgRUxw328f CUBg== MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2013 03:16:09 +1100 Subject: Re: Why BOM in logging message? From: Chris Angelico To: python-list@python.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 20 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1357834578 news.xs4all.nl 6961 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:41598 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:36574 On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 3:06 AM, Roy Smith wrote: > Well, this is fascinating. It turns out that while all of our > machines report that they're running 2.7.3, they have two different > versions of /usr/lib/python2.7/logging/handlers.py! > > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 45076 Aug 1 05:39 /usr/lib/python2.7/logging/handlers.py > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 45143 Apr 20 2012 /usr/lib/python2.7/logging/handlers.py Ha, that would do it! I don't have a corresponding system to compare against, but what package is that file managed by? $ dpkg -S /usr/lib/python2.7/logging/handlers.py See if both systems show it as part of the same package, and if so, if the package is at the same version on each. On my Maverick desktop, I have 2.6, and the package is python2.6-minimal. ChrisA