Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #36577
| References | <kcksg2$bkp$1@panix2.panix.com> <roy-10B053.20174309012013@news.panix.com> <kcmoug$rk4$1@panix2.panix.com> <mailman.372.1357834577.2939.python-list@python.org> <kcmqu8$6gc$1@panix2.panix.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-01-11 03:52 +1100 |
| Subject | Re: Why BOM in logging message? |
| From | Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.373.1357836747.2939.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 3:40 AM, Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> wrote: >>On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 3:06 AM, Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> wrote: >>> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 45076 Aug 1 05:39 /usr/lib/python2.7/logging/handlers.py >>> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 45143 Apr 20 2012 /usr/lib/python2.7/logging/handlers.py > > Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> wrote: >>$ dpkg -S /usr/lib/python2.7/logging/handlers.py > > Yup, on some machines we've got 2.7.3-0ubuntu3, and on others, > 2.7.3-0ubuntu3.1 of python2.7-minimal. Details at: > > https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python2.7/2.7.3-0ubuntu3.1 I love it when everything adds up! The message even cites the specific change. It's like a cryptic crossword - once you get the answer, you KNOW it's the answer because suddenly it all makes sense :) Thanks for bringing a fun problem to solve! It's (unfortunately) a refreshing change to read a post from someone who knows how to ask smart questions. ChrisA
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Why BOM in logging message? roy@panix.com (Roy Smith) - 2013-01-09 17:54 -0500
Re: Why BOM in logging message? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-01-10 10:07 +1100
Re: Why BOM in logging message? Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2013-01-09 20:17 -0500
Re: Why BOM in logging message? roy@panix.com (Roy Smith) - 2013-01-10 11:06 -0500
Re: Why BOM in logging message? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-01-11 03:16 +1100
Re: Why BOM in logging message? roy@panix.com (Roy Smith) - 2013-01-10 11:40 -0500
Re: Why BOM in logging message? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-01-11 03:52 +1100
Re: Why BOM in logging message? Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2013-01-10 18:45 -0500
Re: Why BOM in logging message? John Gordon <gordon@panix.com> - 2013-01-09 23:19 +0000
Re: Why BOM in logging message? Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2013-01-09 20:17 -0500
csiph-web