Re: Is threading better on Usenet or gmane?

Path	csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!not-for-mail
From	Grant Edwards <grant.b.edwards@gmail.com>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.python
Subject	Re: Is threading better on Usenet or gmane?
Date	Mon, 11 Apr 2016 17:16:36 +0000 (UTC)
Lines	39
Message-ID	<mailman.33.1460395209.15650.python-list@python.org> (permalink)
References	<negc2n$lr0$1@reader1.panix.com> <1460385693.3220159.575241033.0E32F975@webmail.messagingengine.com> <mailman.31.1460385695.15650.python-list@python.org> <negdti$mum$1@reader1.panix.com> <neghj4$q02$1@reader1.panix.com> <negm5k$ife$1@ger.gmane.org>
X-Trace	news.uni-berlin.de Xjd1XkfXaFebPZMTR7zL/wkNkwQwhQ3ygAS3jUw2eVQw==
Return-Path	<python-python-list@m.gmane.org>
X-Original-To	python-list@python.org
Delivered-To	python-list@mail.python.org
X-Spam-Status	OK 0.002
X-Spam-Evidence	'H': 1.00; 'S': 0.00; 'broken': 0.03; 'indicates': 0.09; 'received:80.91': 0.09; 'received:80.91.229': 0.09; 'received:gmane.org': 0.09; 'received:list': 0.09; 'received:qwest.net': 0.09; 'unavailable': 0.09; 'thread': 0.10; 'assume': 0.11; 'question.': 0.13; 'gmane': 0.16; 'mailing-list': 0.16; 'normal,': 0.16; 'received:80.91.229.3': 0.16; 'received:io': 0.16; 'received:plane.gmane.org': 0.16; 'received:psf.io': 0.16; 'usenet': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.16; 'version.': 0.18; "aren't": 0.22; 'appears': 0.23; 'finished': 0.23; 'references': 0.23; 'this:': 0.23; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.26; 'header:X-Complaints-To:1': 0.26; 'checking': 0.27; '"no': 0.29; 'header,': 0.29; 'references.': 0.29; "i'm": 0.30; 'posts': 0.30; 'probably': 0.31; 'surprised': 0.33; 'server': 0.34; "isn't": 0.35; 'but': 0.36; 'should': 0.36; 'there': 0.36; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.36; 'subject:?': 0.36; 'subject:: ': 0.37; 'two': 0.37; 'received:org': 0.37; 'difference': 0.38; 'version': 0.38; 'means': 0.39; 'test': 0.39; "didn't": 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.40; 'side': 0.62; 'skip:n 10': 0.62; 'due': 0.65; 'articles': 0.67; 'situation': 0.67; 'article': 0.77; 'tribute': 0.84; 'articles,': 0.91; 'edwards': 0.91
X-Injected-Via-Gmane	http://gmane.org/
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host	67-130-15-94.dia.static.qwest.net
User-Agent	slrn/1.0.2 (Linux)
X-BeenThere	python-list@python.org
X-Mailman-Version	2.1.21
Precedence	list
List-Id	General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org>
List-Unsubscribe	<https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive	<http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/>
List-Post	<mailto:python-list@python.org>
List-Help	<mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe	<https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe>
X-Mailman-Original-Message-ID	<negm5k$ife$1@ger.gmane.org>
X-Mailman-Original-References	<negc2n$lr0$1@reader1.panix.com> <1460385693.3220159.575241033.0E32F975@webmail.messagingengine.com> <mailman.31.1460385695.15650.python-list@python.org> <negdti$mum$1@reader1.panix.com> <neghj4$q02$1@reader1.panix.com>
Xref	csiph.com comp.lang.python:106887

Show key headers only | View raw

On 2016-04-11, Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> wrote:
> On 2016-04-11, Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>
> I just finished checking a very recent thread containing 67 articles
> by pointing slrn at news.panix.com for the Usenet version and at
> news.gmane.com for the mailing-list version.
[...]
> On the Usenet side, 35 of 67 articles had unavailable parent
> articles,
[...]
> On the mailing-list side 15 of 67 had unavailable parent articles,

FWIW, an automated test on the 1000 most recent articles showed this:

                         Usenet   Gmane
        No References      69      104
   Unavailable Parent     357       34

Due to moderation/filtering, the set of articles from the two servers
probably isn't identical.

For posts that aren't follow-ups, no references is normal, but I'm
surprised by the size of the difference in number of articles with no
references header.

An unavailable parent means that there _was_ a refrences header, but
the most recent reference didn't map to an available article on the
server in question.

In general, the situation appears to be significantly better on Gmane
-- even if we assume that the excess number of "no reference"
ariticles on Gmane indicates those articles are broken and should have
references.

-- 
Grant Edwards               grant.b.edwards        Yow! Let me do my TRIBUTE
                                  at               to FISHNET STOCKINGS ...
                              gmail.com

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Is threading better on Usenet or gmane? Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2016-04-11 14:24 +0000
  Re: Is threading better on Usenet or gmane? Random832 <random832@fastmail.com> - 2016-04-11 10:41 -0400
    Re: Is threading better on Usenet or gmane? Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2016-04-11 14:55 +0000
      Re: Is threading better on Usenet or gmane? Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2016-04-11 15:58 +0000
        Re: Is threading better on Usenet or gmane? Grant Edwards <grant.b.edwards@gmail.com> - 2016-04-11 17:16 +0000

csiph-web