Is threading better on Usenet or gmane?

From	Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.python
Subject	Is threading better on Usenet or gmane?
Date	2016-04-11 14:24 +0000
Organization	PANIX Public Access Internet and UNIX, NYC
Message-ID	<negc2n$lr0$1@reader1.panix.com> (permalink)

Show all headers | View raw

I've been reading c.l.p on Usenet for many, many years.  There has
always been a certain abount of thread breakage (presumably due to
broken e-mail clients and/or the list<->usenet gateway), but it seems
to have gotten worse lately.

Has anybody noticed whether the threading is less broken if one reads
the list on gmane?  Everytime I decide to try to do a direct
comparison, I can't find enough thread breaks to tell if there's a
significant difference.

-- 
Grant Edwards               grant.b.edwards        Yow! Somewhere in Tenafly,
                                  at               New Jersey, a chiropractor
                              gmail.com            is viewing "Leave it to
                                                   Beaver"!

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Is threading better on Usenet or gmane? Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2016-04-11 14:24 +0000
  Re: Is threading better on Usenet or gmane? Random832 <random832@fastmail.com> - 2016-04-11 10:41 -0400
    Re: Is threading better on Usenet or gmane? Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2016-04-11 14:55 +0000
      Re: Is threading better on Usenet or gmane? Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2016-04-11 15:58 +0000
        Re: Is threading better on Usenet or gmane? Grant Edwards <grant.b.edwards@gmail.com> - 2016-04-11 17:16 +0000

csiph-web