Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #32683
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-11-03 01:26 -0700 |
| References | <utrpl9-udk.ln1@satorlaser.homedns.org> <20121026212602.GE25893@ccapuser-ubuntu.WICOURTS.GOV> <508B0272.2020003@davea.name> <mailman.2907.1351287734.27098.python-list@python.org> |
| Subject | Re: better way for ' '.join(args) + '\n'? |
| From | Ramchandra Apte <maniandram01@gmail.com> |
| Message-ID | <mailman.3231.1351931178.27098.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
On Saturday, 27 October 2012 03:12:31 UTC+5:30, Tycho Andersen wrote: > On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 05:36:50PM -0400, Dave Angel wrote: > > > On 10/26/2012 05:26 PM, Tycho Andersen wrote: > > > > Assuming it's the length of the list that's the problem, not the > > > > length of the strings in the list... > > > > > > > > args = ['foo', 'bar', 'baz'] > > > > args[-1] = args[-1] + '\n' > > > > line = ' '.join(args) > > > > > > > > \t > > > > > > Main problem with that is the trailing space before the newline. If > > > that's not a problem, then fine. > > > > What trailing space before the newline? The other solutions have it, > > the above does not. However, the above does mutate args, which isn't > > all that great. Alas, if you want the performance of mutable > > structures, you're probably going to have to mutate something. (In any > > case, it's easy enough to change it back, though ugly.) > > > > > Not sure why we try so hard to optimize something that's going to take > > > negligible time. > > > > The same reason some people enjoy sporting events: it's fun :-) Me too > > > > \t
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
better way for ' '.join(args) + '\n'? Ulrich Eckhardt <ulrich.eckhardt@dominolaser.com> - 2012-10-26 09:49 +0200
Re: better way for ' '.join(args) + '\n'? Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> - 2012-10-26 10:58 +0200
Re: better way for ' '.join(args) + '\n'? Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2012-10-26 09:36 +0000
Re: better way for ' '.join(args) + '\n'? Hubert Grünheidt <hgruenheidt@t-online.de> - 2012-10-26 18:21 +0200
Re: better way for ' '.join(args) + '\n'? Tycho Andersen <tycho@tycho.ws> - 2012-10-26 16:26 -0500
Re: better way for ' '.join(args) + '\n'? Dave Angel <d@davea.name> - 2012-10-26 17:36 -0400
Re: better way for ' '.join(args) + '\n'? Tycho Andersen <tycho@tycho.ws> - 2012-10-26 16:42 -0500
Re: better way for ' '.join(args) + '\n'? Ramchandra Apte <maniandram01@gmail.com> - 2012-11-03 01:26 -0700
Re: better way for ' '.join(args) + '\n'? Ramchandra Apte <maniandram01@gmail.com> - 2012-11-03 01:26 -0700
Re: better way for ' '.join(args) + '\n'? Thomas Rachel <nutznetz-0c1b6768-bfa9-48d5-a470-7603bd3aa915@spamschutz.glglgl.de> - 2012-10-27 11:26 +0200
RE: better way for ' '.join(args) + '\n'? "Prasad, Ramit" <ramit.prasad@jpmorgan.com> - 2012-10-29 22:28 +0000
csiph-web