Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #32235
| Date | 2012-10-26 17:36 -0400 |
|---|---|
| From | Dave Angel <d@davea.name> |
| Subject | Re: better way for ' '.join(args) + '\n'? |
| References | <utrpl9-udk.ln1@satorlaser.homedns.org> <20121026212602.GE25893@ccapuser-ubuntu.WICOURTS.GOV> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.2906.1351287451.27098.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
On 10/26/2012 05:26 PM, Tycho Andersen wrote: > On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 09:49:50AM +0200, Ulrich Eckhardt wrote: >> Hi! >> >> General advise when assembling strings is to not concatenate them >> repeatedly but instead use string's join() function, because it >> avoids repeated reallocations and is at least as expressive as any >> alternative. >> >> What I have now is a case where I'm assembling lines of text for >> driving a program with a commandline interface. In this scenario, >> I'm currently doing this: >> >> args = ['foo', 'bar', 'baz'] >> line = ' '.join(args) + '\n' > Assuming it's the length of the list that's the problem, not the > length of the strings in the list... > > args = ['foo', 'bar', 'baz'] > args[-1] = args[-1] + '\n' > line = ' '.join(args) > > \t Main problem with that is the trailing space before the newline. If that's not a problem, then fine. Not sure why we try so hard to optimize something that's going to take negligible time. -- DaveA
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
better way for ' '.join(args) + '\n'? Ulrich Eckhardt <ulrich.eckhardt@dominolaser.com> - 2012-10-26 09:49 +0200
Re: better way for ' '.join(args) + '\n'? Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> - 2012-10-26 10:58 +0200
Re: better way for ' '.join(args) + '\n'? Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2012-10-26 09:36 +0000
Re: better way for ' '.join(args) + '\n'? Hubert Grünheidt <hgruenheidt@t-online.de> - 2012-10-26 18:21 +0200
Re: better way for ' '.join(args) + '\n'? Tycho Andersen <tycho@tycho.ws> - 2012-10-26 16:26 -0500
Re: better way for ' '.join(args) + '\n'? Dave Angel <d@davea.name> - 2012-10-26 17:36 -0400
Re: better way for ' '.join(args) + '\n'? Tycho Andersen <tycho@tycho.ws> - 2012-10-26 16:42 -0500
Re: better way for ' '.join(args) + '\n'? Ramchandra Apte <maniandram01@gmail.com> - 2012-11-03 01:26 -0700
Re: better way for ' '.join(args) + '\n'? Ramchandra Apte <maniandram01@gmail.com> - 2012-11-03 01:26 -0700
Re: better way for ' '.join(args) + '\n'? Thomas Rachel <nutznetz-0c1b6768-bfa9-48d5-a470-7603bd3aa915@spamschutz.glglgl.de> - 2012-10-27 11:26 +0200
RE: better way for ' '.join(args) + '\n'? "Prasad, Ramit" <ramit.prasad@jpmorgan.com> - 2012-10-29 22:28 +0000
csiph-web