Path: csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!news.albasani.net!newsfeed.freenet.ag!news2.euro.net!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed6.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.008 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.98; '*S*': 0.00; 'args': 0.04; 'great.': 0.07; 'trailing': 0.07; 'args,': 0.09; 'list...': 0.09; 'mutable': 0.09; 'to:addr:comp.lang.python': 0.09; 'cc:addr:python-list': 0.10; ':-)': 0.13; 'fine.': 0.16; 'oct': 0.16; 'structures,': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.17; '(in': 0.18; 'assuming': 0.22; 'cc:no real name:2**0': 0.24; 'cc:addr:python.org': 0.25; 'header:In-Reply- To:1': 0.25; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.26; 'cc:2**2': 0.27; 'case,': 0.29; 'probably': 0.29; 'fri,': 0.30; 'not.': 0.32; 'problem': 0.33; 'received:google.com': 0.34; 'list': 0.35; 'problem,': 0.35; 'pm,': 0.35; 'received:209.85': 0.35; 'something': 0.35; 'too': 0.36; 'enough': 0.36; 'october': 0.37; 'does': 0.37; 'why': 0.37; 'received:209': 0.37; 'received:209.85.216': 0.37; 'subject:: ': 0.38; 'some': 0.38; 'sure': 0.38; 'performance': 0.39; 'space': 0.39; 'easy': 0.60; 'fun': 0.64; '26,': 0.65; 'enjoy': 0.67; 'subject:better': 0.84; 'sporting': 0.91; 'angel': 0.93 Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Date: Sat, 3 Nov 2012 01:26:09 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=122.167.245.218; posting-account=uPFZNQoAAAAm9w7z13q1SjWNKNjztdcD References: <20121026212602.GE25893@ccapuser-ubuntu.WICOURTS.GOV> <508B0272.2020003@davea.name> User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-Google-Web-Client: true X-Google-IP: 122.167.245.218 MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: better way for ' '.join(args) + '\n'? From: Ramchandra Apte To: comp.lang.python@googlegroups.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: python-list@python.org, Dave Angel , Ulrich Eckhardt X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Message-ID: Lines: 53 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1351931178 news.xs4all.nl 6842 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:50267 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:32683 On Saturday, 27 October 2012 03:12:31 UTC+5:30, Tycho Andersen wrote: > On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 05:36:50PM -0400, Dave Angel wrote: > > > On 10/26/2012 05:26 PM, Tycho Andersen wrote: > > > > Assuming it's the length of the list that's the problem, not the > > > > length of the strings in the list... > > > > > > > > args = ['foo', 'bar', 'baz'] > > > > args[-1] = args[-1] + '\n' > > > > line = ' '.join(args) > > > > > > > > \t > > > > > > Main problem with that is the trailing space before the newline. If > > > that's not a problem, then fine. > > > > What trailing space before the newline? The other solutions have it, > > the above does not. However, the above does mutate args, which isn't > > all that great. Alas, if you want the performance of mutable > > structures, you're probably going to have to mutate something. (In any > > case, it's easy enough to change it back, though ugly.) > > > > > Not sure why we try so hard to optimize something that's going to take > > > negligible time. > > > > The same reason some people enjoy sporting events: it's fun :-) Me too > > > > \t