Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.python > #60210

Re: Traceback when using multiprocessing, less than helpful?

Path csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!goblin2!goblin.stu.neva.ru!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed4.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail
Return-Path <python-python-list@m.gmane.org>
X-Original-To python-list@python.org
Delivered-To python-list@mail.python.org
X-Spam-Status OK 0.001
X-Spam-Evidence '*H*': 1.00; '*S*': 0.00; 'from:addr:yahoo.co.uk': 0.04; 'string.': 0.05; 'lawrence': 0.09; 'received:80.91': 0.09; 'received:80.91.229': 0.09; 'received:gmane.org': 0.09; 'received:list': 0.09; 'subject:using': 0.09; 'tismer': 0.09; 'python': 0.11; '"hack"': 0.16; 'received:80.91.229.3': 0.16; 'received:plane.gmane.org': 0.16; 'subject:skip:m 10': 0.16; 'subject:when': 0.16; 'language': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; 'programming': 0.22; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.23; 'passes': 0.24; 'second': 0.26; 'header:X-Complaints-To:1': 0.27; 'header:In- Reply-To:1': 0.27; 'maybe': 0.34; 'but': 0.35; "i'll": 0.36; 'subject:?': 0.36; 'christian': 0.38; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.38; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'received:org': 0.40; 'world.': 0.61; 'john': 0.61; 'due': 0.66; 'saturday': 0.68; '3.4': 0.84; 'wait,': 0.93
X-Injected-Via-Gmane http://gmane.org/
To python-list@python.org
From Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk>
Subject Re: Traceback when using multiprocessing, less than helpful?
Date Fri, 22 Nov 2013 09:09:48 +0000
References <e92311cb-6cc5-415a-bbf8-544c0c9c6a54@googlegroups.com> <081af7df-2330-4b8b-abbf-4707edfcc17a@googlegroups.com>
Mime-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding 7bit
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host host-92-24-220-150.ppp.as43234.net
User-Agent Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.1.1
In-Reply-To <081af7df-2330-4b8b-abbf-4707edfcc17a@googlegroups.com>
X-BeenThere python-list@python.org
X-Mailman-Version 2.1.15
Precedence list
List-Id General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org>
List-Unsubscribe <https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/>
List-Post <mailto:python-list@python.org>
List-Help <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe <https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe>
Newsgroups comp.lang.python
Message-ID <mailman.3031.1385111409.18130.python-list@python.org> (permalink)
Lines 13
NNTP-Posting-Host 2001:888:2000:d::a6
X-Trace 1385111409 news.xs4all.nl 15894 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:60391
X-Complaints-To abuse@xs4all.nl
Xref csiph.com comp.lang.python:60210

Show key headers only | View raw

On 22/11/2013 03:57, John Ladasky wrote:
>
> ...Richard submits his "hack" (his description) to Python 3.4 which pickles and passes the string.  When time permits, I'll try it out.  Or maybe I'll wait, since Python 3.4.0 is still in alpha.
>

FTR beta 1 is due this Saturday 24/11/2013.

-- 
Python is the second best programming language in the world.
But the best has yet to be invented.  Christian Tismer

Mark Lawrence

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Traceback when using multiprocessing, less than helpful? John Ladasky <john_ladasky@sbcglobal.net> - 2013-11-21 09:01 -0800
  Re: Traceback when using multiprocessing, less than helpful? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-11-22 04:24 +1100
    Re: Traceback when using multiprocessing, less than helpful? John Ladasky <john_ladasky@sbcglobal.net> - 2013-11-21 10:25 -0800
      Re: Traceback when using multiprocessing, less than helpful? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-11-22 07:53 +1100
        Re: Traceback when using multiprocessing, less than helpful? John Ladasky <john_ladasky@sbcglobal.net> - 2013-11-21 13:19 -0800
          Re: Traceback when using multiprocessing, less than helpful? John Ladasky <john_ladasky@sbcglobal.net> - 2013-11-21 13:49 -0800
            Re: Traceback when using multiprocessing, less than helpful? Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> - 2013-11-21 14:32 -0800
  Re: Traceback when using multiprocessing, less than helpful? Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2013-11-21 17:37 -0500
  Re: Traceback when using multiprocessing, less than helpful? John Ladasky <john_ladasky@sbcglobal.net> - 2013-11-21 19:57 -0800
    Re: Traceback when using multiprocessing, less than helpful? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-11-22 15:24 +1100
      Why pickling (was: Traceback when using multiprocessing) John Ladasky <john_ladasky@sbcglobal.net> - 2013-11-22 08:38 -0800
        Re: Why pickling (was: Traceback when using multiprocessing) Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-11-23 10:50 +1100
    Re: Traceback when using multiprocessing, less than helpful? Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2013-11-22 09:09 +0000

csiph-web