Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.python > #60210

Re: Traceback when using multiprocessing, less than helpful?

From Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk>
Subject Re: Traceback when using multiprocessing, less than helpful?
Date 2013-11-22 09:09 +0000
References <e92311cb-6cc5-415a-bbf8-544c0c9c6a54@googlegroups.com> <081af7df-2330-4b8b-abbf-4707edfcc17a@googlegroups.com>
Newsgroups comp.lang.python
Message-ID <mailman.3031.1385111409.18130.python-list@python.org> (permalink)

Show all headers | View raw

On 22/11/2013 03:57, John Ladasky wrote:
>
> ...Richard submits his "hack" (his description) to Python 3.4 which pickles and passes the string.  When time permits, I'll try it out.  Or maybe I'll wait, since Python 3.4.0 is still in alpha.
>

FTR beta 1 is due this Saturday 24/11/2013.

-- 
Python is the second best programming language in the world.
But the best has yet to be invented.  Christian Tismer

Mark Lawrence

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Traceback when using multiprocessing, less than helpful? John Ladasky <john_ladasky@sbcglobal.net> - 2013-11-21 09:01 -0800
  Re: Traceback when using multiprocessing, less than helpful? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-11-22 04:24 +1100
    Re: Traceback when using multiprocessing, less than helpful? John Ladasky <john_ladasky@sbcglobal.net> - 2013-11-21 10:25 -0800
      Re: Traceback when using multiprocessing, less than helpful? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-11-22 07:53 +1100
        Re: Traceback when using multiprocessing, less than helpful? John Ladasky <john_ladasky@sbcglobal.net> - 2013-11-21 13:19 -0800
          Re: Traceback when using multiprocessing, less than helpful? John Ladasky <john_ladasky@sbcglobal.net> - 2013-11-21 13:49 -0800
            Re: Traceback when using multiprocessing, less than helpful? Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> - 2013-11-21 14:32 -0800
  Re: Traceback when using multiprocessing, less than helpful? Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2013-11-21 17:37 -0500
  Re: Traceback when using multiprocessing, less than helpful? John Ladasky <john_ladasky@sbcglobal.net> - 2013-11-21 19:57 -0800
    Re: Traceback when using multiprocessing, less than helpful? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-11-22 15:24 +1100
      Why pickling (was: Traceback when using multiprocessing) John Ladasky <john_ladasky@sbcglobal.net> - 2013-11-22 08:38 -0800
        Re: Why pickling (was: Traceback when using multiprocessing) Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-11-23 10:50 +1100
    Re: Traceback when using multiprocessing, less than helpful? Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2013-11-22 09:09 +0000

csiph-web