Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.python > #60177

Re: Traceback when using multiprocessing, less than helpful?

Date 2013-11-21 14:32 -0800
From Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us>
Subject Re: Traceback when using multiprocessing, less than helpful?
References (1 earlier) <mailman.3013.1385054683.18130.python-list@python.org> <9eb71131-7ca0-4a21-a8f3-98371ee8787e@googlegroups.com> <mailman.3014.1385067196.18130.python-list@python.org> <46e03756-a242-4cdd-a5c0-30fcff34c98c@googlegroups.com> <e90dbd18-97ae-4e92-b521-5818d015244a@googlegroups.com>
Newsgroups comp.lang.python
Message-ID <mailman.3016.1385073129.18130.python-list@python.org> (permalink)

Show all headers | View raw

On 11/21/2013 01:49 PM, John Ladasky wrote:
>
> So now, for anyone who is still reading this: is it your
> opinion that the traceback that I obtained through
>  multiprocessing.pool._map_async().get() SHOULD have allowed
>  me to see what the ultimate cause of the exception was?

It would certainly be nice.

> I think so.  Is it a bug?  Should I request a bugfix?  How
> do I go about doing that?

Check out bugs.python.org.  Search for multiprocessing and tracebacks to see if anything is already there; if not, 
create a new issue.

--
~Ethan~

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Traceback when using multiprocessing, less than helpful? John Ladasky <john_ladasky@sbcglobal.net> - 2013-11-21 09:01 -0800
  Re: Traceback when using multiprocessing, less than helpful? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-11-22 04:24 +1100
    Re: Traceback when using multiprocessing, less than helpful? John Ladasky <john_ladasky@sbcglobal.net> - 2013-11-21 10:25 -0800
      Re: Traceback when using multiprocessing, less than helpful? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-11-22 07:53 +1100
        Re: Traceback when using multiprocessing, less than helpful? John Ladasky <john_ladasky@sbcglobal.net> - 2013-11-21 13:19 -0800
          Re: Traceback when using multiprocessing, less than helpful? John Ladasky <john_ladasky@sbcglobal.net> - 2013-11-21 13:49 -0800
            Re: Traceback when using multiprocessing, less than helpful? Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> - 2013-11-21 14:32 -0800
  Re: Traceback when using multiprocessing, less than helpful? Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2013-11-21 17:37 -0500
  Re: Traceback when using multiprocessing, less than helpful? John Ladasky <john_ladasky@sbcglobal.net> - 2013-11-21 19:57 -0800
    Re: Traceback when using multiprocessing, less than helpful? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-11-22 15:24 +1100
      Why pickling (was: Traceback when using multiprocessing) John Ladasky <john_ladasky@sbcglobal.net> - 2013-11-22 08:38 -0800
        Re: Why pickling (was: Traceback when using multiprocessing) Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-11-23 10:50 +1100
    Re: Traceback when using multiprocessing, less than helpful? Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2013-11-22 09:09 +0000

csiph-web