Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.python > #90277

Re: Is this unpythonic?

Path csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!border1.nntp.ams1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed3a.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail
Return-Path <python-python-list@m.gmane.org>
X-Original-To python-list@python.org
Delivered-To python-list@mail.python.org
X-Spam-Status OK 0.011
X-Spam-Evidence '*H*': 0.98; '*S*': 0.00; 'argument': 0.05; 'modify': 0.07; 'odd': 0.07; 'explanation': 0.09; 'promising': 0.09; 'received:80.91': 0.09; 'received:80.91.229': 0.09; 'received:gmane.org': 0.09; 'received:list': 0.09; 'def': 0.12; 'wrote': 0.14; 'mutable': 0.16; 'reasonably': 0.16; 'received:80.91.229.3': 0.16; 'received:plane.gmane.org': 0.16; 'thereby': 0.16; 'tuple': 0.16; 'appropriate': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; 'all,': 0.19; '>>>': 0.22; 'instead.': 0.24; 'define': 0.26; 'somewhere': 0.26; 'header:X-Complaints-To:1': 0.27; 'idea': 0.28; 'point': 0.28; 'testing': 0.29; 'code': 0.31; 'globally': 0.31; 'overhead': 0.31; 'comment': 0.34; 'problem': 0.35; 'point.': 0.35; 'add': 0.35; 'there': 0.35; 'really': 0.36; 'subject:?': 0.36; 'should': 0.36; 'too': 0.37; 'list': 0.37; 'list.': 0.37; 'step': 0.37; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.38; 'bad': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'received:org': 0.40; 'how': 0.40; 'easy': 0.60; 'dave': 0.60; 'simple': 0.61; "you're": 0.61; 'show': 0.63; 'became': 0.64; 'situation': 0.65; 'frank': 0.68; 'nobody': 0.68; 'reads': 0.68; 'default': 0.69; 'safe': 0.72; 'subject:this': 0.83; 'angel': 0.91; 'technique': 0.93
X-Injected-Via-Gmane http://gmane.org/
To python-list@python.org
From "Frank Millman" <frank@chagford.com>
Subject Re: Is this unpythonic?
Date Sun, 10 May 2015 10:58:44 +0200
References <mailman.224.1431072121.12865.python-list@python.org> <554c8b0a$0$12992$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <mii4il$vv$1@ger.gmane.org> <mailman.239.1431086688.12865.python-list@python.org> <min3f0$2gh$1@news.albasani.net>
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host 197.89.67.74
X-MSMail-Priority Normal
X-Newsreader Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.3790.4657
X-RFC2646 Format=Flowed; Original
X-MimeOLE Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.3790.4913
X-BeenThere python-list@python.org
X-Mailman-Version 2.1.20+
Precedence list
List-Id General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org>
List-Unsubscribe <https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/>
List-Post <mailto:python-list@python.org>
List-Help <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe <https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe>
Newsgroups comp.lang.python
Message-ID <mailman.302.1431248365.12865.python-list@python.org> (permalink)
Lines 60
NNTP-Posting-Host 2001:888:2000:d::a6
X-Trace 1431248365 news.xs4all.nl 2917 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:57791
X-Complaints-To abuse@xs4all.nl
Xref csiph.com comp.lang.python:90277

Show key headers only | View raw


"Johannes Bauer" <dfnsonfsduifb@gmx.de> wrote in message 
news:min3f0$2gh$1@news.albasani.net...
On 08.05.2015 14:04, Dave Angel wrote:

> > It might be appropriate to define the list at top-level, as
> >
> > EMPTY_LIST=[]
> >
> > and in your default argument as
> >     def x(y, z=EMPTY_LIST):
> >
> > and with the all-caps, you're thereby promising that nobody will modify
> > that list.

> I think it's a really bad idea to use a module-global mutable
> "EMPTY_LIST". It's much too easy this happens:

> # Globally
> >>> EMPTY_LIST = [ ]

> # At somewhere in the code at some point in time
> >>> foo = EMPTY_LIST
> >>> foo.append(123)
> >>> print(foo)
> [123]

> # Some other place in code
> >>> bar = EMPTY_LIST
> >>> print(bar)
> [123]


A fair point. How about this as an alternative?

If one were to use this technique at all, it would be necessary to add a 
comment at the top explaining the reason for this odd declaration.

It is then a simple extra step to say -

EMPTY_L:IST = ()

and if required -

EMPTY_DICT = ()

and expand the explanation to show why a tuple is used instead.

So if there was a situation where the overhead of testing for None became a 
problem, this solution offers the following -

1. it solves the 'overhead' problem
2. it reads reasonably intuitively in the body of the program
3. it is safe
4. it should not be difficult to write a suitable self-explanatory comment

Frank


Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Is this unpythonic? "Frank Millman" <frank@chagford.com> - 2015-05-08 10:01 +0200
  Re: Is this unpythonic? Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2015-05-08 20:08 +1000
    Re: Is this unpythonic? "Frank Millman" <frank@chagford.com> - 2015-05-08 12:53 +0200
      Re: Is this unpythonic? Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2015-05-09 01:07 +1000
        Re: Is this unpythonic? "Frank Millman" <frank@chagford.com> - 2015-05-09 07:56 +0200
        Re: Is this unpythonic? "Frank Millman" <frank@chagford.com> - 2015-05-09 08:51 +0200
          Re: Is this unpythonic? Gregory Ewing <greg.ewing@canterbury.ac.nz> - 2015-05-09 19:47 +1200
            Re: Is this unpythonic? "Frank Millman" <frank@chagford.com> - 2015-05-09 11:10 +0200
    Re: Is this unpythonic? Dave Angel <davea@davea.name> - 2015-05-08 08:04 -0400
      Re: Is this unpythonic? Johannes Bauer <dfnsonfsduifb@gmx.de> - 2015-05-10 10:04 +0200
        Re: Is this unpythonic? "Frank Millman" <frank@chagford.com> - 2015-05-10 10:58 +0200
          Re: Is this unpythonic? Johannes Bauer <dfnsonfsduifb@gmx.de> - 2015-05-10 11:54 +0200
            Re: Is this unpythonic? "Frank Millman" <frank@chagford.com> - 2015-05-10 12:40 +0200
    Re: Is this unpythonic? "Frank Millman" <frank@chagford.com> - 2015-05-08 15:12 +0200

csiph-web