Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #90218
| From | Gregory Ewing <greg.ewing@canterbury.ac.nz> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Subject | Re: Is this unpythonic? |
| Date | 2015-05-09 19:47 +1200 |
| Message-ID | <cr5sc6FgfmiU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | (1 earlier) <554c8b0a$0$12992$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <mailman.231.1431082398.12865.python-list@python.org> <554cd119$0$12977$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <mik7j6$59n$1@ger.gmane.org> <mailman.273.1431154310.12865.python-list@python.org> |
Frank Millman wrote:
> There are two operations I might perform on the dictionary -
>
> 1. iterate over the keys and retrieve the values
>
> 2: use 'in' to test if a given string exists as a key
>
> Both of these operations will work on a tuple and give the desired result,
> so it is a very valid workaround.
Although if I were reviewing a function like that,
it would probably make me pause for a moment or two
to consider why a tuple was being used as a value
for a parameter that is ostensibly supposed to be
a dict, and convince myself that it was okay.
The absolutely clearest way to write it would
probably be
def f(things = None):
"things is a mapping of stuff to be operated on"
if things:
for key in things:
value = things[key]
...
A default value of None is a well-established idiom
for "this parameter is optional", and "if x:" is
idiomatic for "if I've been given an x", so writing it
that way has the best chance of passing the "pretty much
what you expect" test for good code. :-)
--
Greg
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Is this unpythonic? "Frank Millman" <frank@chagford.com> - 2015-05-08 10:01 +0200
Re: Is this unpythonic? Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2015-05-08 20:08 +1000
Re: Is this unpythonic? "Frank Millman" <frank@chagford.com> - 2015-05-08 12:53 +0200
Re: Is this unpythonic? Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2015-05-09 01:07 +1000
Re: Is this unpythonic? "Frank Millman" <frank@chagford.com> - 2015-05-09 07:56 +0200
Re: Is this unpythonic? "Frank Millman" <frank@chagford.com> - 2015-05-09 08:51 +0200
Re: Is this unpythonic? Gregory Ewing <greg.ewing@canterbury.ac.nz> - 2015-05-09 19:47 +1200
Re: Is this unpythonic? "Frank Millman" <frank@chagford.com> - 2015-05-09 11:10 +0200
Re: Is this unpythonic? Dave Angel <davea@davea.name> - 2015-05-08 08:04 -0400
Re: Is this unpythonic? Johannes Bauer <dfnsonfsduifb@gmx.de> - 2015-05-10 10:04 +0200
Re: Is this unpythonic? "Frank Millman" <frank@chagford.com> - 2015-05-10 10:58 +0200
Re: Is this unpythonic? Johannes Bauer <dfnsonfsduifb@gmx.de> - 2015-05-10 11:54 +0200
Re: Is this unpythonic? "Frank Millman" <frank@chagford.com> - 2015-05-10 12:40 +0200
Re: Is this unpythonic? "Frank Millman" <frank@chagford.com> - 2015-05-08 15:12 +0200
csiph-web