Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.python > #90277

Re: Is this unpythonic?

From "Frank Millman" <frank@chagford.com>
Subject Re: Is this unpythonic?
Date 2015-05-10 10:58 +0200
References <mailman.224.1431072121.12865.python-list@python.org> <554c8b0a$0$12992$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <mii4il$vv$1@ger.gmane.org> <mailman.239.1431086688.12865.python-list@python.org> <min3f0$2gh$1@news.albasani.net>
Newsgroups comp.lang.python
Message-ID <mailman.302.1431248365.12865.python-list@python.org> (permalink)

Show all headers | View raw


"Johannes Bauer" <dfnsonfsduifb@gmx.de> wrote in message 
news:min3f0$2gh$1@news.albasani.net...
On 08.05.2015 14:04, Dave Angel wrote:

> > It might be appropriate to define the list at top-level, as
> >
> > EMPTY_LIST=[]
> >
> > and in your default argument as
> >     def x(y, z=EMPTY_LIST):
> >
> > and with the all-caps, you're thereby promising that nobody will modify
> > that list.

> I think it's a really bad idea to use a module-global mutable
> "EMPTY_LIST". It's much too easy this happens:

> # Globally
> >>> EMPTY_LIST = [ ]

> # At somewhere in the code at some point in time
> >>> foo = EMPTY_LIST
> >>> foo.append(123)
> >>> print(foo)
> [123]

> # Some other place in code
> >>> bar = EMPTY_LIST
> >>> print(bar)
> [123]


A fair point. How about this as an alternative?

If one were to use this technique at all, it would be necessary to add a 
comment at the top explaining the reason for this odd declaration.

It is then a simple extra step to say -

EMPTY_L:IST = ()

and if required -

EMPTY_DICT = ()

and expand the explanation to show why a tuple is used instead.

So if there was a situation where the overhead of testing for None became a 
problem, this solution offers the following -

1. it solves the 'overhead' problem
2. it reads reasonably intuitively in the body of the program
3. it is safe
4. it should not be difficult to write a suitable self-explanatory comment

Frank


Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Is this unpythonic? "Frank Millman" <frank@chagford.com> - 2015-05-08 10:01 +0200
  Re: Is this unpythonic? Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2015-05-08 20:08 +1000
    Re: Is this unpythonic? "Frank Millman" <frank@chagford.com> - 2015-05-08 12:53 +0200
      Re: Is this unpythonic? Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2015-05-09 01:07 +1000
        Re: Is this unpythonic? "Frank Millman" <frank@chagford.com> - 2015-05-09 07:56 +0200
        Re: Is this unpythonic? "Frank Millman" <frank@chagford.com> - 2015-05-09 08:51 +0200
          Re: Is this unpythonic? Gregory Ewing <greg.ewing@canterbury.ac.nz> - 2015-05-09 19:47 +1200
            Re: Is this unpythonic? "Frank Millman" <frank@chagford.com> - 2015-05-09 11:10 +0200
    Re: Is this unpythonic? Dave Angel <davea@davea.name> - 2015-05-08 08:04 -0400
      Re: Is this unpythonic? Johannes Bauer <dfnsonfsduifb@gmx.de> - 2015-05-10 10:04 +0200
        Re: Is this unpythonic? "Frank Millman" <frank@chagford.com> - 2015-05-10 10:58 +0200
          Re: Is this unpythonic? Johannes Bauer <dfnsonfsduifb@gmx.de> - 2015-05-10 11:54 +0200
            Re: Is this unpythonic? "Frank Millman" <frank@chagford.com> - 2015-05-10 12:40 +0200
    Re: Is this unpythonic? "Frank Millman" <frank@chagford.com> - 2015-05-08 15:12 +0200

csiph-web