Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.python > #16185

Re: suitability of python

Path csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!gegeweb.org!de-l.enfer-du-nord.net!feeder2.enfer-du-nord.net!tudelft.nl!txtfeed1.tudelft.nl!multikabel.net!newsfeed20.multikabel.net!news2.euro.net!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail
Return-Path <python-python-list@m.gmane.org>
X-Original-To python-list@python.org
Delivered-To python-list@mail.python.org
X-Spam-Status OK 0.000
X-Spam-Evidence '*H*': 1.00; '*S*': 0.00; 'python,': 0.01; 'newbie': 0.03; 'python.': 0.04; 'instance,': 0.05; 'numerical': 0.05; 'scipy': 0.05; 'received:verizon.net': 0.07; 'terry': 0.07; 'python': 0.08; '(written': 0.09; 'manipulation': 0.09; 'received:80.91': 0.09; 'received:80.91.229': 0.09; 'received:80.91.229.12': 0.09; 'received:gmane.org': 0.09; 'received:list': 0.09; 'received:lo.gmane.org': 0.09; 'subject:python': 0.10; 'am,': 0.12; 'packages.': 0.13; 'details).': 0.16; 'numpy,': 0.16; 'reedy': 0.16; 'scipy,': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; 'jan': 0.19; 'programming': 0.21; 'later': 0.21; '(but': 0.21; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.22; 'runs': 0.23; 'code': 0.25; 'module': 0.26; 'enabled': 0.30; 'app': 0.31; 'quite': 0.32; 'wondering': 0.32; 'scientific': 0.32; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.33; 'header:X-Complaints-To:1': 0.33; 'weeks': 0.33; 'on,': 0.34; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.34; 'list.': 0.35; 'running': 0.35; 'answers': 0.38; 'received:org': 0.38; 'help': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.40; 'might': 0.40; 'within': 0.60; 'type': 0.61; 'dear': 0.64; 'believe': 0.65; 'heavy': 0.71
X-Injected-Via-Gmane http://gmane.org/
To python-list@python.org
From Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu>
Subject Re: suitability of python
Date Thu, 24 Nov 2011 19:51:10 -0500
References <1322137895.4211.3.camel@roddur>
Mime-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding 7bit
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host pool-74-109-121-73.phlapa.fios.verizon.net
User-Agent Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:8.0) Gecko/20111105 Thunderbird/8.0
In-Reply-To <1322137895.4211.3.camel@roddur>
X-BeenThere python-list@python.org
X-Mailman-Version 2.1.12
Precedence list
List-Id General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org>
List-Unsubscribe <http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list>
List-Post <mailto:python-list@python.org>
List-Help <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe <http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe>
Newsgroups comp.lang.python
Message-ID <mailman.3017.1322182301.27778.python-list@python.org> (permalink)
Lines 23
NNTP-Posting-Host 2001:888:2000:d::a6
X-Trace 1322182301 news.xs4all.nl 6886 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:41587
X-Complaints-To abuse@xs4all.nl
Xref x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.python:16185

Show key headers only | View raw

On 11/24/2011 7:31 AM, Rudra Banerjee wrote:
> Dear friends,
> I am a newbie in python and basically i use python for postprocessing
> like plotting, data manipulation etc.
> Based on ease of programming on python I am wondering if I can consider
> it for the main development as well. My jobs (written on fortran) runs
> for weeks and quite CPU intensive. How python works on these type of
> heavy computation?

The first killer app for Python was running Fortran code from within 
Python. People use Python for both pre- and post-processing. For small 
jobs, this enabled running Fortran interactively.

This lead to Numerical Python, now Numpy, SciPy, and later Sage and 
other scientific and Python packages. I believe SciPy has an f2py 
(fortran to py) module to help with running Fortran under Python (but it 
has been years since I read the details).

Detailed questions might get better answers on, for instance, a scipy list.

-- 
Terry Jan Reedy

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

suitability of python Rudra Banerjee <bnrj.rudra@gmail.com> - 2011-11-24 18:01 +0530
  Re: suitability of python Laurent Claessens <moky.math@gmail.com> - 2011-11-24 13:46 +0100
  Re: suitability of python Dave Angel <d@davea.name> - 2011-11-24 08:08 -0500
  Re: suitability of python Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2011-11-24 19:51 -0500
    Re: suitability of python 88888 Dihedral <dihedral88888@googlemail.com> - 2011-11-24 19:27 -0800
    Re: suitability of python 88888 Dihedral <dihedral88888@googlemail.com> - 2011-11-24 19:27 -0800
    Re: suitability of python alex23 <wuwei23@gmail.com> - 2011-11-24 19:37 -0800
  Re: suitability of python Alan Meyer <ameyer2@yahoo.com> - 2011-11-24 23:06 -0500
  Re: suitability of python Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2011-11-27 17:19 +0000
  Re: suitability of python Stefan Behnel <stefan_ml@behnel.de> - 2011-11-27 17:54 +0000

csiph-web