Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.python > #16189

Re: suitability of python

From 88888 Dihedral <dihedral88888@googlemail.com>
Newsgroups comp.lang.python
Subject Re: suitability of python
Date 2011-11-24 19:27 -0800
Organization http://groups.google.com
Message-ID <1342091.65.1322191632498.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@prmu26> (permalink)
References <1322137895.4211.3.camel@roddur> <mailman.3017.1322182301.27778.python-list@python.org>

Show all headers | View raw


On Friday, November 25, 2011 8:51:10 AM UTC+8, Terry Reedy wrote:
> On 11/24/2011 7:31 AM, Rudra Banerjee wrote:
> > Dear friends,
> > I am a newbie in python and basically i use python for postprocessing
> > like plotting, data manipulation etc.
> > Based on ease of programming on python I am wondering if I can consider
> > it for the main development as well. My jobs (written on fortran) runs
> > for weeks and quite CPU intensive. How python works on these type of
> > heavy computation?
> 
> The first killer app for Python was running Fortran code from within 
> Python. People use Python for both pre- and post-processing. For small 
> jobs, this enabled running Fortran interactively.
> 
> This lead to Numerical Python, now Numpy, SciPy, and later Sage and 
> other scientific and Python packages. I believe SciPy has an f2py 
> (fortran to py) module to help with running Fortran under Python (but it 
> has been years since I read the details).
> 
> Detailed questions might get better answers on, for instance, a scipy list.
> 
> -- 
> Terry Jan Reedy

If pyhthon just handles the user interface and glue logics of well written python modules that are most written c, the speed of running python pyc  is OK. 
  
Of course the object reference updating required  in OOP is completely supported by python. 


Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

suitability of python Rudra Banerjee <bnrj.rudra@gmail.com> - 2011-11-24 18:01 +0530
  Re: suitability of python Laurent Claessens <moky.math@gmail.com> - 2011-11-24 13:46 +0100
  Re: suitability of python Dave Angel <d@davea.name> - 2011-11-24 08:08 -0500
  Re: suitability of python Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2011-11-24 19:51 -0500
    Re: suitability of python 88888 Dihedral <dihedral88888@googlemail.com> - 2011-11-24 19:27 -0800
    Re: suitability of python 88888 Dihedral <dihedral88888@googlemail.com> - 2011-11-24 19:27 -0800
    Re: suitability of python alex23 <wuwei23@gmail.com> - 2011-11-24 19:37 -0800
  Re: suitability of python Alan Meyer <ameyer2@yahoo.com> - 2011-11-24 23:06 -0500
  Re: suitability of python Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2011-11-27 17:19 +0000
  Re: suitability of python Stefan Behnel <stefan_ml@behnel.de> - 2011-11-27 17:54 +0000

csiph-web