Path: csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!gegeweb.org!de-l.enfer-du-nord.net!feeder2.enfer-du-nord.net!tudelft.nl!txtfeed1.tudelft.nl!multikabel.net!newsfeed20.multikabel.net!news2.euro.net!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.000 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 1.00; '*S*': 0.00; 'python,': 0.01; 'newbie': 0.03; 'python.': 0.04; 'instance,': 0.05; 'numerical': 0.05; 'scipy': 0.05; 'received:verizon.net': 0.07; 'terry': 0.07; 'python': 0.08; '(written': 0.09; 'manipulation': 0.09; 'received:80.91': 0.09; 'received:80.91.229': 0.09; 'received:80.91.229.12': 0.09; 'received:gmane.org': 0.09; 'received:list': 0.09; 'received:lo.gmane.org': 0.09; 'subject:python': 0.10; 'am,': 0.12; 'packages.': 0.13; 'details).': 0.16; 'numpy,': 0.16; 'reedy': 0.16; 'scipy,': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; 'jan': 0.19; 'programming': 0.21; 'later': 0.21; '(but': 0.21; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.22; 'runs': 0.23; 'code': 0.25; 'module': 0.26; 'enabled': 0.30; 'app': 0.31; 'quite': 0.32; 'wondering': 0.32; 'scientific': 0.32; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.33; 'header:X-Complaints-To:1': 0.33; 'weeks': 0.33; 'on,': 0.34; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.34; 'list.': 0.35; 'running': 0.35; 'answers': 0.38; 'received:org': 0.38; 'help': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.40; 'might': 0.40; 'within': 0.60; 'type': 0.61; 'dear': 0.64; 'believe': 0.65; 'heavy': 0.71 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: python-list@python.org From: Terry Reedy Subject: Re: suitability of python Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2011 19:51:10 -0500 References: <1322137895.4211.3.camel@roddur> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: pool-74-109-121-73.phlapa.fios.verizon.net User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:8.0) Gecko/20111105 Thunderbird/8.0 In-Reply-To: <1322137895.4211.3.camel@roddur> X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 23 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1322182301 news.xs4all.nl 6886 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:41587 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.python:16185 On 11/24/2011 7:31 AM, Rudra Banerjee wrote: > Dear friends, > I am a newbie in python and basically i use python for postprocessing > like plotting, data manipulation etc. > Based on ease of programming on python I am wondering if I can consider > it for the main development as well. My jobs (written on fortran) runs > for weeks and quite CPU intensive. How python works on these type of > heavy computation? The first killer app for Python was running Fortran code from within Python. People use Python for both pre- and post-processing. For small jobs, this enabled running Fortran interactively. This lead to Numerical Python, now Numpy, SciPy, and later Sage and other scientific and Python packages. I believe SciPy has an f2py (fortran to py) module to help with running Fortran under Python (but it has been years since I read the details). Detailed questions might get better answers on, for instance, a scipy list. -- Terry Jan Reedy