Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.python > #60177

Re: Traceback when using multiprocessing, less than helpful?

Path csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!aioe.org!news.stack.nl!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed2.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail
Return-Path <ethan@stoneleaf.us>
X-Original-To python-list@python.org
Delivered-To python-list@mail.python.org
X-Spam-Status OK 0.011
X-Spam-Evidence '*H*': 0.98; '*S*': 0.00; 'that?': 0.05; 'from:addr:ethan': 0.09; 'from:addr:stoneleaf.us': 0.09; 'from:name:ethan furman': 0.09; 'message-id:@stoneleaf.us': 0.09; 'subject:using': 0.09; '~ethan~': 0.09; 'subject:skip:m 10': 0.16; 'subject:when': 0.16; 'exception': 0.16; 'so.': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; 'not,': 0.20; 'issue.': 0.22; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.23; 'certainly': 0.24; 'this:': 0.26; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.27; 'bug?': 0.31; 'anyone': 0.31; 'skip:m 30': 0.32; 'doing': 0.36; 'charset:us-ascii': 0.36; 'subject:?': 0.36; 'should': 0.36; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.38; 'pm,': 0.38; 'anything': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'how': 0.40; 'new': 0.61; 'john': 0.61; 'received:173': 0.61; 'received:64.5': 0.84; 'ultimate': 0.93; 'obtained': 0.96
Date Thu, 21 Nov 2013 14:32:08 -0800
From Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us>
User-Agent Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121010 Thunderbird/16.0.1
MIME-Version 1.0
To python-list@python.org
Subject Re: Traceback when using multiprocessing, less than helpful?
References <e92311cb-6cc5-415a-bbf8-544c0c9c6a54@googlegroups.com> <mailman.3013.1385054683.18130.python-list@python.org> <9eb71131-7ca0-4a21-a8f3-98371ee8787e@googlegroups.com> <mailman.3014.1385067196.18130.python-list@python.org> <46e03756-a242-4cdd-a5c0-30fcff34c98c@googlegroups.com> <e90dbd18-97ae-4e92-b521-5818d015244a@googlegroups.com>
In-Reply-To <e90dbd18-97ae-4e92-b521-5818d015244a@googlegroups.com>
Content-Type text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding 7bit
X-AntiAbuse This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse Primary Hostname - gator3304.hostgator.com
X-AntiAbuse Original Domain - python.org
X-AntiAbuse Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse Sender Address Domain - stoneleaf.us
X-BWhitelist no
X-Source-IP 173.12.184.233
X-Source
X-Source-Args
X-Source-Dir
X-Source-Sender ([173.12.184.233]) [173.12.184.233]:39253
X-Source-Auth ethan+stoneleaf.us
X-Email-Count 1
X-Source-Cap dG9idWs7dG9idWs7Z2F0b3IzMzA0Lmhvc3RnYXRvci5jb20=
X-BeenThere python-list@python.org
X-Mailman-Version 2.1.15
Precedence list
List-Id General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org>
List-Unsubscribe <https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/>
List-Post <mailto:python-list@python.org>
List-Help <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe <https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe>
Newsgroups comp.lang.python
Message-ID <mailman.3016.1385073129.18130.python-list@python.org> (permalink)
Lines 19
NNTP-Posting-Host 2001:888:2000:d::a6
X-Trace 1385073129 news.xs4all.nl 15882 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:35042
X-Complaints-To abuse@xs4all.nl
Xref csiph.com comp.lang.python:60177

Show key headers only | View raw

On 11/21/2013 01:49 PM, John Ladasky wrote:
>
> So now, for anyone who is still reading this: is it your
> opinion that the traceback that I obtained through
>  multiprocessing.pool._map_async().get() SHOULD have allowed
>  me to see what the ultimate cause of the exception was?

It would certainly be nice.

> I think so.  Is it a bug?  Should I request a bugfix?  How
> do I go about doing that?

Check out bugs.python.org.  Search for multiprocessing and tracebacks to see if anything is already there; if not, 
create a new issue.

--
~Ethan~

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Traceback when using multiprocessing, less than helpful? John Ladasky <john_ladasky@sbcglobal.net> - 2013-11-21 09:01 -0800
  Re: Traceback when using multiprocessing, less than helpful? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-11-22 04:24 +1100
    Re: Traceback when using multiprocessing, less than helpful? John Ladasky <john_ladasky@sbcglobal.net> - 2013-11-21 10:25 -0800
      Re: Traceback when using multiprocessing, less than helpful? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-11-22 07:53 +1100
        Re: Traceback when using multiprocessing, less than helpful? John Ladasky <john_ladasky@sbcglobal.net> - 2013-11-21 13:19 -0800
          Re: Traceback when using multiprocessing, less than helpful? John Ladasky <john_ladasky@sbcglobal.net> - 2013-11-21 13:49 -0800
            Re: Traceback when using multiprocessing, less than helpful? Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> - 2013-11-21 14:32 -0800
  Re: Traceback when using multiprocessing, less than helpful? Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2013-11-21 17:37 -0500
  Re: Traceback when using multiprocessing, less than helpful? John Ladasky <john_ladasky@sbcglobal.net> - 2013-11-21 19:57 -0800
    Re: Traceback when using multiprocessing, less than helpful? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-11-22 15:24 +1100
      Why pickling (was: Traceback when using multiprocessing) John Ladasky <john_ladasky@sbcglobal.net> - 2013-11-22 08:38 -0800
        Re: Why pickling (was: Traceback when using multiprocessing) Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-11-23 10:50 +1100
    Re: Traceback when using multiprocessing, less than helpful? Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2013-11-22 09:09 +0000

csiph-web