Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #26630
| Path | csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!dedibox.gegeweb.org!gegeweb.eu!nntpfeed.proxad.net!proxad.net!feeder1-1.proxad.net!217.73.144.45.MISMATCH!feeder2.ecngs.de!ecngs!feeder.ecngs.de!xlned.com!feeder1.xlned.com!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed5.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| Return-Path | <ethan@stoneleaf.us> |
| X-Original-To | python-list@python.org |
| Delivered-To | python-list@mail.python.org |
| X-Spam-Status | OK 0.000 |
| X-Spam-Evidence | '*H*': 1.00; '*S*': 0.00; 'algorithm': 0.03; 'nested': 0.07; 'suppose': 0.07; 'tom': 0.07; 'from:addr:ethan': 0.09; 'from:addr:stoneleaf.us': 0.09; 'from:name:ethan furman': 0.09; 'iterate': 0.09; 'message-id:@stoneleaf.us': 0.09; 'received:184.172': 0.09; 'received:gator410.hostgator.com': 0.09; '~ethan~': 0.09; 'received:69.93': 0.16; 'received:72.11': 0.16; 'received:72.11.125': 0.16; 'received:72.11.125.166': 0.16; 'received:gateway13.websitewelcome.com': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.17; 'variable': 0.20; 'subject:problem': 0.22; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.25; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.26; 'values': 0.26; 'wondering': 0.26; 'realize': 0.27; 'this?': 0.28; 'initial': 0.28; "i'm": 0.29; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.33; 'sequence': 0.35; 'something': 0.35; 'there': 0.35; 'but': 0.36; 'subject:: ': 0.38; 'some': 0.38; 'things': 0.38; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'header:Received:5': 0.40; '10,000': 0.65; 'subject:looking': 0.91 |
| Date | Mon, 06 Aug 2012 09:15:58 -0700 |
| From | Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> |
| User-Agent | Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (Windows/20070221) |
| MIME-Version | 1.0 |
| To | python-list@python.org |
| Subject | Re: looking for a neat solution to a nested loop problem |
| References | <a8a7hvF8crU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In-Reply-To | <a8a7hvF8crU1@mid.individual.net> |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 7bit |
| X-AntiAbuse | This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report |
| X-AntiAbuse | Primary Hostname - gator410.hostgator.com |
| X-AntiAbuse | Original Domain - python.org |
| X-AntiAbuse | Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] |
| X-AntiAbuse | Sender Address Domain - stoneleaf.us |
| X-BWhitelist | no |
| X-Source | |
| X-Source-Args | |
| X-Source-Dir | |
| X-Source-Sender | ([192.168.10.136]) [72.11.125.166]:4014 |
| X-Source-Auth | ethan+stoneleaf.us |
| X-Email-Count | 1 |
| X-Source-Cap | dG9idWs7dG9idWs7Z2F0b3I0MTAuaG9zdGdhdG9yLmNvbQ== |
| X-BeenThere | python-list@python.org |
| X-Mailman-Version | 2.1.12 |
| Precedence | list |
| List-Id | General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org> |
| List-Unsubscribe | <http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe> |
| List-Archive | <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list> |
| List-Post | <mailto:python-list@python.org> |
| List-Help | <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help> |
| List-Subscribe | <http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.3015.1344269486.4697.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
| Lines | 20 |
| NNTP-Posting-Host | 2001:888:2000:d::a6 |
| X-Trace | 1344269486 news.xs4all.nl 6925 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:44499 |
| X-Complaints-To | abuse@xs4all.nl |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.lang.python:26630 |
Show key headers only | View raw
Tom P wrote:
> consider a nested loop algorithm -
>
> for i in range(100):
> for j in range(100):
> do_something(i,j)
>
> Now, suppose I don't want to use i = 0 and j = 0 as initial values, but
> some other values i = N and j = M, and I want to iterate through all
> 10,000 values in sequence - is there a neat python-like way to this? I
> realize I can do things like use a variable for k in range(10000): and
> then derive values for i and j from k, but I'm wondering if there's
> something less clunky.
for i in range(N, N+100):
for j in range(M, M+100):
do_something(i, j)
~Ethan~
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
looking for a neat solution to a nested loop problem Tom P <werotizy@freent.dd> - 2012-08-06 17:52 +0200
Re: looking for a neat solution to a nested loop problem John Gordon <gordon@panix.com> - 2012-08-06 16:03 +0000
Re: looking for a neat solution to a nested loop problem Tom P <werotizy@freent.dd> - 2012-08-06 19:16 +0200
Re: looking for a neat solution to a nested loop problem Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2012-08-07 01:27 +0000
Re: looking for a neat solution to a nested loop problem Ian Foote <ian@feete.org> - 2012-08-06 17:07 +0100
Re: looking for a neat solution to a nested loop problem Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> - 2012-08-06 09:15 -0700
Re: looking for a neat solution to a nested loop problem Nobody <nobody@nowhere.com> - 2012-08-06 17:18 +0100
Re: looking for a neat solution to a nested loop problem Tom P <werotizy@freent.dd> - 2012-08-06 19:14 +0200
Re: looking for a neat solution to a nested loop problem Emile van Sebille <emile@fenx.com> - 2012-08-06 11:11 -0700
Re: looking for a neat solution to a nested loop problem Larry Hudson <orgnut@yahoo.com> - 2012-08-06 21:02 -0700
Re: looking for a neat solution to a nested loop problem Nobody <nobody@nowhere.com> - 2012-08-07 16:32 +0100
Re: looking for a neat solution to a nested loop problem 88888 Dihedral <dihedral88888@googlemail.com> - 2012-08-07 18:42 -0700
Re: looking for a neat solution to a nested loop problem 88888 Dihedral <dihedral88888@googlemail.com> - 2012-08-09 11:46 -0700
Re: looking for a neat solution to a nested loop problem 88888 Dihedral <dihedral88888@googlemail.com> - 2012-08-09 11:39 -0700
Re: looking for a neat solution to a nested loop problem 88888 Dihedral <dihedral88888@googlemail.com> - 2012-08-14 14:08 -0700
Re: looking for a neat solution to a nested loop problem Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2012-08-06 18:25 +0000
Re: looking for a neat solution to a nested loop problem Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2012-08-06 18:29 +0000
Re: looking for a neat solution to a nested loop problem Tom P <werotizy@freent.dd> - 2012-08-06 21:03 +0200
Re: looking for a neat solution to a nested loop problem Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2012-08-06 19:22 +0000
Re: looking for a neat solution to a nested loop problem Emile van Sebille <emile@fenx.com> - 2012-08-06 12:52 -0700
Re: looking for a neat solution to a nested loop problem André Malo <ndparker@gmail.com> - 2012-08-06 20:19 +0200
Re: looking for a neat solution to a nested loop problem Dennis Lee Bieber <wlfraed@ix.netcom.com> - 2012-08-06 15:31 -0400
Re: looking for a neat solution to a nested loop problem Arnaud Delobelle <arnodel@gmail.com> - 2012-08-06 21:14 +0100
csiph-web