Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #26342
| Date | 2012-08-01 12:16 +0200 |
|---|---|
| From | Laszlo Nagy <gandalf@shopzeus.com> |
| Subject | Re: Pass data to a subprocess |
| References | (1 earlier) <CAF_E5JY2sEsauXM-teW4hTHePqFCYK6z+9oLMZcjVWFyYs+gKg@mail.gmail.com> <5017EFB0.6080608@shopzeus.com> <CAF_E5JaEHxsjKoHRhZLzh+YdPU8UqKHae9efCsP7zEvm_37+2w@mail.gmail.com> <5018E687.9000105@shopzeus.com> <CAF_E5Jb83D6Uk-HG0sq5urTfxh6z9_fw+RR2ZEmesWTjEFR4-A@mail.gmail.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.2813.1343816220.4697.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
> > Thanks, there is another thing which is able to interact with running > processes in theory: > https://github.com/lmacken/pyrasite > > I don't know though if it's a good idea to use a similar approach for > production code, as far as I understood it uses gdb.. In theory > though I could be able to set up every subprocess with all the data > they need, so I might not even need to share data between them. > > Anyway now I had another idea to avoid to be able to stop the main > process without killing the subprocesses, using multiple forks. Does > the following makes sense? I don't really need these subprocesses to > be daemons since they should quit when done, but is there anything > that can go wrong with this approach? On thing is sure: os.fork() doesn't work under Microsoft Windows. Under Unix, I'm not sure if os.fork() can be mixed with multiprocessing.Process.start(). I could not find official documentation on that. This must be tested on your actual platform. And don't forget to use Queue.get() in your test. :-)
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Pass data to a subprocess Laszlo Nagy <gandalf@shopzeus.com> - 2012-08-01 12:16 +0200
csiph-web