Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #26342 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Laszlo Nagy <gandalf@shopzeus.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2012-08-01 12:16 +0200 |
| Last post | 2012-08-01 12:16 +0200 |
| Articles | 1 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.python
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: Pass data to a subprocess Laszlo Nagy <gandalf@shopzeus.com> - 2012-08-01 12:16 +0200
| From | Laszlo Nagy <gandalf@shopzeus.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-08-01 12:16 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: Pass data to a subprocess |
| Message-ID | <mailman.2813.1343816220.4697.python-list@python.org> |
> > Thanks, there is another thing which is able to interact with running > processes in theory: > https://github.com/lmacken/pyrasite > > I don't know though if it's a good idea to use a similar approach for > production code, as far as I understood it uses gdb.. In theory > though I could be able to set up every subprocess with all the data > they need, so I might not even need to share data between them. > > Anyway now I had another idea to avoid to be able to stop the main > process without killing the subprocesses, using multiple forks. Does > the following makes sense? I don't really need these subprocesses to > be daemons since they should quit when done, but is there anything > that can go wrong with this approach? On thing is sure: os.fork() doesn't work under Microsoft Windows. Under Unix, I'm not sure if os.fork() can be mixed with multiprocessing.Process.start(). I could not find official documentation on that. This must be tested on your actual platform. And don't forget to use Queue.get() in your test. :-)
Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.python
csiph-web