Path: csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!weretis.net!feeder4.news.weretis.net!feeder2.ecngs.de!ecngs!feeder.ecngs.de!xlned.com!feeder1.xlned.com!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed5.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.025 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.95; '*S*': 0.00; 'unix,': 0.09; 'url:github': 0.09; 'cc:addr:python-list': 0.10; 'anyway': 0.11; ':-)': 0.13; 'daemons': 0.16; 'forks.': 0.16; 'subprocess': 0.16; 'test.': 0.17; 'thanks,': 0.18; 'code,': 0.18; 'cc:2**0': 0.23; 'cc:no real name:2**0': 0.24; 'idea': 0.24; 'cc:addr:python.org': 0.25; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.25; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.26; 'skip:m 30': 0.26; "doesn't": 0.28; 'actual': 0.28; "i'm": 0.29; 'that.': 0.30; 'running': 0.32; 'could': 0.32; 'done,': 0.33; 'mixed': 0.33; 'subject:data': 0.33; 'another': 0.33; 'wrong': 0.34; 'similar': 0.35; 'there': 0.35; 'really': 0.36; 'but': 0.36; 'anything': 0.36; 'should': 0.36; 'does': 0.37; 'uses': 0.37; 'far': 0.37; 'data': 0.37; 'subject:: ': 0.38; 'sure': 0.38; 'received:192': 0.39; 'received:192.168': 0.40; 'your': 0.60; 'share': 0.61; 'between': 0.63; 'production': 0.63; 'received:204': 0.72; 'killing': 0.84 Date: Wed, 01 Aug 2012 12:16:53 +0200 From: Laszlo Nagy User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120714 Thunderbird/14.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: andrea crotti Subject: Re: Pass data to a subprocess References: <5017EFB0.6080608@shopzeus.com> <5018E687.9000105@shopzeus.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: python-list@python.org X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 22 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1343816220 news.xs4all.nl 6949 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:57451 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:26342 > > Thanks, there is another thing which is able to interact with running > processes in theory: > https://github.com/lmacken/pyrasite > > I don't know though if it's a good idea to use a similar approach for > production code, as far as I understood it uses gdb.. In theory > though I could be able to set up every subprocess with all the data > they need, so I might not even need to share data between them. > > Anyway now I had another idea to avoid to be able to stop the main > process without killing the subprocesses, using multiple forks. Does > the following makes sense? I don't really need these subprocesses to > be daemons since they should quit when done, but is there anything > that can go wrong with this approach? On thing is sure: os.fork() doesn't work under Microsoft Windows. Under Unix, I'm not sure if os.fork() can be mixed with multiprocessing.Process.start(). I could not find official documentation on that. This must be tested on your actual platform. And don't forget to use Queue.get() in your test. :-)