Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.python > #90214

Re: Is this unpythonic?

Path csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!news.redatomik.org!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed1.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail
Return-Path <python-python-list@m.gmane.org>
X-Original-To python-list@python.org
Delivered-To python-list@mail.python.org
X-Spam-Status OK 0.003
X-Spam-Evidence '*H*': 0.99; '*S*': 0.00; 'list?': 0.07; 'result,': 0.07; 'string': 0.09; 'iterate': 0.09; 'posting.': 0.09; 'received:80.91': 0.09; 'received:80.91.229': 0.09; 'received:gmane.org': 0.09; 'received:list': 0.09; 'def': 0.12; 'assume': 0.14; 'wrote': 0.14; "wouldn't": 0.14; "chris'": 0.16; 'dictionaries': 0.16; 'dictionary,': 0.16; 'received:80.91.229.3': 0.16; 'received:plane.gmane.org': 0.16; 'skip:n 50': 0.16; 'tuple': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; 'unlike': 0.19; '>>>': 0.22; 'exists': 0.24; 'instead.': 0.24; 'sorry,': 0.24; 'pass': 0.26; 'values': 0.27; 'header:X-Complaints-To:1': 0.27; 'idea': 0.28; 'testing': 0.29; 'work.': 0.31; '>>>>': 0.31; 'keys': 0.31; 'probably': 0.32; 'worked': 0.33; 'fri,': 0.33; 'could': 0.34; 'operations': 0.35; 'test': 0.35; 'but': 0.35; 'there': 0.35; 'really': 0.36; 'subject:?': 0.36; 'should': 0.36; 'changing': 0.37; 'two': 0.37; 'list.': 0.37; 'work?': 0.38; 'needed': 0.38; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.38; 'list,': 0.38; 'pm,': 0.38; 'does': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'received:org': 0.40; 'decided': 0.64; 'more': 0.64; 'situation': 0.65; 'here': 0.66; 'frank': 0.68; 'default': 0.69; 'subject:this': 0.83; '2015': 0.84; 'cough,': 0.84; 'trick,': 0.84
X-Injected-Via-Gmane http://gmane.org/
To python-list@python.org
From "Frank Millman" <frank@chagford.com>
Subject Re: Is this unpythonic?
Date Sat, 9 May 2015 08:51:40 +0200
References <mailman.224.1431072121.12865.python-list@python.org> <554c8b0a$0$12992$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <mailman.231.1431082398.12865.python-list@python.org> <554cd119$0$12977$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <mik7j6$59n$1@ger.gmane.org>
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host 197.89.68.193
X-MSMail-Priority Normal
X-Newsreader Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.3790.4657
X-MimeOLE Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.3790.4913
X-RFC2646 Format=Flowed; Response
X-BeenThere python-list@python.org
X-Mailman-Version 2.1.20+
Precedence list
List-Id General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org>
List-Unsubscribe <https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/>
List-Post <mailto:python-list@python.org>
List-Help <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe <https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe>
Newsgroups comp.lang.python
Message-ID <mailman.273.1431154310.12865.python-list@python.org> (permalink)
Lines 63
NNTP-Posting-Host 2001:888:2000:d::a6
X-Trace 1431154310 news.xs4all.nl 2868 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:40205
X-Complaints-To abuse@xs4all.nl
Xref csiph.com comp.lang.python:90214

Show key headers only | View raw


"Frank Millman" <frank@chagford.com> wrote in message 
news:mik7j6$59n$1@ger.gmane.org...
>
> "Steven D'Aprano" <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> wrote in message 
> news:554cd119$0$12977$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com...
>> On Fri, 8 May 2015 08:53 pm, Frank Millman wrote:
>>
>>>> Does z have to be a list? Could you use an empty tuple instead?
>>>>
>>>> def x(y, z=()): ...
>>>>
>>>
>>> That was Chris' suggestion as well (thanks Chris).
>>>
>>> The idea appealed to me, but then I found a situation where I pass in a
>>> dictionary instead of a list, so that would not work.
>>
>>
>> Why wouldn't it work? If it worked with an empty list, it will probably 
>> work
>> with an empty tuple instead.
>>
>
> Sorry, I should have been more explicit. In the case of a dictionary, I 
> used 'def x(y, z={}'
>
> I have not checked, but I assume that as dictionaries are mutable, this 
> suffers from the same drawback as a default list.
>
> Unlike a list, it cannot be replaced by an empty tuple without changing 
> the body of the function.
>
> Dave's suggestion would have worked here -
>
>    EMPTY_LIST = []
>    EMPTY_DICT = {}
>
> But as I have decided to use the None trick, I use it for a default 
> dictionary as well.
>

Cough, cough, I really should have given that a moment's thought before 
posting.

It just dawned on me that a dictionary *can* be replaced by an empty tuple 
without changing the body of the function.

There are two operations I might perform on the dictionary -

1. iterate over the keys and retrieve the values

2: use 'in' to test if a given string exists as a key

Both of these operations will work on a tuple and give the desired result, 
so it is a very valid workaround.

More testing needed ...

Frank


Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Is this unpythonic? "Frank Millman" <frank@chagford.com> - 2015-05-08 10:01 +0200
  Re: Is this unpythonic? Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2015-05-08 20:08 +1000
    Re: Is this unpythonic? "Frank Millman" <frank@chagford.com> - 2015-05-08 12:53 +0200
      Re: Is this unpythonic? Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2015-05-09 01:07 +1000
        Re: Is this unpythonic? "Frank Millman" <frank@chagford.com> - 2015-05-09 07:56 +0200
        Re: Is this unpythonic? "Frank Millman" <frank@chagford.com> - 2015-05-09 08:51 +0200
          Re: Is this unpythonic? Gregory Ewing <greg.ewing@canterbury.ac.nz> - 2015-05-09 19:47 +1200
            Re: Is this unpythonic? "Frank Millman" <frank@chagford.com> - 2015-05-09 11:10 +0200
    Re: Is this unpythonic? Dave Angel <davea@davea.name> - 2015-05-08 08:04 -0400
      Re: Is this unpythonic? Johannes Bauer <dfnsonfsduifb@gmx.de> - 2015-05-10 10:04 +0200
        Re: Is this unpythonic? "Frank Millman" <frank@chagford.com> - 2015-05-10 10:58 +0200
          Re: Is this unpythonic? Johannes Bauer <dfnsonfsduifb@gmx.de> - 2015-05-10 11:54 +0200
            Re: Is this unpythonic? "Frank Millman" <frank@chagford.com> - 2015-05-10 12:40 +0200
    Re: Is this unpythonic? "Frank Millman" <frank@chagford.com> - 2015-05-08 15:12 +0200

csiph-web