Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #25731
| References | <500A5B47.1060805@freenet.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-07-21 19:04 +1000 |
| Subject | Re: Basic question about speed/coding style/memory |
| From | Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.2370.1342861455.4697.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
On Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 5:33 PM, Jan Riechers <janpeterr@freenet.de> wrote:
> Block
> #----------------------------------
> if statemente_true:
> doSomething()
> else:
> doSomethingElseInstead()
>
> #----------------------------------
This means, to me, that the two options are peers - you do this or you do that.
> versus this block:
> #----------------------------------
> if statement_true:
> doSomething()
> return
>
> doSomethingElseInstead()
>
> #----------------------------------
This would be for an early abort. Don't bother doing most of this
function's work, just doSomething. Might be an error condition, or
perhaps an optimized path.
Definitely for error conditions, I would use the second option. The
"fail and bail" notation keeps the entire error handling in one place:
def func(x,y,z):
if x<0:
y+=5
return
if y<0:
raise PEBKAC("There's an idiot here somewhere")
# ... do the rest of the work
Note the similarity between the control structures. Raising an
exception immediately terminates processing, without polluting the
rest of the function with an unnecessary indentation level. Early
aborting through normal function return can do the same thing.
But this is purely a matter of style. I don't think there's any
significance in terms of processing time or memory usage, and even if
there is, it would be dwarfed by considerations of readability. Make
your code look like what it's doing, and let the execution take care
of itself.
ChrisA
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Basic question about speed/coding style/memory Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2012-07-21 19:04 +1000 Re: Basic question about speed/coding style/memory 88888 Dihedral <dihedral88888@googlemail.com> - 2012-07-23 14:48 -0700 Re: Basic question about speed/coding style/memory 88888 Dihedral <dihedral88888@googlemail.com> - 2012-07-23 14:48 -0700
csiph-web