Path: csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!gegeweb.org!usenet-fr.net!nerim.net!novso.com!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed5.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.000 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 1.00; '*S*': 0.00; 'else:': 0.03; 'exception': 0.03; '21,': 0.07; 'means,': 0.07; 'subject:question': 0.08; 'notation': 0.09; 'path.': 0.09; 'processing,': 0.09; 'skip:# 30': 0.09; 'terminates': 0.09; 'def': 0.10; 'itself.': 0.11; 'sat,': 0.15; 'block:': 0.16; 'doing,': 0.16; 'dwarfed': 0.16; 'from:addr:rosuav': 0.16; 'from:name:chris angelico': 0.16; "function's": 0.16; 'readability.': 0.16; 'subject:coding': 0.16; 'usage,': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.17; 'jan': 0.18; 'memory': 0.18; 'received:209.85.214.174': 0.21; 'option.': 0.22; 'work,': 0.22; 'raise': 0.24; 'second': 0.24; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.25; 'handling': 0.27; 'execution': 0.27; 'message-id:@mail.gmail.com': 0.27; 'options': 0.27; 'rest': 0.28; 'subject:/': 0.28; 'indentation': 0.29; 'style.': 0.29; 'that.': 0.30; 'function': 0.30; 'error': 0.30; 'code': 0.31; 'raising': 0.33; 'to:addr :python-list': 0.33; 'skip:d 20': 0.34; 'received:google.com': 0.34; 'doing': 0.35; 'pm,': 0.35; 'received:209.85': 0.35; 'there': 0.35; 'but': 0.36; 'level.': 0.36; 'keeps': 0.37; 'two': 0.37; 'received:209': 0.37; 'subject:: ': 0.38; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'received:209.85.214': 0.39; 'header:Received:5': 0.40; 'think': 0.40; 'your': 0.60; 'most': 0.61; 'matter': 0.61; 'between': 0.63; 'here': 0.65; 'jul': 0.65; 'unnecessary': 0.65; 'conditions,': 0.84; 'idiot': 0.84; 'significance': 0.84; 'subject:Basic': 0.84 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=t2M/TNT0Bg2QiJvR43H0/fqiT4xToM6VzqdUPbvBpPg=; b=EhMT5JMo+mC4hGv3LoM6JdamXhqNaj8+YDWdmCRcCBFniP8xbInOf3D97kHVKHyL4F 8c0CTL15RuqWq2JdU+kYrsIlVuilCzJwWTVh7I/AzV/zkOWNH5S8hfVWanpX693IhVua hob8UAtybP2WymoBBx77HVWCziQVoLnSJzlpcbfJlRLxJX5P+ZbSv22uY4sRdovEXuzO DaidsU3Zq05vh8JqaEnHptg4eFhFzmsoPMz5mjLpkwWAmsY9dNQ4VzdlVEH1xey/RE1M cYdV4PlfrCMwotLRPzMTGqpnWv5SoWpphYnvFS7E5X0DQgldKZglxPaLAkaBX5n4XiPj iFSg== MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <500A5B47.1060805@freenet.de> References: <500A5B47.1060805@freenet.de> Date: Sat, 21 Jul 2012 19:04:12 +1000 Subject: Re: Basic question about speed/coding style/memory From: Chris Angelico To: python-list@python.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 49 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1342861455 news.xs4all.nl 6965 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:60779 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:25731 On Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 5:33 PM, Jan Riechers wrote: > Block > #---------------------------------- > if statemente_true: > doSomething() > else: > doSomethingElseInstead() > > #---------------------------------- This means, to me, that the two options are peers - you do this or you do that. > versus this block: > #---------------------------------- > if statement_true: > doSomething() > return > > doSomethingElseInstead() > > #---------------------------------- This would be for an early abort. Don't bother doing most of this function's work, just doSomething. Might be an error condition, or perhaps an optimized path. Definitely for error conditions, I would use the second option. The "fail and bail" notation keeps the entire error handling in one place: def func(x,y,z): if x<0: y+=5 return if y<0: raise PEBKAC("There's an idiot here somewhere") # ... do the rest of the work Note the similarity between the control structures. Raising an exception immediately terminates processing, without polluting the rest of the function with an unnecessary indentation level. Early aborting through normal function return can do the same thing. But this is purely a matter of style. I don't think there's any significance in terms of processing time or memory usage, and even if there is, it would be dwarfed by considerations of readability. Make your code look like what it's doing, and let the execution take care of itself. ChrisA