Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.python > #58978

Re: Languages for different purposes (was Re: New user's initial thoughts / criticisms of Python)

Path csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!weretis.net!feeder1.news.weretis.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!xlned.com!feeder3.xlned.com!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed1.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail
Return-Path <rosuav@gmail.com>
X-Original-To python-list@python.org
Delivered-To python-list@mail.python.org
X-Spam-Status OK 0.017
X-Spam-Evidence '*H*': 0.97; '*S*': 0.00; 'python,': 0.02; 'subject:Python': 0.06; 'javascript,': 0.07; 'in-house': 0.09; 'scripting': 0.09; 'language.': 0.14; 'from:addr:rosuav': 0.16; 'from:name:chris angelico': 0.16; 'roy': 0.16; 'subject: \n ': 0.16; 'subject:Languages': 0.16; 'subject:user': 0.16; 'worst': 0.16; 'language': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; 'app': 0.19; 'trying': 0.19; 'coding': 0.22; 'developing': 0.27; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.27; 'chris': 0.29; 'am,': 0.29; 'experiences': 0.30; 'strongly': 0.30; 'message-id:@mail.gmail.com': 0.30; 'code': 0.31; 'bad.': 0.31; 'languages': 0.32; 'subject: (': 0.35; 'but': 0.35; 'received:google.com': 0.35; 'subject:New': 0.37; 'nov': 0.38; 'whatever': 0.38; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.38; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'called': 0.40; 'subject: / ': 0.60; 'new': 0.61; 'making': 0.63; 'media': 0.66; 'worth': 0.66; 'production': 0.68; 'smith': 0.68; 'evaluate': 0.72; 'player.': 0.84; 'try,': 0.84; 'notion': 0.91; '2013': 0.98
DKIM-Signature v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=POq9RdvbL+XHetW6iBb1vkoD/qrpPbyYAv5agY0U+mU=; b=oqlnDc5fi2LbS9Hbzf/h+NlUCSsccrfX1GVnQFYxXWMym9vrFppkvnd3Ux60tLLQPx YyiVOheUzSuLYt83sIlwdLgGDOaxYGCXGt5KifEb2+iWN/eynVbKBUngoscBkuCayxmw G3tUjyzA/xod5/LpspcIWdsRPRwyFyCtmEtFcomAYjcmaAebzdAYbHsFXN9dgbdHeIFj kv28JS3f7/9FC/fjb6rhUN4p7GAvlwU3uQG2ruLDeysPJ4w4imeCiGVN4246s8VqeYi+ Ty45I9P6XMRZfVDsSndermZuhUv728gtdN6U/ZVNHMiMvemWgb1pfbVMc9dtziT+dMHB acuw==
MIME-Version 1.0
X-Received by 10.68.171.5 with SMTP id aq5mr22714306pbc.21.1384044789656; Sat, 09 Nov 2013 16:53:09 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To <roy-D137D2.19415309112013@news.panix.com>
References <CAPTjJmrdOXr31W+ta=7O1bQE9RKUj_sSeOK4s+hXSjs7357gzg@mail.gmail.com> <mailman.2314.1384039476.18130.python-list@python.org> <roy-D137D2.19415309112013@news.panix.com>
Date Sun, 10 Nov 2013 11:53:09 +1100
Subject Re: Languages for different purposes (was Re: New user's initial thoughts / criticisms of Python)
From Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com>
To python-list@python.org
Content-Type text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-BeenThere python-list@python.org
X-Mailman-Version 2.1.15
Precedence list
List-Id General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org>
List-Unsubscribe <https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/>
List-Post <mailto:python-list@python.org>
List-Help <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe <https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe>
Newsgroups comp.lang.python
Message-ID <mailman.2317.1384044797.18130.python-list@python.org> (permalink)
Lines 17
NNTP-Posting-Host 2001:888:2000:d::a6
X-Trace 1384044797 news.xs4all.nl 15982 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:54704
X-Complaints-To abuse@xs4all.nl
Xref csiph.com comp.lang.python:58978

Show key headers only | View raw

On Sun, Nov 10, 2013 at 11:41 AM, Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> wrote:
> On 09/11/2013 22:58, Chris Angelico wrote:
>> >
>> > * Some languages are just fundamentally bad. I do not recommend ever
>> > writing production code in Whitespace, Ook, or Piet.
>
> One of the worst coding experiences I ever had was trying to build an
> app for a Roku media player.  They have a home-grown language called
> BrightScript.  Barf.

And this is exactly why I was so strongly against the notion of
developing an in-house scripting language. It may be a lot of work to
evaluate Lua, Python, JavaScript, and whatever others we wanted to
try, but it's a *lot* less work than making a new language that
actually is worth using.

ChrisA

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: Languages for different purposes (was Re: New user's initial thoughts / criticisms of Python) Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2013-11-09 23:24 +0000
  Re: Languages for different purposes (was Re: New user's initial thoughts / criticisms of Python) Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2013-11-09 19:41 -0500
    Re: Languages for different purposes (was Re: New user's initial thoughts / criticisms of Python) Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-11-10 11:53 +1100
      Re: Languages for different purposes (was Re: New user's initial thoughts / criticisms of Python) Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2013-11-10 08:56 +0000
        Re: Languages for different purposes (was Re: New user's initial thoughts / criticisms of Python) 88888 Dihedral <dihedral88888@gmail.com> - 2013-11-11 09:51 -0800

csiph-web